Food Safety Bill Passes: E.Coli Tremble

The Senate passed the Food Safety Enhancement Act which gives the Food and Drug Administration dramatically greater power to regulate food production and distribution. Bouyed by the outbreak of salmonella in eggs earlier this year, the Act was supported by both activists and industry as a way to improve food safety, especially to reduce the incidence of foodborne illnesses. Industry? Cynics might suspect that a little bit of socializing of risk might be going on, but what do they know?

As it happens the Centers for Disease Control reports this year that the rates of six different foodborne illnesses have declined when compared with 1996-1998. Admittedly, the decline has apparently stalled in recent years.

I noted in a recent column on the topic that private food companies were already developing testing and certification programs to address their customers' worries about foodborne illness. I further predicted:

We can expect that as the media and consumers focus more attention on food safety, that food producers and processors will respond to market demands with increasing alacrity and effectiveness. The new regulations sought by the FDA will only slow down that process while offering the illusion of increased safety.

Perhaps I am wrong and the new regulations will work exactly as their proponents hope and the trends in foodborne illness will dramatically improve. Just to keep me and the FDA honest I plan revisit these data in future years.

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • Old Mexican||

    . The new regulations sought by the FDA will only slow down that process while offering the illusion of increased safety.


    *** Not much later than the newly-mindet regulations start to be enforced, a bout of E.Coli will prompt Statist fucks to call for even further regulation as the previous regulation was "obviously not enough." ***

    Chance of happenning? 100%

  • Big Food||

    We're already planning it.

  • Old Mexican||

    that's "newly minted"

  • Virginia||

    Will the mob-ruled House include the Tester Amendment? If not, then I've got some sweet predictions about industry consolidation.

  • Wind Rider||

    Never let a manufactured and overblown "crisis" go to waste.

    This shit is enough to make the Amish arm themselves to the teeth. They're gonna need it.

  • Ray Pew||

    Decreases in pathogenic contaminants will occur regardless of regulations, as food testing methodology has become faster, more sensitive and cheaper.

    But fear not...the government will take credit for this.

  • BWM||

    If the bill isn't supporting irradiating food, then they don't care about safety.

  • anarch||

    Outlawing salmonella drives demand up, it goes into black-market, niche-vendors spring forth (wild vs. farm-raised), economy gets a boost, everyone wins.

  • hurly buerhle||

    Wait, the only thing standing between me and an ugly death from a combination of e. Coli and Mad Cow disease are faceless bureaucrats who have no reason to care about my safety beyond its effect on their job security? And here I thought it might have something to do with food vendors eager to keep my business by not killing me.


Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online

  • Video Game Nation: How gaming is making America freer – and more fun.
  • Matt Welch: How the left turned against free speech.
  • Nothing Left to Cut? Congress can’t live within their means.
  • And much more.