The Tourist
Johnny Depp and Angelina Jolie on a road to nowhere
The Tourist is a movie that achieves a dreadful perfection. Everyone involved in it—not just the stars, Johnny Depp and Angelina Jolie, but also the director, the cinematographer, the score composer, the various writers and makeup artists, and possibly even the gaffer and the craft-service cooks—all of these people have conspired, all at once, to do their very worst work. The French and Italian accountants who conjured up the location tax breaks necessary to ease a budget reported to be in the vicinity of $100-million, and who thus enabled the picture to be made, have much to answer for as well.
Jolie plays a woman of mystery named Elise. We meet her in Paris, where she is under observation by a van full of French security operatives. In a tedious sequence that is both fittingly brief and yet much too long, we see her receiving a message at a sidewalk café from an equally mysterious man named Alexander Pearce (her onetime lover, it later turns out). The note tells her to board a train to Venice and while en route to pick out a passenger who "looks like me" and to sit with him on the trip. Those who unwisely choose to see the movie will learn that this plot point utterly scuttles the film's already preposterous conclusion.
The man Elise selects is a vacationing school teacher named Frank Tupelo (Depp). Frank can't believe his luck. Nor can we. While Elise, with her beige-on-beige designer ensembles and her heavy impasto of powder and paint, looks like an alien eminence from Planet Fashion, possibly on her way to an '80s photo shoot, Frank is a lumpy schlub with a droopy tangle of hair that suggests Jack White at the end of a long day. Will these two fall in love? Next question.
In Venice, Elise takes Frank to her glittering six-star hotel, where they spend a chaste night together. In the morning, Elise is gone, and in her place is a gang of Russian thugs in search of the elusive Alexander. Oddly, the Russkis' boss, a fellow named Ivan (Steven Berkoff), is actually British. Why should this be? Well, as someone limply explains, Ivan "surrounds himself with Russians." Ah.
There follows an awkwardly-conceived chase sequence, with Elise piloting a boat through the canals of Venice. Since she is also towing behind her a second boat with Frank onboard, this episode lacks the sort of freewheeling zing we have every right to expect. The Russians, in hot pursuit, are convinced that Frank is actually Alexander—the man who ripped off a huge sum of money from the angry Ivan. A team of English security ops who are monitoring the action know better, but by this time we've lost our will to care. The story continues on to a fancy-dress ball, where one of the most ridiculous dance interludes in recent memory takes place. I'll not go into it, or on any further.
More interesting than the movie itself, by far, is its backstory. Tom Cruise, Charlize Theron, and Sam Worthington were all at one time attached to this project, but all of them, presumably after getting a look at the script, bailed. Similar second thoughts were had by a number of directors, including the estimable Lasse Hallström. This left the field to the German director Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck, best known for his first feature, the grimly engrossing Cold War drama, The Lives of Others, which won a best-foreign-film Oscar five years ago. Here, helming material that cries out for the continental esprit of a Hitchcock or a Stanley Donen, he comes up with results that are once again, but in a different way, grim.
Jolie and Depp have no chemistry whatsoever: They look as if they've just read the script, and they go about their business with the twinkling elan of two actors waiting for their checks to clear. Not that the script, in which Henckel von Donnersmarck also had a hand, offers them any alternative. The picture has exactly two funny lines in it; the rest of the dialogue is crushingly flat. At one point Depp asks, "What made Pearce think he could take on a guy like that?" And Jolie replies, "It's just the way he is." Elsewhere, Jolie actually utters the line, "I wish we'd met in another life, Frank." Or another movie, for sure.
Kurt Loder is a writer, among other things, embedded in New York.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Tarty Jolie trumps the Falcon launch? (Shakes head)
I thought for a second that this was about the space tourists who will be going to stay at Bigelow orbital hotels in about five years via Dragon spacecraft, but I see that I was mistaken.
It's not like it was an important milestone and stark reminder of the efficiency of the private sector versus giant government agencies. We're just bitter.
I'm actually a little shocked by this snub.
Such accomplishments could become commonplace, if the Obama Administration gets its way. In February, U.S. President Barack Obama announced plans to "commercialize" America's exploration of space.
Maybe a free market initiative supported by Obama is too much for reason staff to handle emotionally?
That aspect amuses me to no end. Obama, of course, wanted to spend money on other stuff without actually--and publicly--snubbing the aerospace industry and NASA. Which led him to one of the only--maybe the only--free-marketish moves in his entire tenure in the White House.
Unintended consequences can be a good thing, too. Of course, COTS and SpaceX well predate his administration, but this policy beats the VSE.
The irony of course is that 10 years from now when middle class families from Scanton Ohio are visiting Lunar Disney on the moon he will get credit for his visionary free market initiative that allowed it.
Agreed. It's kind of like Kennedy getting ridiculous amounts of credit for the Apollo program, when he wasn't much interested in space and basically threw in the Moon as a rhetorical flourish for a speech. Others really drove that and, of course, used the dead, young president as an additional hammer to drive the program.
So... Space Exploration : Obama :: Homebrewing : Carter?
the efficiency of the private sector versus giant government agencies
It launched from Cape Canaveral under the control of NASA, the giant government "agency." NASA also contributed $500 million in cash.
Not a lot of alternatives out there, given fifty years of practically a government monopoly. Give SpaceX (and its competitors) a little time, and you'll see some serious private customers coming their way. Talk is that Bigelow is only waiting for Dragon to prove successful before launching the inflatable hotels.
This is a milestone, but the actual commercialization of space from the manned perspective is still to come.
My point being it never would have gotten off the ground without existing NASA infrastructure and substantial financial aid. So it's hardly an entirely private undertaking as some simpletons would characterize it.
Virtually nothing is, anymore. I'll take what I can get.
In any case, once private individuals and businesses are going to space, launch costs will come down, and the whole solar system may open up. The government simply cannot and will not do that for us.
Ideally, NASA will rent out its facilities to private entities and charge a fee for its support role in these launches. It bothers me, however, that tax dollars are going to private businesses so they can put millionaires into orbiting hotels. You and I will never be able to afford the ride, yet we're subsidizing it.
Not that this has anything to do with another crappy Angelina Jolie movie.
Gotta start somewhere. The key to everything is getting launch costs down. Cheap access to space will have a radical effect on just about everything.
"The key to everything is getting launch costs down."
Agreed. This is why I can't figure out why we don't have airship launchpads. Floating spacecraft to 50,000 feet and launching from there would be cheaper and safer by several orders of magnitude.
Did the Hindenburgh really sting us THAT badly? We lost the Titanic and didn't give up on steam ships.
Well, if the Hindenburg had an orchestra....
NASA accomplished a lot, but would always be too expensive for everyday stuff. Kind of like expecting the USAF to provide passenger air service. Little by little if the government allows their control to slip away....
I know you are but what am I?
"agency."
You know putting that in asshole quotes is a bit strange. You do realize that NASA is an acronym for National Aeronautics and Space AGENCY?
"Administration," retard.
I think that's the word you have in mind.
As good looking as Jolie is, if she's in a movie, you can pretty much assume it's terrible.
So you didn't like Salt, either?
I thought Salt was okay.
What's her best (movie) part?
I liked her in Catch-22, when she was still merely a potential human.
lol. Best comment of the day
Her early movies are her best, I think. Gia and Girl, Interrupted.
And I like Wanted,too. Sue me.
What the hell? Wanted is, bar none, the absolute worst movie I've ever seen. And I've seen a lot of movies.
I thought Pushing Tin was alright...I'm an aviation geek, though.
Agreed Kristen, but not because of her. Her ex-husband carried the film.
Huh? Maybe the first hour. That was one of the worst endings to a film I've ever seen.
What's her best (movie) part?
The take no gruff hot chick in Hackers.
nothing really funny here...just that was her best role she ever played.
Don't you get to see her tits in Pushing Tin?
She's nude in Taking Lives, but I don't know that it's worth watching that film to see.
That's what the internet is for.
She's "nude" in Beowulf too.
Mr & Mrs Smith.
As someone who thinks Angie looks like she just rolled out of a dumpster, I begrudgingly have to agree. Mr. & Mrs. Smith, while not a mind-bending work of art, was delightful.
Have you heard Chelsea Handler's view on Jolie? It's pretty funny.
The "she's better looking than me so I hate her" view?
Chelsea Handler... pretty funny
Does. Not. Compute.
Carlos review please.
Too bad about Donnesmark. The Lives of Others was really impressive.
We meet her in Paris, where she is under observation by a van full of French security operatives.
[Searches teh Googles for French security operative job openings.]
Jolie is a manikin. Depp is a manikin. Expect the expected.
Did I mention Archer has got the green light for another season?!?!?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3-zaTr6OUo
Archer is no Venture Bros., but it's still good stuff.
Archer is fucking awesome, in its own non-Venture right.
I saw her daddy in Runaway Train a little while ago. Pure awesome.
Voight, in his prime, was a fine actor.
It helps when he's doing Akira Kurosawa scripts, too.
They generally help. Sergio Leone could have told you about that.
To be fair, Kurosawa ripped off his best stuff, too. It goes to show that rampant piracy is good for the creative soul.
Runaway Train rules. And yet the director went on to make Tango & Cash.
I have a request..
Can Kurt loader review movies and TV shows that i have not heard about and might like.
I knew about this movie at least 2 weeks ago and like everyone else on the planet I knew I would hate it.
And yes this is a snub at all the Reason Staff who claim they know everything that was in the wikileaks cables before they were ever released.
Craft services is also getting the blame....what a cheap shot
I'll wait for the review of Tron:Legacy.
Thank you.
(I still can't seem to get the "reply to this" button to work, ever since it quit working a few weeks ago, so I'm sorry that this reply to Pro Libertate|12.10.10 @ 1:58PM is out of place.)
There was a roughly five year span between the release of Catch-22 (24 Jun 1970) and the release of Angelina Jolie (June 4, 1975) -- or at least 4 years, depending on your definition of "release." Do you really think that potential humans (can) live that long at their point of origin? If so, this may explain her baffling persistence as a celebrity.
I have not read The Tourist, but listen to my friends that this is a movie worth watching, and I will always be concerned about
Can you see the comment ?
Well said ...
More importantly, what happened to Johnny Depp? He once was one of the industry's most magnetic stars. Now, he signs up for any franchise-starter that comes his way and turns in performances that are all quirk, no acting (Alice in Wonderland) or snore-fests like The Tourist.
And why is he doing a fourth Pirates movie? Does he really need the cash?
I miss the old Depp.
You're offered what's probably the biggest paycheck of your career for a role you enjoy doing, and this time it's based on a Tim Powers novel. Maybe he's sane.
Depp is cool.
POOR DEARS,
MAYBE THEY"LL LEAVE AMERICA AND GO LIVE IN FRANCE....WHERE THEY WILL BE APPRECIATED, LIKE JERRY LEWIS....REMEMBER JOHNNY??
WHAT TURDS!!!
Wow! Just think: What if Reason told us it was a GOOD movie? Oh dear: Maybe we shouldn't think about that.
Cheap Ugg $60 Discount Ugg Boots,$60Wholesale Ugg$$$$$60
Welcome to?http://www.b2bjordans.com
The websitewholesale for many kinds of fashion shoes, like the nike,jordan,prada, also including the jeans,shirts,bags,hat and the decorations. All the products are free shipping, and the the price is competitive, and also can accept the paypal payment.,after the payment, can ship within short timefree shippingcompetitive priceany size availableaccept the paypal
we co-brand : GUCCI,FENDI,LOCASTE ,POLO,JUICY ,PRADA,ARMANI,LV,ED HARDY,DG,JUICY,ROLEX ,BURBERRY ,CHANEL, DIOR, OKLY, POLICE, VERSACE, COOGI, CHOLE, TRUE RELIGION ,ETC
shirts 16$ , jeans 35$ ,pants 25usd, sweater 25$,jacket 45$
,hangdbags price 35$ ,sunglasses 15$ belt 15$
90X Extreme Fitness System ONLY ONLY 40$$$$$$$
nike shox?jordans $32
http://www.b2bjordans.com
Why is reason publishing movie reviews? I understand the articles that highlight misconstrued political themes in movies, but I don't know why I should care what Kurt Loder thinks about a comedy.
Why not? If reason wants to branch out and post a movie review, so what? They don't have to stick with just politics and you don't have to read it. Kurt Loder is a libertarian, kinda fits.
nice post,thanks for sharing
http://www.soooogo.com
nice post,thanks for sharing
http://www.soooogo.com
http://www.louisvuitton.be/lou.....v-p-8.html This is a cool episode, it also discussed on how to enable auditing in Sharepoint and some tips on creating an end user training plan. Thanks for sharing this! I must recommend this to my officemates.
http://www.louisvuitton.be/lou.....v-p-8.html This is a cool episode, it also discussed on how to enable auditing in Sharepoint and some tips on creating an end user training plan. Thanks for sharing this! I must recommend this to my officemates.
is good
so perfect
thank u
How about mbt kisumu sandals this one: there are X driving deaths a year- what % of driving deaths (or serious injuries) involve alcohol, or other intoxicating substances? kisumu 2 People are pretty darn good drivers when they are not impaired.
good