The Beatrice Webb of Baseball
The Wall Street Journal has an interesting piece on Peter Bjarkman, a former university professor turned historian/Lord Haw Haw of Cuban baseball. Bjarkman, as Matt Welch pointed out way back in 2000, loathes the commercialization of American baseball, bellyaches about supposedly inflated salaries, and romanticizes the game of the 1950s, when the MLB wasn't fully integrated and players were routinely ripped off by management. But stadiums weren't named after private telecom companies either.
"It's a wonderful, alternative baseball universe," he says, citing the lack of commercialism, free agency and high ticket prices that mark the modern U.S. game. He says its pastoral nature recalls American baseball of the 1950s, when he was growing up following the Brooklyn Dodgers.
And the only place one can find such authenticity, as Playboy magazine pointed out last year, is in the fetid Castro dictatorship, where players are locked in their hotels during tournaments abroad to prevent them from leaving for the MLB. So Bjarkman, his critics say, has become the regime's chief baseball propagandist, which explains why he, unlike other Americans, has almost unlimited access to Cuba's top baseball talent. The Journal asked Roberto Gonzalez Echevarria, a Yale literature professor and historian of Cuban baseball, for a comment on Bjarkman: "Bjarkman echoes government propaganda, so I have nothing to say about him."
So how does he echo government propaganda? The Journal offers a few examples:
Cuban officials weren't pleased when [his book on Cuban baseball] came out in 1999.The reason: It contained two photographs of defectors, including Orlando "El Duque" Hernandez, who had become a star pitcher for the New York Yankees. Defectors didn't get official mention in Cuba. "We never would've put those in there if the publisher hadn't requested it," says Mr. Bjarkman…
After Cuban pitcher Aroldis Chapman defected last year to sign with the Cincinnati Reds for $30 million, Mr. Bjarkman wrote about the pitcher's inconsistency and limited pitch variety and said that Mr. Chapman "had considerable trouble even qualifying" for the national team. Before the player defected, Mr. Bjarkman had described him in his online column as a "stellar flamethrower" and a "phenom" likely to be the No. 2 starter on the Cuban team.
"Cubans who read his column are fed up with it," says Roberto Moralejo, a 30-year-old civil engineer in Miami who left Cuba 11 years ago.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
So, baseball in Cuba looks like something from the '50s -- doesn't everything?
All except for Castro and Che, yep, pretty much.
When it comes to Cuban baseball one of the major lessons to be gleaned is how quickly the Dominican Republic raced by it in terms of talent once Cuban baseball was closed off to the rest of the world while Dominican baseball became a pipeline to it.
The millions to be made playing baseball were directly cited by Sammy Sosa as the main reason he took the game up at 10 years old and dedicated himself to it like he did. Unencumbered by the Catsro regime in Cuba and the Amateur draft in the states, the Dominican Republic became a free for all talent pipeline that teams invested heavy amounts of money.
The model was later exported to Venezuela with smashing success, but political concerns in that country has cooled off that process.
Recently baseball officials in Puerto Rico have complained about Puerto Rican players being covered by the amateur draft as it then removes the incentives for teams to make similar investments in baseball in that country.
Both the Cuban model and the American model (the amateur draft) inhibits player development, whereas the "exploitative" model of negotiating with teenagers for their services as baseball players generally results in higher caliber players and eventually more money for those players.
There's obviously some problems with agent corruption and the like in the DR, but a great number of those guys have been caught and dealt with, and IMO the good far outweighs the bad.
how quickly the Dominican Republic raced by it in terms of talent
Not to mention cigars.
And great vaginas.
I think some teams are trying to move into developing Colombian baseball players as an alternative to Venezuela, because Colombia is so much more safe and stable (and free) than Venezuela is.
The problem is fundamentally the state of soccer in each country. Venezuelan soccer continues to struggle (relative to the rest of South America). The Colombian National soccer team has underachieved (they should be alongside the Brazilians and Argentines as the giants in the region, but aren't), but the sport is nevertheless obscenely popular in the country and is an obstacle for baseball growth.
I don't really want to intersect baseball with politics too much, but whatever else you want to say about him, Chavez has seemed to have hurt the development of Venezuelan baseball simply by being Hugo Chavez and making teams skittish about doing business down there. Maybe those fears are a little paranoid, but you can't hardly blame them for having them.
San Pedro de Marcoris, DR is an amazing place. IIRC, 1 major leaguer for about every 5000 people in the city.
Of course, there arent many other 6 or 7 figure job possibilities there.
There's a Dominican saying that you can't walk off the island; you need to hit your way off.
I love that saying. And that is why Dominican players tend to be free swingers. I like that. A lot more entertaining to watch someone hit the ball than be a sabremetric beloved fat guy getting walks.
I'm enough of a baseball geek to appreciate plate discipline (Yoooooouuuuk!), but yeah there's something exciting about watching a guy who swings out of his shoes on anything he thinks he can touch.
Aroldis Chapman = 105mph fastball
We'll find a place for him.
Yet another reason to love capitalism!
Bjarkman, the Walter Duranty of baseball reporters?
Not even in the same ballpark, so to speak.
I would say "the jocks' Michael Moore."
Why does it pain so many people that athletes might want to be paid for their efforts? This applies to fools like this guy (see below) and milder fools that seem enamored with the NCAA and it's "amateur" athletics mythos.
Anybody who "romanticizes" anything about the Cuban dictatorship is a world class fool.
Or worse.
Right MNG, no romanticizing. Only making America more like Cuba is allowed.
ah, the good old days of pre-commercial base ball when you could grow up rooting for a team whose outfield fence looked like this... the good old days when your team was an annual title contender and didn't have to worry about losing key players to the competition who was otherwise relegated to second division finishes year in and out... fun times those were...
Thanks to Connie Mack, they did have Florida Marlin-style "talent dumps," however.
Cuban baseball, bashing of Peter Bjarkman, and a Voros McCracken sighting -- this page has it all.
The progressives of your time show some serious love for the slave trade. Hell, come to think of it, they loved it back in my day too! You like your players underpaid, the (mis)fortune of their genetics determining their caste and occupation in society, barred from travel under threat of being shot, and your rustic, authentic scenery, Bjarkman? Well, you would have fell in love with an antebellum cotton plantation. Kick up your heels and whistle some Dixie you shit for brains bastard.
I can't vouch for the quality of his writing (although Cuban emigres in the majors do have a pronounced tendency toward being overrated), but shilling for Cuban baseball is not analogous to doing radio broadcasts cheering on the Luftwaffe during the Battle of Britain. Some perspective, please.
If you think I'm going to do a jive shuffle on your front porch, slaver, you can fucking kiss my ass.
Yup, it's only analogous to propagandizing for Stalin, not for Hitler.
He's not the worst, but he is the latest in a series of moderately affluent douches who find poverty charming. It may be charming to visit, but you sure as hell don't want to live there.
Was just in Sint Maarten at end of October (new country as of 10/10/10!, I brought home a copy of their constitution, I need to fisk its awfulness sometime). You know what I liked about visiting there? There are trying hard to not live in poverty.
A large percent of the service industry was from other islands, because they are moving to where the jobs are.
It is an analogy you man raping bigfoot. And it is a good one. Propagandizing for the enslavement (yes since they can't leave the Island Cubans are slaves) and enforced poverty of people (nice that this clown expects Cuban baseball players to forgo millions in the major leagues for his entertainment) for your enjoyment is about as low as it gets.
Ever notice how these pompous self-styled intellectuals always seem to romanticize the Brooklyn Dodgers? Must be some sort of baby boomer SWPL-nuerosis.
I have noticed that to. Pompous lefties tend to be Dodger fans or if they are younger Red Sox fans. It is very odd. And of course the romanticizing of the Dodgers is ridiculous. They were a team like any other. They benefited from the reserve clause and were able to pay their players way less than they were worth. And they won one world title during their golden age from 1941 to 1957. The same number that the Giants and the Indians did during that era. And fewer than the St. Louis Cardinals. In 1951 they gagged away one of the largest pennant leads in baseball history. And of course were absent one year completely owned by the Yankees.
Obviously Jackie Robinson has a whole lot to do with the Dodgers reverence. Also, even though they only won the one series, they were perennial contenders for a long time. Sort of the "Golden Age" version of the 1990's Braves.
And yeah I agree that lefties tend to congregate toward those two teams, although I'm a die-hard Sox fan and make no apologies for it.
The color barrier was going to be broken eventually. They just happened to be the first and not by much. The way people deify Robinson and ignore Larry Doby who went through just as much drives me crazy.
Yeah, people are just weird like that. Robinson was indeed admirable, but he's just one person among several generations of black ballplayers who struggled with those dynamics both before and after 1947. Robinson's achievements were built upon the shoulders of hundreds of world-class ballplayers who not only had to put up with a color barrier, but never stayed in the game long enough to get to the other side. To think what guys like Josh Gibson sacrificed so that one day Jackie Robinson could play in the bigs boggles the mind.
Or Joe Louis. Had there never been a Joe Louis, who in the late 1930s as a black man was the most popular athlete in America, there would have never been a Jackie Robinson.