Gun Rights and the 2010 House Races

Using letter grades assigned by the National Rifle Association, the Independence Institute's David Kopel (read his Reason archive here) has a highly detailed breakdown of what the upcoming House elections might mean for gun rights. It's not an easily excerpt-able document, so why not read the whole thing for yourself over at The New Ledger.

Comments

[SIV]

It's not an easily excerpt-able document, so why not read the whole thing for yourself over at The New Ledger.

Laziest post award winner!!!

[wayne]

not easy to excerpt or understand.

[CE]

Barbara Boxer has an anti-Fiorina ad running that says Carly is "too extreme for California" because she wouldn't ban "assault weapons"..... Thanks Ms. Boxer -- I wouldn't have guessed that Fiorina might be worth voting for without your help.

[strat]

Mr. Kopel should have also taken the opportunity to castigate the NRA for refusing to grade third-party candidates even when there are clearly better 2nd Amendment supporters in races than the R or D. Virginia's 11th district is a good example this year.

[Isaac Bartram]

The NRA routinely ignores third party candidates because they are "unelectable".

Likewise they favor incumbents over challengers with equal NRA scores.