Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Reason Writers Killin' it on Parker Spitzer: Nick Gillespie Talks About the Politics of Government Spending

Matt Welch | 10.12.2010 10:13 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Here's Reason.com and Reason.tv Editor Nick Gillespie on the boob tube last night:

Transcript here.

Thanks to notorious commenters Flex Nasty B.I.G. and Tman for the links.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Reason on the Tube: Nick Gillespie Talkin' Midterm Blues

Matt Welch is an editor at large at Reason.

PoliticsCultureGovernment SpendingTelevisionReason
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (44)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Warty   15 years ago

    How did you resist the urge to call Spitzer human garbage, Nick?

    1. Episiarch   15 years ago

      If Nick could just get Spitzer to hit him, he'd become a millionaire overnight. How hard can it be to get that piece of shit to take a swing at you? "Hey Elliott, banged any talkative hookers lately?"

      1. ?   15 years ago

        Why the fixation on violence? Or is it a fetish?

        1. Warty   15 years ago

          Some people deserve only violence, spade. Like Epi.

      2. JoshINHB   15 years ago

        I was expecting Spitzer to try dry humping K Parker while the adults where talking policy.

    2. mrzitro   15 years ago

      lol!

  2. Tim   15 years ago

    Is Cartoon Network still drawing better ratings?

  3. Colin   15 years ago

    Sadly, they edited out the dramatic leather-jacket walk-in intro:

    If only they could've edited out Kathleen Parker and Eliot Spitzer.

    1. Tim   15 years ago

      Bingo.

  4. Mainer   15 years ago

    It doesn't bode well for Parker and Spitzer that anyone tuning in mid-show would most likely think that Gillespie is the host.

    1. Rudan   15 years ago

      This topic has more comments than Spitzer has viewers.

  5. R C Dean   15 years ago

    One Jacket to rule them all . . . .

    1. Aresen   15 years ago

      Yeah, Nick without The Jacket is like Sauron without the Ring.

    2. ?   15 years ago

      ...in the land of Teevee where the Spitzers lie.

  6. Spiny Norman   15 years ago

    You know, I'm not surprised that Spitzer is back in the public eye, with no apparent sense of embarrassment. I figured that he'd eventually write a book or become a consultant or something. People like that rarely disappear completely, no matter how much we might want them to.

    But chatty TV host? Did not see that coming.

    1. Tim   15 years ago

      Yeah, you'd think Spitzer would be a natural for some porny HBO production.

    2. CatoTheElder   15 years ago

      If Dick Morris could do it on Fox, Spitzer could easily do it on CNN.

  7. Ernie the Bear   15 years ago

    "Fringe Goes Mainstream"? I have seen The Jacket. It may have Nick Gillespie, but it does not have Fringe. There is, however, some Anti-Jacket that turns up on Fox News, occasionally, with a lawyer on the inside, and fringe on the outside. I like the Fringe Anti-Jacket. It makes me laugh. I think it may be the one that used to own Dennis Hopper.

  8. Marshall Gill   15 years ago

    Thanks to notorious commenters Flex Nasty B.I.G. and Tman for the links.

    Science, what would one have to do to be notorious on this site?

    1. Flex Nasty B.I.G.   15 years ago

      I could tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.

  9. emerson   15 years ago

    It was nice of Nick to let the three of them come on his show.

  10. heller   15 years ago

    The Jacket pwned.

  11. micsolana   15 years ago

    Jesus. Nick just kicked some ass.

  12. Tman   15 years ago

    Gillespie completely outflanked the entire panel on this show. Ridley wanted to bitch about the racisty racist Tea Party racists but he had to admit that Gillespie was right that people should be pissed off right now at what government is doing, from either side of Team Red/Blue, so he couldn't pull out his pissed off black man schtick.

    Spitzer is honestly just embarrassing. Every word out of his mouth reminds me of what an overzealous douchebag he was when he was AG. I thank the whore gods that he get exposed before the economy tanked because he would have ridden that populist anti-Wall Street crusade all the way to the top and then our nanny state would've been replaced by a big brother state that would've made us long for the days of the Frank/Dodd clown show.

    I have no idea why anyone either reads, watches or listens to Kathleen Parker though. She combines the worst of the RINO tendencies with that annoying desire to be hip and inclusive among the liberal elites ("hey, I voted for Obama TOO!").

    I'd say Nick hit a home run with this appearance, but this crowd wasn't even AA ball.

    1. Flex Nasty B.I.G.   15 years ago

      They really should give him his own show on CNN.

  13. Flex Nasty B.I.G.   15 years ago

    It's good to see a Reason presence on CNN instead of Fox News. IMHO, we libertarians should be reaching the former's viewers, and distancing ourselves from those of the latter.

    1. Woodrow   15 years ago

      CNN is so desperate, they are starting to admit that maybe libertarians aren't all the spawn of Satan.

    2. Tman   15 years ago

      I agree that a Gillespie show on CNN would be a million different kinds of awesome. But Fox gave us Stossell, which is closer than anything Libertarians have ever come near in terms of presenting libertarian ideals to a mainstream audience.

      1. zoltan   15 years ago

        True, unfortunately Stossel is on FBN and not the as-popular Fox News Channel.

  14. Chinny Chin Chin   15 years ago

    I envision Gillespie walking into Welch's office and saying, "Matt, I was on TV last night, and want to pimp the appearance on H&R. But my name is in the post byline, it'll look self-aggrandizing, and those punks in the commentariat will kill me. Be a good trooper and post it for me? The jacket wrote this text to accompany."

    1. Matt Welch   15 years ago

      Either that, or he was on the train!

      1. Spiny Norman   15 years ago

        Government-funded Amtrak? Oh, my.

        1. Sean   15 years ago

          When the jacket calls the fire department because his house is burning down, he does so reluctantly.

    2. Tulpa   15 years ago

      What I don't get is why Reason needed commenters to supply links to their video-tentacle boss's TV appearances. Did Nick not want anyone to know he went on Spitzer?

    3. johnl   15 years ago

      Really after reading that you think there might be something that appears too self-aggrandizing for Nick?

  15. DJK   15 years ago

    The Nick Gillespie Show, with the whore-banger and some other folks.

    1. Apogee   15 years ago

      +10

      1. Tanya   15 years ago

        This.

  16. Rimfax   15 years ago

    Nick did own the presence, but they successfully acted as if he was on a different plane of existence. The substance of their replies always returned to why Obama's not getting the 'true' message out to the disaffected proles. It was almost a non sequitor dialog.

  17. Mosquevite Sandwich   15 years ago

    Well, it's doubtful you'll be invited back before the show is cancelled. Nice job, Nick - it surpassed the nanny beatdown you gave Mimi Roth.

    Spitzer Parker is an utter joke of show.

  18. Daze   15 years ago

    Nice to see libertarian ideas out there in prime time, but I just can't stand that "everyone talk at once, and talk superfast to squeeze your point in" format. How does anyone watch an entire episode without getting a migraine?

    Plus Eliot Spitzer is a moron even by party hack pundit standards.

  19. jasno   15 years ago

    Nice job Nick although I disagree on one point - I don't really think Americans are pissed off at spending per se, they're pissed about spending with no results. Not that I agree with that, but most Americans aren't libertarians.

  20. johnl   15 years ago

    Thanks for the post Jeffe that was an amazing performance. One oral typo (at least as it shows in the transcript) is that we are at the beginning of the 10th year in Afghanistan, not at the 10th anniversary.

  21. mrzitro   15 years ago

    Poor Nick. Only 389K people watched his brilliance that night. With ratings that low for Parker Spitz, maybe Nick can make a pitch to CNN that he'd be a ratings winner w/his own show @ that time slot.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Everything Got Worse During COVID

Christian Britschgi | 6.4.2025 1:15 PM

Mountainhead Is a Shallow Satire of Tech Billionaires

Peter Suderman | 6.4.2025 1:05 PM

New Ruling Moves Oregon Closer to Legal In-Home Psilocybin Use

Autumn Billings | 6.4.2025 11:40 AM

A First Amendment Right To Preach Orgasm?

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 6.4.2025 11:25 AM

Schumer Attacks Trump for Repeating Obama's Iran Diplomacy

Matthew Petti | 6.4.2025 10:17 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!