Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Policy

Reason Writers on TV: Matt Welch Talks Stadium Swindleage on Russia Today

Matt Welch | 8.31.2010 5:20 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

On Aug. 27, I talked to our friendly neighborhood Russkies about stadium welfare for lying billioniare baseball owners. Approximately 5.58322 minutes.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: For God's Sake, Don't Cut The Football Team! & Other Stories From Budgetpocalypse

Matt Welch is an editor at large at Reason.

PolicyCultureCorporate WelfareSports
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (84)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Pro Libertate   15 years ago

    I'm dubious about your ability to measure time so precisely. [Stomps off in a huff]

    1. Paul   15 years ago

      The CBO demands more exacting figures after they got burned on Obamacare.

      1. Pro Libertate   15 years ago

        Ah, but see below for the shocking truth.

  2. The Gobbler   15 years ago

    "Approximately 5.58322 minutes." 🙂

    1. silent v   15 years ago

      5:58 would be closer to 5.96666 minutes.

      1. Pro Libertate   15 years ago

        See! Slovenly timekeepingmanship.

        1. Paul   15 years ago

          I think its "Timekeepsmanship".

          1. Pro Libertate   15 years ago

            You make up your own words, and I'll make up mine.

  3. affenkopf   15 years ago

    Russia must be a really libertarian state judging from how ofen they have libertarians on their government propaganda stations. I'm sure they are equally outraged by the fact that the Russian government either directly or indirectly bankrolls most Russian Premier League teams.

    1. rac   15 years ago

      But their teams aren't "hysterically profitable".

    2. grrizzly   15 years ago

      For the first time in my adult life, I'm proud of Russian TV. 🙂

  4. Pro Libertate   15 years ago

    I just watched a movie where the Russian government was really bad and had it out for the U.S. And it wasn't set during the Cold War!

    1. Episiarch   15 years ago

      So it wasn't Reds, then.

      1. Pro Libertate   15 years ago

        No, no. I saw that movie, too. The Russians were godlike in their goodness and benevolence in Reds.

        1. Episiarch   15 years ago

          Was it Russkies?

          1. Pro Libertate   15 years ago

            No, and before you ask, it wasn't Little Nikita, either.

            1. sloopyinca   15 years ago

              And what did Prince Andrei do at the end? Yeah, yeah, I read the book though.

              1. Pro Libertate   15 years ago

                Not War and Peace.

            2. Episiarch   15 years ago

              Cloak & Dagger?

              1. Pro Libertate   15 years ago

                Not Cold War Russia!

                1. Episiarch   15 years ago

                  D.A.R.Y.L.? Come on, man, work with me here.

                  1. Pro Libertate   15 years ago

                    It's connected in some way with Milo Minderbinder.

            3. sloopyinca   15 years ago

              Or perhaps it was "The Last Days of Hitler?" They had it in for us by then and the Cold War technically didn't start till after Potsdam.

              1. Pro Libertate   15 years ago

                More recent.

                1. sloopyinca   15 years ago

                  "The Bourne Stupidity" or one of the others in that line?

                  1. Pro Libertate   15 years ago

                    No. Did that involve the Russian government?

                    1. sloopyinca   15 years ago

                      The Saint? This is getting to be a pain in the ass.

                    2. Pro Libertate   15 years ago

                      No, but Episiarch will appreciate the Val Kilmer reference.

                    3. Episiarch   15 years ago

                      Unfortunately, you've put me in a catch-22, ProL, as I wasn't very happy with The Saint. I consider it to be a part of Val's later 90's post-Heat decline, starting with Dr. Moreau.

                    4. Pro Libertate   15 years ago

                      Yes, there is good Val and not-so-good Val. Can good Val be restored, or has he gone to the same place that Coppola went? Not Nick Coppola--he never did much good, except for that Coen thing.

                    5. Episiarch   15 years ago

                      I think he can be restored. I enjoyed his cameo on Entourage as a weed supplier, but that was years ago now.

                      He needs the right role, that's all.

                    6. Pro Libertate   15 years ago

                      I thought he was okay in that quirky movie with Iron Man.

                    7. Pro Libertate   15 years ago

                      Kiss Kiss Bang Bang before we get started.

    2. Paul   15 years ago

      Dr Zhivago?

      1. Paul   15 years ago

        A video of mail-order brides you picked up at a flea market? For the love of God Pro-L, throw us a frickin' bone, here!

        1. Pro Libertate   15 years ago

          I did with the Milo Minderbender reference.

          1. BakedPenguin   15 years ago

            Runaway Train?

            1. Pro Libertate   15 years ago

              Jon Voight fathered Angelina Jolie, who starred in Salt.

        2. sloopyinca   15 years ago

          It's gotta be something with Jon Voight in it. The ODESSA File?

          1. Pro Libertate   15 years ago

            No. But closer.

            1. dbcooper   15 years ago

              How many mustaches are in the movie?

              1. sloopyinca   15 years ago

                This better be a real movie. If you come out with some Jack Bauer bullshit and say it was a movie instead of a 2-hour episode, I'm gonna be very disappointed.

            2. BlueBook   15 years ago

              Salt. Haven't seen it, but it fits.

              1. sloopyinca   15 years ago

                I bet you're right, but I thought in Salt, the Rissian government wasn't evil so much as it was a few rogue ex-KGBers who set it all in motion.

                Meh. Angelina Jolie hasn't done anything of significance since Gia anyway.

                1. sloopyinca   15 years ago

                  The Night of the Generals?

                  You need to give it to us soon, Pro L, or we're gonna start trying to find out where you live.

                  1. Pro Libertate   15 years ago

                    Salt. I overstated the malignity of the government, though I think it's implied that elements of the government supported the evilness.

                    I thought it was okay, though the usual logic-stretching occurred. But I like Bond films, usually.

                    1. sloopyinca   15 years ago

                      You ass.
                      I was thinking that government involvement actually meant government involvement. I guess I'm still learning my way around H&R.

                    2. Pro Libertate   15 years ago

                      No, it's my fault. I actually wasn't worrying much about accuracy, because I was just making a throwaway comment. The guessing game was not my intent.

                      I'd entertained the notion of saying it was Eat, Pray, Love, but that would've been offensive.

  5. Jeff B.   15 years ago

    Thank you for being precise length of the interview.

  6. Pro Libertate   15 years ago

    I just watched part of the video. I had no idea that I understood Russian. Why, in my head, it sounded just like American English. Huh!

    To make at least one on-topic comment, I hope cities will stop paying the protection money to sports team owners. Fuck 'em. I like my local sports teams, but I'm not willingly paying a dime more than it takes to go to the occasional game or to buy a hat or t-shirt.

  7. The Other Kevin   15 years ago

    Not interested in the subject, but I'll watch anyway because I always thought that anchor was hot.

  8. Cool Cal   15 years ago

    I really hope someone (Matt?) will, at long last, answer my question: aside from the obvious fact of her unforgivable hotness, why are Reason staffers habitually on The Alyona Show?

    1. Matt Welch   15 years ago

      They ask, and they're close by.

      1. Paul   15 years ago

        Is the the second part that plays most important? Like, if I lived next door, would I be on the show? Be brutal, I can take it.

      2. Cool Cal   15 years ago

        Awe...I was expecting something with a bit more intrigue. Something, shall we say, more Koch-esque: as in, Reason happens to be the eminence grise of Russia Today and that Alyona herself is a secret libertarian.

        1. BakedPenguin   15 years ago

          Considering that she asked "is this just a part of capitalism?" about a crony/theft deal, I'd say secret libertarian isn't in the cards.

          Unless that was a deliberate set-up softball question, of course. (No pun intended).

  9. dbcooper   15 years ago

    This is pretty amusing:

    http://jezebel.com/5626734/wom.....t#comments

    Michelle Greer, a web marketing strategist, made the mistake of commenting on Tech Crunch's article in response to the lack of females in tech. And she got reamed out.

    "Yo, my math SAT score was, in all probability, higher than yours... Leadership takes all sorts of forms. It just surrounds itself in talent that makes up for where it lacks," she posted.

    After defending women entrepreneurs and their math abilities, Greer was called illogical, idiotic, arrogant, angry, a troll, and the "c" word.

    Greer, who has had a successful career as former Senior Manager of Corporate Communications at Rackspace, cried for 20 minutes in the shower over the hurtful words. She has demanded commenters be reprimanded for defamation.

    If she was reduced to that by Techcrunch then lets hope she never encounters H&R ...

    1. Episiarch   15 years ago

      So you've become another one of the people who can't stop reading Jezebel? You're quite the masochist, I see.

      1. dbcooper   15 years ago

        In my defense:

        (a) I saw it on gawker, not the jezebel site.

        (b) SugarFree is an insidious, evil little bastard.

        1. Episiarch   15 years ago

          You forgot the "no homo" after saying "I saw it on gawker".

          Yes, NutraSweet is dangerous. Luckily I'm far too much of a sadist and too little of a masochist to enjoy those sites, so I'm safe.

    2. Fire Tiger   15 years ago

      Huh huh huh huh You said Rackspace.

      1. Yurop   15 years ago

        Fuck, I was too late.

        1. Fire Tiger   15 years ago

          I am denying any responsibility for said condition and am immediately requesting a paternity test.

    3. Paul   15 years ago

      cried for 20 minutes in the shower over the hurtful words. She has demanded commenters be reprimanded for defamation.

      She may have unwittingly stumbled on the answer to her question.

    4. zeroentitlement   15 years ago

      Greer, a web marketing strategist...who has had a successful career as former Senior Manager of Corporate Communications

      So she's a PR flunkie. Which makes me wonder why she bothered to respond to the article. Just because your paychecks have a tech firm's name on them doesn't make you a techie. The night janitor at Rackspace also works in tech, by her definition.

      1. Paul   15 years ago

        Word. Maria Cantwell ran Real Networks. I'll bet Cantwell can't figure out how her flashlight works.

    5. JW   15 years ago

      Michelle Greer, a web marketing strategist, made the mistake of commenting on Tech Crunch's article in response to the lack of females in tech

      Let me straighten this out for you, you aren't "in tech." You're a limited-talent PR/marketing troll for a (pretty decent) co-lo company. The company is "in tech," not you.

      Now, if you could set up the web servers, lock them down, design and code the site and set up the CMS system, THEN you'll be "in tech." Until then, you're the idiot help who's technical skills fully consist of knowing how to turn on her jerkPhone.

    6. Harrigan   15 years ago

      Studying computing science, I can assure everyone there is a severe lack of women in IT.

      The ratio is absurd... in some classes there is literally not even one woman. And if there is an actual cute girl in a comp sci class the 100+ guys in class have cause to celebrate and often do.

      1. zoltan   15 years ago

        Chicks don't want to be in a class with a bunch of fat, ugly nerds. That's why I take online programming courses.

  10. Pro Libertate   15 years ago

    Rackspace? Is that one of those new companies that employ crazy advertising gimmicks?

  11. Steven Smith   15 years ago

    Why are the Russians interested in what would appear to be an internal American "scandal" in a middle-tier sport they don't even play over there?

  12. Steven Smith   15 years ago

    Also, why were you being interviewed on the subject by Rachael Ray?

    1. BakedPenguin   15 years ago

      It wasn't Rachael Ray. You couldn't see her ass on screen.

    2. Episiarch   15 years ago

      EVEN STEVE(N) SMITH NOT LIKE RACHEL RAY! NOT EVEN FOR RAPING! BUT SHE NOT GET MESSAGE! WHY SHE STILL HAVE SHOW? WHO WATCHES HER? STEVE(N) CONFUSED AND ANGRY!

      1. BakedPenguin   15 years ago

        Actually, I agree with Sir Mix-A-Lot on that count. I can watch her show, so long as the sound is off.

        1. Episiarch   15 years ago

          I don't find her cute at all; I just find her grating and irritating, even with the sound off. She makes obnoxious facial expressions.

          1. JW   15 years ago

            Rachel Ray still wouldnt be sexy or cute even if she consumed both Heidi Klum and Laetitia Casta in one sitting.

            1. Pro Libertate   15 years ago

              I concur and further note a total lack of understanding for any other opinion on the topic.

          2. Nipplemancer   15 years ago

            punchable face, fuckable ass.

          3. Nipplemancer   15 years ago

            punchable face, fuckable ass.

  13. Tastes food...   15 years ago

    Yummers!

  14. Robert   15 years ago

    That woman is HOT!

    I can't believe no one has asked the obvious question of whether or not Welch took her out back after the show and did her up the wrong 'un. Come on, Matt, we'll keep your secret!

    Yes, Welch is married but we all know anal doesn't count.

  15. Mr Whipple   15 years ago

    I don't agree with using public money to fund private stadiums, but Norman Braman is a dick, and if he ever shows his face in Philadelphia again, it will probably be the last place he ever shows his face. Seriously, people still loathe him, here. And if you want to align yourself with him, Matt, then you are a dick, as well. And that little hottie can suck my dick, but I digress.

    The only good thing Norman Braman ever did for the Philadelphia Eagles, was hire Buddy Ryan.

    - Buddy Ryan

    But I guess Eagle's fans get the last laugh, because he lost a shitload of money to Bernie Madoff.

    I would gladly sacrifice my libertarian principles to piss in the face of Norman Braman.

    Buddy Ryan was the lowest paid coach in the NFL while Braman paid himself $7.5 million and referred to his salary as a 'few dollars.' The book further notes:

    ... he [Braman] owned the team to torture us [fans]. Mr Braman was a soulless, cold-blooded auto salesman who could have easily stood in for Lionel Barrymore in the role of "It's A Wonderful Life"s' Mr Potter.

    If you don't know Braman's history with the Marlins, I suggest you do some research.

  16. Some Guy   15 years ago

    Russia covers baseball?

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Making GLP-1s Available Over the Counter Can Unlock Their Full Potential

Jeffrey A. Singer | From the June 2025 issue

Bob Menendez Does Not Deserve a Pardon

Billy Binion | 5.30.2025 5:25 PM

12-Year-Old Tennessee Boy Arrested for Instagram Post Says He Was Trying To Warn Students of a School Shooting

Autumn Billings | 5.30.2025 5:12 PM

Texas Ten Commandments Bill Is the Latest Example of Forcing Religious Texts In Public Schools

Emma Camp | 5.30.2025 3:46 PM

DOGE's Newly Listed 'Regulatory Savings' for Businesses Have Nothing to Do With Cutting Federal Spending

Jacob Sullum | 5.30.2025 3:30 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!