Earmark Transparency
In March the New Direction Congress® announced a ban on earmarks for businesses. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) was brimming with pride:
When Democrats assumed the majority of Congress in 2007, we pledged to place people ahead of lobbyists and the public interest before special interests. Over the last three years, we fought to replace a culture of corruption with a new direction of transparency and accountability, including earmark reforms in the last Congress.
Today's proposal totally bans corporate earmarks—critical reform that addresses concerns that many Americans have. It ensures that for-profit companies no longer reap the rewards of congressional earmarks and limits the influence of lobbyists on Members of Congress. This ban will ensure good stewardship of taxpayer dollars by the federal government across all agencies.
The ban had an immediate impact. Companies can no longer obtain millions of dollars in taxpayer subsidies simply by persuading a congressman to slip a few words into a spending bill. Now they have to set up a nonprofit front group first.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
As a mom and a grandma, I am committed to making sure you have every opportunity imaginable.
Companies Find Ways to Bypass Ban on Earmarks
...and get earmarks attached to bills and pass those bills and take money from us and wind it through the bureaucracy and send it to themselves.
Ah, the Times.
RTFA
The Times article is seriously harsh on the Congresscritters who request the tainted earmarks, too.
Radley's upcoming post is not the killer you are expecting. He must be keeping his powder dry.
Money seeks STILL seeks out power?
Makes ::shocked:: face.
Today's Chronicle of Higer Ed has an article on earmarks "With Help From Universities, Companies Get Around Earmark Ban"
When Democrats assumed the majority of Congress in 2007, we pledged to place people ahead of lobbyists and the public interest before special interests.
*outright, prolonged laughter*
Funny how all this money laundering and earmarking goes on without any involvement from Congress at all.
The Earmark War looks a lot like the Drug War.
LOL, rest assured todays bought and paid for lawmakers will find a way around it.
Lou
http://www.anonymous-vpn.be.tc
That's why I love Yes Minister! It shows all of the round about ways that special interests, the government itself included naturally corrupt the system. In fact, the more control that the government has over the businesses, the more businesses control the government. Especially during the era of mass unionization, the interests of government, business, and unions were more united than ever.
I like it very much, thank you
custom jerseys
cheap custom jerseys
i like eat~~67sd8gh
So wonderful~~SCFCHU64
on the busy way DT45DIFD