Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Friday Funnies

Myths about the Tea Party movement

Chip Bok | 4.23.2010 7:00 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Bang Bang

Chip Bok
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (104)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Jordan Elliot   16 years ago

    Not entirely sure how I feel about this one. I want to like it, but something is telling me to hold back.

    In any event, hope y'all have a great weekend.

    1. Yonemoto   16 years ago

      it's that he forgot the "I" in both "prairie" and "privileged"

      1. Groovus Maximus   16 years ago

        The eye is in "prairie" (granted very hard to see).

        "Privileged" is misspelled. Perhaps on purpose, to emphasize the the ignorance and bigotry the speaker as an ironic device.

        Slightly amusing.

        1. Groovus Maximus   16 years ago

          eye = I. Was reading a chart while posting. Probably an RC'z law somehow.

        2. Warren   16 years ago

          I see the latter "i" but not the former no matter how hard I look

          1. Isaac Bartram   16 years ago

            Same here.

            The misspelling of pra[i]rie was the first thing i noticed. But I missed privleged completely.

            1. Groovus Maximus   16 years ago

              See below comment to Tulpa.

        3. Tulpa   16 years ago

          There are two I's in PRAIRIE. But it's nice that you try to take the best possible view of other people's work, even when they don't deserve it.

          1. Groovus Maximus   16 years ago

            Heh, you are right. I'm a 'tard.

      2. Jordan Elliot   16 years ago

        See, I was thinking that may have been purposely done. Not sure.

      3. Tulpa   16 years ago

        Looks like he almost forgot the "I" in POPULISTS the first panel. Look at the difference in letter arrangement between the two panels' POPULISTs -- the one in the first panel looks like it was added in after the word was already written.

        1. Groovus Maximus   16 years ago

          Perhaps it's a gestalt/grok submission.

      4. Thorbie   16 years ago

        I'm not going to give him a hard time over the mistake. I've worked as a political cartoonist for student newspapers for many years. When you have to draw each letter and center each line yourself, sometimes a few letters get lost along the way. It has happened to me several times. Usually I catch it after I'm done and have to fix it in photoshop.

        Try writing out a sentence by separating it into 3-4 lines. Now start lettering in the center outward to the left and right of each line. It can happen. When cartooning, the left brain can switch off and the right brain is switched on.

  2. MikeP   16 years ago

    I came. I saw. I chuckled.

  3. kilroy   16 years ago

    True but not really funny.

  4. TheOtherSomeGuy   16 years ago

    Would have been more entertaining if you'd thrown the word "racist" in there about fifteen times.

  5. anarch   16 years ago

    More Liberal icons needed: lattes, NPR swag to complement her 'do, some obvious and obviously false slogan on the lampshade...

    (Everyone's a critic!)

  6. Maverick   16 years ago

    Maybe some SEC types who have fap fap noise markers and a house burning down around them. I would've laughed at that one.

  7. Fist of Etiquette   16 years ago

    I give this marriage another three months.

  8. JW   16 years ago

    Why is the rational person holding the Times? That confuses me.

    1. Jen   16 years ago

      I was thinking the same thing. +10

  9. Ray Butlers   16 years ago

    Not a peep of protest from angry white men with racist signs until the black guy moved into the white house. Coincidence.

    1. SugarFree   16 years ago

      Anyone else hear a baby crying?

      1. .   16 years ago

        I thought it was a rhino farting.

        1. SugarFree   16 years ago

          Maybe it was a baby rhino crying from gastrointestinal pressure.

    2. Coldstream   16 years ago

      If only John Edwards or Hillary Clinton had been elected President, then all these angry white men would have been a-ok with the spending.

      1. Draco   16 years ago

        That's a really great reply, Coldstream, and should be our standard quip when confronted with the "Ray Butlers Snark."

      2. ogoggilby   16 years ago

        If Hillary had been elected President, then all those angry racist white men would be deemed angry sexist white men.

    3. Untermensch   16 years ago

      Don't feed trolls, I know, but you must have missed the backlash against *white* Republicans over the bailout by their constituents during the closing of the Bush years. But hey, why let historical fact get in the way of a pat and tendentious theory that allows you to feel smugly superior while your side loots the country?

      1. .   16 years ago

        Trolls have no agenda, silly. It's a sickness.

      2. cmace   16 years ago

        Maybe you didn't notice the election results last fall

        1. Untermensch   16 years ago

          To whom was that addressed? If to me, your point is what exactly? If to Ray Butlers, it makes sense.

          1. Ray Butlers   16 years ago

            It doesn't really matter. Neither of you make a lick of sense.

    4. John   16 years ago

      Sort of like the people who never said a word when they were writing plays about the assination of the President and Craig Kilborn was showing a picture of the President saying "assasins wanted" and John Glenn was saying that the President was "just doing that Hitler business again" but now think that everyone owes the President and his office respect.

      1. Ray Butlers   16 years ago

        Perhaps so, but where was the Astroturf? lol. It doesn't matter since the topic is the anti-Obama protesters who should be held accountable regardless of what happened in the past.

        1. Jimmy 'Crack' Corn   16 years ago

          Held accountable for what?

    5. Occam's Razor   16 years ago

      Not a peep of protest from angry white men Republicans and Republican-leaning independents with racist political signs until the black guy Democrat moved into the white house.

      I know that simple partisan hypocrisy doesn't let you class your opponents as fundamentally evil, but reality doesn't much give a shit.

      1. Ray Butlers   16 years ago

        Nothing evil about racist signs. Got it.

        1. Brian R   16 years ago

          There's something wrong with them. Of course there are very, very few of them. In my personal experience of two tea parties, there have been none. And I have the photos to prove it. In general there have been very few, it's just that those few get a lot of attention.

          But don't let that stop you from stereotyping all who disagree with you, and judging them on that basis. Nothing wrong with prejudice at all.

          1. seguin   16 years ago

            Ray Butler needs no proof. Ray Butler needs no critical thinking skills.

            Ray Butler is the Law.

            1. Judge Dredd   16 years ago

              LAWWWWWWWW!!!!!

  10. Alice   16 years ago

    So much unrealized potencial in this one, race was not even mentioned.

    1. SugarFree   16 years ago

      In the coastal dialect, my experience is that "redneck" is synonymous with "racist." I.e. racism is a necessary condition in order for one to be called a redneck.

      1. Astropud   16 years ago

        It must be regional. For some 'redneck' is merely a term for rural working white person. Red from the sun beating down on the back of their neck all day. For others, it's a racist insult. Have you ever heard of anyone who wasn't white called a redneck? Often, a person that says you should not use a word that is deemed to be racist is perfectly happy to do exactly that when it come to 'rednecks'. I liken it to the word 'nigger' (or 'wetback') which I believe can be a racist insult or not depending on context, who is saying it, and who it's being said about. Things like this make for all sorts of interesting conversations.

        1. cynical   16 years ago

          "Have you ever heard of anyone who wasn't white called a redneck?"

          I've heard of nonwhites being called "redskin" -- and presumably that includes the skin of the neck.

        2. Banjos Kick Ass!   16 years ago

          Don't forget the brand new derogatory term "teabagger".

  11. Botox Porcupine   16 years ago

    Horrible. D

    1. C Harm   16 years ago

      I thought it was a roseacea ad

      1. Groovus Maximus   16 years ago

        Ditto.

  12. sage   16 years ago

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

  13. B   16 years ago

    As though having money precludes one from being a redneck...

  14. Xmas   16 years ago

    So...I'm trying to start a trend of calling anyone that uses the term "Teabagger" a "felcher". Who's with me?

    1. James Ard   16 years ago

      I've been calling them teabaggies.

      1. Astropud   16 years ago

        You don't mean 'teabaggees', as in the recipients of a teabagging?

    2. Rethuglican Jesus   16 years ago

      I'm going with pig-fucker myself.

    3. cynical   16 years ago

      Call them Mr. Bucket (it's #11).

    4. Jimmy 'Crack' Corn   16 years ago

      Antiteabagers = felcher? Sounds right to me.
      Keith 'the felcher' Olbermann. Yep, sounds perfect.

    5. seguin   16 years ago

      I use Obamatons or the Olbermenschen

    6. Thorbie   16 years ago

      I call them Douchebaggers.

  15. FOXNEWS   16 years ago

    Is this a shot a Bill O'Rielly? If it is, Barry Goldberg is going to eat your lunch on-air.

  16. Warren   16 years ago

    Wake me if something interesting develops with the bags in the tea party.

    This week's Friday Funnies is a submission to Highlights "How many mistakes can you find".
    1) Missing I
    2) Another Missing I
    3) Tea party defender reading NYT
    4) Tea party critic not playing the race card
    5) Wall and ceiling disappear
    6) Beady eyes and pointy nose / cro-magnon forehead and Jewish nose

    1. .   16 years ago

      And real people don't even look like that!

      1. Jimmy 'Crack' Corn   16 years ago

        +10

    2. Tulpa   16 years ago

      Also the NYT has a horizontal fold, not a vertical one.

      Clearly the artist spends so much time developing the plot and dialogue of his work that the visual presentation is given short shrift.

    3. generic Brand   16 years ago

      Goofus votes along party lines every time, because he wants to beat back the evil party of NO.

      Gallant researches the issues, and chooses the candidate he feels has America's best interests in mind.

      Also, zaaaaany jokes on Page 7. This month's Highlights!

      1. PeeDub   16 years ago

        Don't miss:

        Aloysius runs for Congress!

  17. Kari's soiled panties   16 years ago

    The myth about Friday Funnies being funny was busted a long time ago.

    1. Sir Groovus Maximus   16 years ago

      What about yours?

  18. dee harley   16 years ago

    I know it's fun to think Tea Baggers are educated well-earning people. And some undoubtedly are. But the truth is that moat of them are dumb backward cretin ignoramuses who at best are laughable. Read Ron Rosenbaum's column in Slate.

    And I thought this magazine was called Reason for a reason.

    Cheers!

    1. bigbigslacker   16 years ago

      People who believe in the Constitution are cretins now. At least BHO isn't one.

      I would think the people who want something for nothing, at the expense of their fellow man, would be the cretins. What a funny world it is.

      1. .   16 years ago

        You're confusing lepers with parasites.

        1. .   16 years ago

          And cretins. Whatever.

        2. ogoggilby   16 years ago

          I always thought there was something leperous about parasites.

      2. dee harley   16 years ago

        Yes, you would think that, but you'd be wrong. Again.

        What does "believing" in the Constitution have to do with anything? Everyone believes in the Constitution.

        It doesn't take cretins like the Tea Baggers to understand the Constitution and what it means to this country.

        I didn't vote for Obama. Nor will I in 2012. But to liken him to Hitler is, as Rosenbaum writes in his Slate column, beyond ignorant, it's offensive to those who actually lived and died under his regime.

        Either the Tea Baggers are ignorant of this or they simply don't care.

        Regardless, they shall remain cretinous laughable buffoons until they get their facts (and philosophy) straight.

        I'm mean, at least pretend to be semi-evolved, eh?

        1. Untermensch   16 years ago

          Just out of curiosity, do you say the same thing to those who likened Bush to Hitler? Like it or not, comparing your enemies to Hitler is a staple for everyone in the political arena. To pretend otherwise and get your panties in a wad is to remain a cretinous, laughable buffoon.

          1. Steff   16 years ago

            My guess would be: No.

        2. Predicador   16 years ago

          But to liken him to Hitler is, as Rosenbaum writes in his Slate column, beyond ignorant, it's offensive to those who actually lived and died under his regime.

          as if you (and Rosenbaum) know better. so far haven't noticed anyone born before 1945 complaining about being offended.

          I lived in the Soviet Union from 1971 to 1991, and I'm absolutely not offended by the word 'Obamunism'. actually, I think it's pretty well deserved.

          p.s. in the USSR, there also was only one 'straight philosophy'.

          1. dee harley   16 years ago

            I'm not offended by the word 'Obamunism' either. That's not what I said. You must be a Tea Bagger. Poor thing. I'll type slower for you: Likening Obama, George W. Bush or my neighbor to Hitler is, again, beyond stupid, it trivializes the whole notion of what tyranny really is.

            Listen, people are free to be as ignorant as they want. But don't start comparing a health care bill to, oooh, the USSR. Grow up. Think for yourself.

            Toodeloo!

            1. dee harley, circa 2017   16 years ago

              I'm not offended by the word 'Obamunism' either. That's not what I said. You must be a Tea Bagger. Poor thing. I'll type slower for you: likening The Supreme Eternal God-Emperor Obama (PBUH) to Hitler is, again, beyond stupid, it trivializes the whole notion of what tyranny really is.

              Listen, people are free to be as ignorant as they want. But don't start comparing a bill to nationalize all land and industry and establish a set of bureaus to manage all capital for the glory of the people's Party and the God-Emperor to, oooh, the USSR. Grow up. Think for yourself.

              Toodeloo!

              [This message has been analyzed and validated by the Ministry of Truth.]

              1. dee harley   16 years ago

                You forgot to include The Supremely Stupid But Adorable Stooge-King W. (DUH).

                1. Jimmy 'Crack' Corn   16 years ago

                  Let me guess dee, you feel at least slightly better than most other people.

                  Yeah, that's what I thought.

            2. Thorbie   16 years ago

              Actually, typing slower doesn't make him stupid, it just makes you stupid.

        3. Metazoan   16 years ago

          We're all technically equally "evolved"

    2. Rethuglican Jesus   16 years ago

      And I thought this magazine was called Reason for a reason.

      Drink!!

      Cheers

    3. Joshua Lyle   16 years ago

      So what? It's also the case that "moat" of the general population are dumb backward cretin ignoramuses. They're just also less educated and have lower incomes than the median Tea-Partier.

      1. dee harley   16 years ago

        At least my misspelling was a typo, unlike the "above average" Tea Baggers who want to put an end to "Fasism" and like to call Obama a "Neggar."

        How adorable.

        1. Joshua Lyle   16 years ago

          I'll concede to being adorable so long as you construe by silence that I'm correct.

          1. dee harley   16 years ago

            OK, I'll construe by silence that you're correct. Whatever that means. You win. Yay! Now let's kick that Fasist Socalist Nazi Neggar out of office! Whose with me?

            1. cynical   16 years ago

              I'm only with you if we kick the white half of the president out of office too. Wouldn't want to be racist, after all.

    4. Brian R   16 years ago

      "moat of them are dumb backward cretin ignoramuses who at best are laughable. " [citation needed]

      Especially since the actual data contradict you.
      http://www.gallup.com/poll/127.....phics.aspx

      Fun excerpts from the link:
      "Tea Party supporters are slightly more likely to be male and less likely to be lower-income. ...
      In several other respects, however -- their age, educational background, employment status, and race -- Tea Partiers are quite representative of the public at large."

      Please, keep demonstrating your superior reason.

      1. dee harley   16 years ago

        Wow, a poll. Guess I lost that argument.

        1. Brian R   16 years ago

          At least you're enough of a grownup to admit it. A sad proportion of people cling to comforting, but unfounded, notions even in the face of conflicting data. It's nice to run into someone rational for a change.

          1. Jimmy 'Crack' Corn   16 years ago

            That's why he reads Reason!

            Har dee har

    5. Grammar Nazi   16 years ago

      Most, not moat. Ignorami. Never begin a sentence with a conjuction. Ron Rosenbaum is a hack.

      That is all.

  19. TP   16 years ago

    A question that will plague mankind for the next century.

    Just exactly who are the Tea Partiers?

    1. Suriously   16 years ago

      Ashamed Republicans.

    2. Fat Steve   16 years ago

      Cunts.

  20. matt   16 years ago

    Shame on Chip. Did he write this for Fox News? Don't forget this same poll showed really big percentages think Obama is a muslim and not an American.

    1. Jimmy 'Crack' Corn   16 years ago

      That would be big percentages "of the public at large" that thinks he is a muslim.
      Those ignorant, racist progressives...

  21. Henry   16 years ago

    You people seriously leave THE WORST comments. COMMENT ON THE CARTOON. YOU ARE NOT A STAND UP COMEDIAN. AND IF YOU WANT TO SAY HELLO AND GOOD MORNING TO PEOPLE GO ON AIM.

    1. St. V   16 years ago

      I do NOT wish you a good morning, you scrooge.

  22. Momus   16 years ago

    Redneck...a term originally assigned to pro-union W.Va miners...typically democrats, because of the red bandanas they had around their neck. And some of the miners were black (ethnically).

    It's amusing to then hear the uninformed idiots like Garafalo now attempt to combine the term "redneck" and "racism" in yet another display of implied revisionist history.

  23. Scarpe Nike   14 years ago

    is good

  24. sd   14 years ago

    sd

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Americans Need More and Better 'Third Places.' User Fees Can Help.

C. Jarrett Dieterle and Shawn Regan | 12.13.2025 7:00 AM

Nepal's Socialist Government Banned Social Media, So Activists Plotted a Revolution—on Discord.

Matthew Petti | From the January 2026 issue

The Feds' 'Worst of the Worst' Database Is Stuffed with Nonviolent Offenders. Who Exactly Is ICE Arresting?

Autumn Billings | 12.12.2025 6:00 PM

Donald Trump Tries To Override State AI Regulations via Executive Order

Jack Nicastro | 12.12.2025 5:38 PM

2 Grand Juries Have Rejected the Grudge-Driven Case Against Trump Foe Letitia James

Jacob Sullum | 12.12.2025 4:00 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks