Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

David Brooks, on Obama and the Deficit: "If he had some support, he'd do the right thing"

Matt Welch | 4.2.2010 11:44 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Plenty more howlers at the link.

More on the NYT con's presidential enthusiasms here, here, and (especially) at The New Republic.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Tea Partiers Wonder: What's In It For Me?

Matt Welch is an editor at large at Reason.

PoliticsCultureGovernment SpendingBarack ObamaPrint Media
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (29)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Jock Strap   15 years ago

    If he had some support, he'd do the right thing.

    I'll lend him some, if Brooks isn't putting me on.

    1. Prolefeed   15 years ago

      Matt -- please quit calling this fucker a conservative. That, or provide some evidence that he actually is one.

      1. alan   15 years ago

        On The NewsHour he represents the conservative in the traditional MSM dichotomy of liberal/conservative to the liberal Mark Shields. The NewsHour is a government organization so he is officially certified as a conservative. Who ever officially authorized William Buckley? Oh, wait, the CIA. Never mind, he had the government stamp of approval, too. Especially when he wrote in the early fifties that the Right needs to accept central planning of the economy if we have any chance of competing with the Communist menace. So, actually, whether we like it or not, Brooks doesn't stretch any bounds of that tradition (probably has something to do with why Hayek insisted he wasn't a conservative) in spite of the fact he is barely distinguishable from your typical love struck Obamanick.

        1. alan   15 years ago

          BTW, what was the name of the magazine that was later to be found to be backed by CIA funding to affect political opinion? Ramparts, was it? I recall finding a stack of them in my old school's library and reading through some issues. Actually, it was pretty good stuff for propaganda.

        2. Tulpa   15 years ago

          The NewsHour is not a government organization. It is produced by a TV station that receives a small part of its operating government from the feds, some from its state govt, but most from private foundations and corporations, and individual donors.

          And to be honest, the anti-Obama POV gets a lot fairer representation on PBS news shows than it does on any of the fully-private networks other than FoxNews.

          1. alan   15 years ago

            It is produced by a TV station that receives a small part of its operating government from the feds, some from its state govt, but most from private foundations and corporations, and individual donors.

            I was very well of all of those facts before I breached this controversial subject matter. If you notice the term 'government organization' still fits the definition (government based, government backed), and that is why I used vague wording instead of more precise usage because it is my M.O. to avoid pedantic correction in the first place. Christ, give me some fucking credit.

            And to be honest, the anti-Obama POV gets a lot fairer representation on PBS news shows than it does on any of the fully-private networks other than FoxNews.

            CNN must really stink to high heaven at this point in time, as I've noticed a bias trend of late. I suspect an increase in Judy's pull in the production process is the likely culprit. I always think of a Don Henly tune when I see her read news of the left's political successes like there is a 'gleam in her eye', and old blue haired Al is going to get some later in the evening.

            I'll stick around for the news reporting but avoid those round table discussions or Judy or Glen doing one on ones.

            1. The Other Pedant   15 years ago

              Al Hunt's hair is not really blue. The blue that most senior citizens are accused of having is actually a silvery sheen caused by lighter hair scattering light before they reach thicker hair. Hunt's hair has very little sheen and is pretty much a solid mass of white.

  2. Jordan Elliot   15 years ago

    "God put you on this earth to manipulate voters for the good of the country.

    What. The. Fuck...!?

    That whole article reads kind of like the ravings of a madman.

  3. ?   15 years ago

    President Obama was smart

    Gay.

  4. Jeffersonian   15 years ago

    You know, maybe what Brooks says is true, that Obama would take on profligate spending if he got some backing. But to suggest that Obama has "fought against powerful political pressure for a series of mechanisms, which, though riven with loopholes, at least have the potential to control spending..." is such utter and complete bullshit that it defies reality. I had to go drop a rook from a chess set just to see if gravity was still working after reading that.

    Brooks has gone bonkers.

  5. P Brooks   15 years ago

    If pigs had wings, they'd be eagles.

    1. FLAPPY THE EAGLE   15 years ago

      EAGLES THAT WOULD EAT YOUR LIVERS!

      1. Captain Holly   15 years ago

        Flappy, you know that eagles are already quite capable of eating human livers, if they can keep the human down long enough.

        Sadly, the inevitable effect of crossing pigs with eagles would create a large bird that tastes like bacon -- thus ensuring its extinction.

        1. Conan, The Barbarian   15 years ago

          Tell me about it! Though they usually go for the soft materials, eyes lips, cocks, and such before they delve into the sinewy muscles under your flesh to get to the organs.

          1. Prometheus   15 years ago

            Don't be such a pussy. Hell, I endured centuries of having my liver ripped out while chained to a crag. Just for giving man the gift of fire.

            Ingrates.

            1. Thoth's severed Head   15 years ago

              When you can punish as much as you have been punished then you can call Conan a pussy.

  6. P Brooks   15 years ago

    If your aunt had balls, she wouldn't sit like that.

  7. sage   15 years ago

    Obama hasn't been recklessly brave on this issue, but he's fought against powerful political pressure for a series of mechanisms, which, though riven with loopholes, at least have the potential to control spending

    So does self control. HEY! BILLY MAYS SPEAKING FROM THE GRAVE HERE! TALKING ABOUT THE NOT-SO-NEW AND NOT-NEEDING-TO-BE-IMPROVED SELF CONTROL! IT COSTS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING, IN FACT IT WILL SAVE!! YOU!! MONEY!! AND IF YOU ACT NOW, YOU MAY EVEN SAVE YOUR DEAR REPUBLIC. HURRY, BEFORE IT'S GONE!

  8. anomdebus   15 years ago

    Before you mutilate your David Brooks voodoo dolls irreparably, note the publish date and hope he has a sense of humor.

    1. Jordan Elliot   15 years ago

      Good call.

    2. Groovus Maximus   15 years ago

      Too late. I truly despise that douchebag.

    3. Tulpa   15 years ago

      Umm, no. David Brooks is A Fool For All Seasons.

  9. P Brooks   15 years ago

    hope he has a sense of humor.

    Fantasist.

  10. triangleman   15 years ago

    I usually go to the bondage-themed strip club for the buffet.

  11. Jersey Patriot   15 years ago

    Isn't this the idiot who keeps lamenting the death of statemanship?

  12. Mike M.   15 years ago

    I agree with the general sentiment; Brooks may be starting to lose his mind.

    If somebody doesn't hold an intervention or something, he might start writing about Trig Palin before too long.

  13. Prolefeed   15 years ago

    It seems too non-over-the-top, non-Onionish to be an April Fools prank.

    This asshat actually seems to believe this rubbish.

  14. Douglas Fletcher   15 years ago

    I think Brooks is still mesmerized by that crease in Obama's pants.

    1. Yonemoto   15 years ago

      fap fap fap fap fap

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How the NCAA Helped Trump Score Big on Transgender Issues

Billy Binion | 7.2.2025 5:34 PM

Under the 'Big, Beautiful Bill,' Car Companies Won't Be Fined for Failing To Hit Arbitrary Fuel Efficiency Goals

Joe Lancaster | 7.2.2025 5:15 PM

The 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Keeps Most of Joe Biden's Energy Subsidies

Jeff Luse | 7.2.2025 4:44 PM

Florida Plans To Deputize 9 National Guardsmen as Immigration Judges To Increase Deportations

Autumn Billings | 7.2.2025 4:08 PM

The Tax Bill Rewards States for Higher Rates of Food Stamp Fraud

Eric Boehm | 7.2.2025 3:25 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!