Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Don't Pay Your Taxes, Don't Get Paid in Tax Dollars. Simple.

Katherine Mangu-Ward | 3.11.2010 12:31 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

I love a nice political stunt.

Just in time for tax season, California Senate candidate Carly Fiorina (and former HP exec) is backing legislation that would set up new rules to give the heave ho to any federal employee who hasn't paid their taxes. The bill was proposed by Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah)—who goes by the hilarious Twitter name jasoninthehouse—and it stipulates that "persons having seriously delinquent tax debts shall be ineligible for Federal employment."

From Fiorina's press release:

The measure would extend to all federal government employees an existing Internal Revenue Service (IRS) policy that allows the agency to terminate its own employees who do not pay their income taxes. According to the IRS, 447 House employees and 231 Senate workers failed to pay federal income taxes in 2008. House staff owed $5.8 million in unpaid taxes, and Senate staff owed $2.46 million in unpaid taxes last year. The IRS also reports that 276,000 federal civilian employees owed $962 million in unpaid federal income taxes in 2008.

Remember when a passel of Obama appointees didn't pay their taxes either, but then a bunch of them got to hold really important jobs anyway? Good times.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Ten Years of Union "Ugly" in California

Katherine Mangu-Ward is editor in chief of Reason.

PoliticsGovernment ReformCalifornia
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (44)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. LibertyBill   15 years ago

    Isnt Fiorina considered the Libertarian in this race?

    1. John Thacker   15 years ago

      I think that Tom Campbell is considered that.

    2. El Capitano   15 years ago

      Carly Fiorina is considered the idiot in this race. See: Demon Sheep.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yo7HiQRM7BA

      Campbell's the libertarian in this race.

      1. l0phty   15 years ago

        Nancy Peolosi is considered a libertarian in CA.

        1. Shelby   15 years ago

          No, but she is considered to be a serious person and a responsible politician, which is even more bizarre.

  2. Charlie R.   15 years ago

    Paying taxes is for suckas!!

    1. Don H.   15 years ago

      Every year on the fourth of July I look at how much tax debt I have and estimate how much I need to pay the rest of the year. I aim for just above a zero return. I have had to pay taxes one year because of unforeseen changes. Having to tap the HELOC was not my first choice but the best at the time.

  3. Tim G.   15 years ago

    Damn Straight!

  4. R C Dean   15 years ago

    it stipulates that "persons having seriously delinquent tax debts shall be ineligible for Federal employment."

    Prediction: No amount of tax debt will be found to be seriously delinquent, and so no one will be fired.

    Why the fuck do they have to use this kind of weasel wording? Why can't they just give a hard, bright-line test:

    Any federal employee who has not paid his or her taxes in full within six months of the due date will be terminated immediately and will not be eligible for re-hire for five years.

    Employees who are more than six months late, but whose tax liability has not been finally determined by the exhaustion of all appeals, shall be suspended at half pay. In the event that it is determined on appeal that they owed no taxes, they shall be reinstated and any wages withheld shall be paid in full.

    1. fresno dan   15 years ago

      Well, taking the number of senators and congressman, determining 90%, than adding the rest of them, which equates to the number who have knowingly evaded taxes, and/or unknowingly, which mops up everybody else...yup, theres your problem...or feature. You would never have a quorum.
      Have you paid all your taxes? If you believe that, you have never talked to an IRS auditor.

      1. Tapeworm   15 years ago

        I have? If not, then there is something seriously wrong with the 2009 1040EZ form and my 2009 W-2.

    2. LibertyBill   15 years ago

      How is it that us petty citizens can come up with a better plan than our so called leaders?

    3. Episiarch   15 years ago

      They can't do that, RC. Because they always have to put escape clauses in...for themselves.

    4. x,y   15 years ago

      And note that "seriously delinquent" refers to the amount of time the debt has been outstanding, not the amount of the debt. Unless of course you read it so that "seriously" modifies both "delinquent" and "tax debts," which I don't.

    5. John Thacker   15 years ago

      In the event that it is determined on appeal that they owed no taxes, they shall be reinstated and any wages withheld shall be paid in full.

      Awesome, so if the IRS investigates and you're found cleared, free vacation.

      Await the government employees who manipulate the system to get audited on purpose.

    6. Captain Holly   15 years ago

      Spot on, RC.

      But you know as well as I do if it didn't contain weasel wording the bill wouldn't get a single co-sponsor.

    7. BS   15 years ago

      R C Dean for President

  5. R C Dean   15 years ago

    Oh, and one more:

    Any employee who accepts half pay while litigating their appeal shall be required to repay wages received while on suspension in the event it is determined on appeal that they owed taxes.

  6. Big B   15 years ago

    I think you need something for a payment plan. "Paid in full" would have you firing anyone on a plan, but that's a pretty easy fix, I would think.

    1. R C Dean   15 years ago

      I think you need something for a payment plan.

      Why? Pay your fucking taxes on time, or get of the taxpayer tit.

  7. x,y   15 years ago

    RC, you forgot "ineligible." If I were defending one of these tax-feeding buttclowns I would argue the rule only applies to prospective employees, not current. I'm not saying it would work, but it's not Rule 11 sanctionable to make that argument.

  8. P Brooks   15 years ago

    I have to ask: are these people "tax cheats" or are they merely unable (like most Americans) to decipher the fucking morass of idiotic and impenetrable tax rules?

    Of course, the fact that they are actually in a position to effectively advocate for tax simplification, and do not, is all the more reason to despise them.

    1. R C Dean   15 years ago

      I have to ask: are these people "tax cheats" or are they merely unable (like most Americans) to decipher the fucking morass of idiotic and impenetrable tax rules?

      The IRS doesn't care, and neither do I.

      Unless the people most able to affect our tax code lie broken and bleeding in the street until its fixed, it won't get fixed.

    2. zeroentitlement   15 years ago

      like most Americans

      I get such a kick out of this myth, whenever I see it. "Ohh, taxes are sooooo haaaaarrrrd!" No, actually, most Americans can do basic arithmetic if they're willing to take their attention away from their TVs and cell phones for five minutes together.

      Of course, if government employees find their taxes too complex, they could always simplify them and institute a flat tax. "Ohhh, but that's soooo haaaaarrrrd!" Yeah. Well, enjoy unemployment then, AFAIC.

      1. l0phty   15 years ago

        Don't forget, Federal Employee taxes are soooo complicated due to stock options, offshore tax shelters, wind turbine farms, etc. No federal employee should be expected to complete their tax return - it's just too difficult.

  9. smartass sob   15 years ago

    "persons having seriously delinquent tax debts shall be ineligible for Federal employment."

    What? You mean the Feds won't let them work it off?

    1. l0phty   15 years ago

      LOL. You said "work".

      1. Captain Holly   15 years ago

        You said "Feds" and "work" in the same sentence.

        EPIC LULZ!!

  10. SugarFree   15 years ago

    Why do they pay income taxes at all? Lower their pay by a commensurate amount and the money doesn't have to go through another IRS/Budgeting spin cycle. Why waste even more money than we already are?

    1. CrackertyAssCracker   15 years ago

      that would make it more obvious that they are actually parasites. Can't have that.

      1. SugarFree   15 years ago

        So would making them wear pubic lice costumes to work... hmm...

  11. Patrick   15 years ago

    Yet another instance where our glorious leaders won't be beholden to the same behavior.

  12. Troy   15 years ago

    Apparently there is nothing in the proposed law that would stop me from heading the Department of Treasury.

  13. Charles Rangel   15 years ago

    This is racist.

  14. Steve Chaos   15 years ago

    I predict hilarious unintended consequences.

  15. BS   15 years ago

    R C Dean for President

  16. Anthony   15 years ago

    Demon Sheep are not libertarian

  17. Paul   15 years ago

    Why should our Overlords pay any tax? We are lucky to have them guide us to a bright and shining future!!!! I'm mean, what? Is Kim Il-Jung going to dive into this mess? No! So, lets support our leaders.

    Thank you

    Paul

  18. bandit   15 years ago

    I believe these laws would be ruled unconstitutional.

  19. TRO   15 years ago

    Federal employee here and I pay my taxes on time, every time. Frankly I'm amazed that so many federal employees don't pay their taxes. I guess I just assumed it would be something the IRS would check out and deal with easily since they can garnish wages for a ton of other things pretty easily.

  20. Dyspeptic Curmudgeon   15 years ago

    What do you call it when 276,000 simple serpents get fired for failing to comply with federal laws?

    A GOOD START!

  21. Conservative Lawyer   15 years ago

    Well, the delinquent thing will work, but you can't suspend them at half pay or take any negative action so long as they are legitimately fighting with the IRS, as opposed to being in default. That would pretty clearly violate due process, and not the liberal "due process is whatever I want it to be" but actual, real due process.

    You have a right to fight and appeal IRS attempts to take your hard-earned money, and nobody-even federal government employees-should be punished for exercising their rights to challenge the IRS.

  22. Bjh   15 years ago

    I'd like to point out that each gov't agency has it's own rules, and many have "bright lines" . For example, for some elements at DOJ, you will lose your job if you don't pay your taxes. Further, for positions that require a clearance and what's called a "lifestyle" polygraph, they ask you specifically if you've cheated on your taxes ( also if you steal, cheat or lie in general, seriously)and if you have, you lose your clearance and your job. I think a better idea would be that all our elected representatives must pass the same full scope polygraph that many federal employees have to pass. It is a little demoralizing when the people "above" you are subject to lower standards of personal behavior than you are. Plus it would have the added benefit of completely cleaning house, and we could start over again.

  23. Roger Godby   15 years ago

    Man, that tax-free income job in the UAE and Form 2555 Foreign Earned Income Exclusion keep sounding better by the day. Or I could just get hired by the Big O and save on travel expenses.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Review: There Are No Top-Down Solutions to the Problems Depicted in Adolescence

Autumn Billings | From the July 2025 issue

Review: A Comic Book Villain Runs for Mayor of New York in the New Daredevil Series

Joe Lancaster | From the July 2025 issue

Brickbat: Friends in High Places

Charles Oliver | 6.6.2025 4:00 AM

Is the Supreme Court Really That Divided? The Facts Say No.

Billy Binion | 6.5.2025 5:21 PM

Milton Friedman Disproved Trump's Argument for Tariffs Decades Ago

Joe Lancaster | 6.5.2025 4:35 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!