'Why Fill Out the Forms?'
The New York Times reports that strict rules imposed by the New Direction Congress® and a president who vowed to "change the way business is done in Washington" have already reduced the number of D.C.-based lobbyists—by encouraging them to stop calling themselves lobbyists:
The law required lobbyists to report four times a year instead of two, and to detail any campaign contributions and certain meetings with public officials. The law also made it a crime for registered lobbyists to provide gifts or meals to lawmakers or their aides….
"All the increasing restrictions on lobbyists are a disincentive to be a lobbyist, and those who think they can deregister are eagerly doing so," said Jan Baran, a veteran political lawyer who has been fielding questions from clients hoping to escape registration….
But for all its penalties, the law left the definition of a lobbyist fairly elastic. The criteria included getting paid to lobby, contacting public officials about a client's interests at least twice in a quarter and working at least 20 percent of the time on lobbying-related activities for the client.
Enforcement is also light. Lobbyists suspected of failing to file receive at least one official letter offering a chance to rectify their status before any legal action is taken.
After the rules changed, private companies and nonprofit groups immediately began to rethink their registration.
The rethinkers include Ellen Miller, co-founder of the Sunlight Foundation, a big booster of transparency in government (and lobbying):
"I have never spent much time on Capitol Hill," Ms. Miller said, explaining that she only supervises those who press lawmakers directly. "I am not lobbying, so why fill out the forms?"
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I am no lobbyist - I am a therapeutic consultant.
And a columnist for The New York Post.
Oooh
hey, that can be talken as very strict enforcement, since if you get a papercut from that letter and gets infected, you could end up paying thousands in hospital bills. That's bad-ass in Lobbyist land.
I believe anyone who cared to fish around would find that certain commenters (ahem) predicted exactly this. And even got into an argument with a certain other dearly departed commenter about how easy and prevalent it would be.
Joe - god I miss that little rascal
There's nothing wrong with national bobbyists!
When lobbying is outlawed, only outlaws will lobby.
I think only patricians should be allowed to lobby. Plebs are so, you know, vulgar.
There is also the transparency rules on communications with registered lobbyists about the recovery act. The administration pretty much banned executive officials from speaking with registered lobbyists about recovery act projects. No such restrictions on every one else. The easy solution is to not be a registered lobbyist.
The cash must flow!
Muad'Dib: Spice Trade "Consultant"