Do You Know What I Idi Amin, Amin
About a decade ago, I picked up a copy of John Follain's wonderfully entertaining potboiler Jackal: The Complete Story of the Legendary Terrorist, Carlos the Jackal, a precise catalog of the brutal murders and pointless "commando operations" masterminded by the former Venezuelan revolutionary. Even by the standards of 1970s terror groups—think the PFLP, Red Brigades, RAF—Carlos's brutality stood out. But as he withers away in a French prison, having predictably transformed himself into a warrior for Allah, he will be happy to discover that he still has fans in the land of his birth:
Hugo Chavez has defended the alleged terrorist mastermind Carlos the Jackal, saying the Venezuelan imprisoned in France was an important "revolutionary fighter" who supported the cause of the Palestinians….Ramirez gained international notoriety during the 1970s and 80s as the alleged mastermind of a series of bombings, killings and hostage dramas. He is serving a life sentence in France for the 1975 murders of two French secret agents and an alleged informant.
"They accuse him of being a terrorist, but Carlos really was a revolutionary fighter," Chavez said during a televised speech to socialist politicians from various countries, who applauded.
In his speech, Chavez also sought to defend other leaders he said are wrongly labeled "bad guys" internationally, including Zimbabwe's Robert Mugabe and Iran's Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Chavez called both of them brothers and said he now wonders whether Ugandan dictator Idi Amin was truly as brutal as he was reputed to be.
If Carlos isn't exactly to your taste, how about a different lunatic anti-Semite that terrorized people?
"We thought he was a cannibal," the Venezuelan leader said, referring to [Ugandan dictator Idi] Amin, whose regime was notorious for torturing and killing suspected opponents in the 1970s. "I have doubts. … I don't know, maybe he was a great nationalist, a patriot."
A fairly large quibble with the Associated Press writer Ian James, who writes that Chavez "defended the alleged terrorist" Carlos the Jackal. Alleged? At what point does a man convicted of three murders, who has been forthcoming about his involvement in terrorism ("When he was in front of me, I shot him between the eyes. When he hit the ground, I shot him in the left temple."), who released a book from prison praising Osama bin Laden and defending terror as an "anti-imperialist" tactic, qualify as an actual terrorist? And why isn't Amin the alleged dictator of Uganda?
Lefty blogger and expert-in-everything Matt Yglesias provides us with the dumbest argument of the day, writing that having been defanged by the brilliant Obama administration (!) "seems to have left Chavez a bit adrift and looking to push the envelope. How else to explain the idea of praising Idi Amin in a speech."
Yes, the normally sedate and statesman-like Chavez, who in those dark pre-Obama years praised Robert Mugabe, Mahmoud Ahmedinejad, Chairman Mao, Bashar Assad, Saddam Hussein, Fidel Castro, Carlos the Jackal (this wasn't the first time), Daniel Ortega, the FARC, Hezbollah, and Muammar Gaddafi, was pushed into a corner by Washington and is most likely acting out by saying outrageous things he couldn't possibly believe.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Lefty blogger and expert-in-everything Matt Yglesias provides us with the dumbest argument of the day[...]
You're being redundant.
Yglesias is left wondering:
That's really not the kind of statement that bolsters one's confidence in the man's commitment to liberalism and democracy.
The fact that he's astounded by Chavez's statement conveys a pretty clear picture of the Left's delusional tendencies.
joe from Lowell Says:
November 23rd, 2009 at 9:48 am
It's odd to see the desperate-plea-for-attention behavior one usually associates with middle school students being displayed by the President of Venezuela.
What's next, writing pentagrams on his forearm in ballpoint pen?
trust democracy joe.
...Who cares?
Seriously, who cares?
I care about Chavez' actions, to the extent that they have harmed the Venezuelan people and stolen their freedom and property. But Chavez' statements really concern me not at all.
He could give a speech a day consisting of nothing more than accusations that I, personally, fuck goats - and I wouldn't care. That means that I care about his opinion of Osama bin Laden and Carlos the Jackal even less.
I never personally fuck goats, I always hire an agent to do so.
The goats were not unresponsive
...Who cares?
Seriously, who cares?
I care about Chavez' actions, to the extent that they have harmed the Venezuelan people and stolen their freedom and property. But Chavez' statements really concern me not at all.
He could give a speech a day consisting of nothing more than accusations that I, personally, fuck goats - and I wouldn't care. That means that I care about his opinion of Osama bin Laden and Carlos the Jackal even less.
Sorry about the double post.
Does Matthew Yglesias give serious consideration to his own arguments? Or do you continue posting his comments for the lulz?
Lulz are always good, imo.
Well, there is one reason to care about Chavez' saying these things: he has at his command the violent coercive apparatus of a modern nation-state. The fact that he admires murderers does not bode well for the people of Venezuela.
Ylesias thinks history started when George W. Bush became President. So I'm not surprised about his "world knowledge" or lack thereof.
It's odd to see the desperate-plea-for-attention behavior one usually associates with middle school students being displayed by the President of Venezuela.
...unless you have heard of this Hugo Chavez fellow before, joe, you gimp.
10/17/08 NEVER FORGET
Refresh my memory - what happened on 10/17/08? Or should I be afraid to ask?
If you remember Joe, ask. If not, don't bother.
Old Mex--See here: http://reason.com/blog/2009/11.....nt_1457495
"Out of here."
Oh, right...
Thanks.
Ah, ok. Thank you for the link. NOW I see.
I think Mugabe is much worse than Idi Amin. Uganda has always been a craphole. It takes a real moron to turn one of the more prosperous African colonies into the disaster it is now.
But Chavez' statements really concern me not at all.
Sure.
But the fact that our lefty friends, with their deep commitments to liberalism and democracy and such, have long widely praised and weirdly idolized, in near total ignorance of his "actions," a rhetorical nationalist socialist dictator, with all the rhetorical characteristics you'd expect from one, is probably something we should note.
For reference.
Maybe we can enlist the Jackal to help us secure donations for the Treasury.
Oh, joe. Never stop being you.
Idi, Idi, Idi Amin
Most amazing man there's ever been
He' the General, the President, the King of sea
Idi, Idi, Idi Amin
You should really be apologizing for the double goat-fucking
thanks