Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Friday Funnies

Obama's trip abroad

Chip Bok | 11.20.2009 7:00 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Stay Away from the Police

Chip Bok
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (92)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   15 years ago

    I get it.

  2. Kyle Jordan   15 years ago

    A

    (Fuck the spam filter)

    1. Suki   15 years ago

      +1 (for each line)

  3. Warty   15 years ago

    Holy shit, is this two good Friday Funnis in a row?

  4. JW   15 years ago

    Not bad.

    B+ (Fuck the spam & english filter)

  5. ed   15 years ago

    OK, that one made me laugh (out loud).
    Good thing I'm unemployed. People would be suspicious.

    1. SoFl   15 years ago

      Being un-employed is "good"?

  6. Rich   15 years ago

    Nice chronicling, Chip.

    Hey, how about another version with thought balloons for the leaders?

    1. SugarFree   15 years ago

      It'd just be the same one for all three: "SUCK IT"

  7. James Ard   15 years ago

    That one may be his best yet. But that isn't a very high bar.

  8. Uncle Miltie   15 years ago

    If you owe China $10 billion, China owns you.
    If you owe China $10 trillion, you own China.

    And in Soviet Russia, Yakov Smirnoff is still being raped by the KGB.

    1. R C Dean   15 years ago

      If you need China to finance another $10 trillion, then China owns you.

      1. Paul   15 years ago

        But once you get the $10 trillion...

        1. Uncle Miltie   15 years ago

          If you threaten to default on your previous debt, then the Chinamen will stand in line.

          Gentlemen, we've found a chink in China's armor!

  9. Ray Butlers   15 years ago

    You people are a bunch of idiots. Did Obama put us in the this situation? Answer: no.

    1. Uncle Miltie   15 years ago

      They still think Reagan was a fiscal conservative.

      Don't wake them up, they look so cute when they dream about that cowboy from Illinois.

    2. Nick   15 years ago

      Nah, he didn't start the fire, but he's trying to put it out with kerosene.

    3. eb   15 years ago

      i love the typical obamatron/ lefty defence of obama breaking the budget... "well bush started it"... this is about as juvinial as a brothe defending himself to him mom for hitting hid sister that "she did it first." Its as if Bush being a horrible president somehow excuses obama from being a horrible president.

      1. Uncle Miltie   15 years ago

        Your analogy is flawed.

        I'm not defending Obama, I'm merely suggesting that he's inherited a shitty situation that he's trying to resolve.

        I don't know if what he's doing is wrong or right and neither do you.

        1. Jim Treacher   15 years ago

          That's where you're wrong.

          1. Uncle Miltie   15 years ago

            You know about the secret Chinese plan to build a Voltron repo man?

            1. Jim Treacher   15 years ago

              Blahbitty blah blah?

        2. Hal   15 years ago

          Ignoramus much?

          1. Jim Treacher   15 years ago

            What a well-constructed sentence.

        3. John Galt   15 years ago

          No, we know that what he is doing is wrong.

          1. Uncle Miltie   15 years ago

            Obama's not the Messiah.
            He's a very naughty boy!

        4. Paul   15 years ago

          I don't know if what he's doing is wrong or right and neither do you.

          Yeah we do.

        5. William Walsh   15 years ago

          "I don't know if what he's doing is wrong or right and neither do you."

          Interesting because, you see, I do know he's wrong.

    4. Paul   15 years ago

      It's just that Obama is such a fanboy of Bush policies...

      1. Uncle Miltie   15 years ago

        Yeah, but he's still got 3 more years to start rolling back the Bush idiocies of yore.

        1. Sudden   15 years ago

          Yet instead he decided to go Bush on Roids by taking Bush policies and doing it fivefold. Considering that Obama is Bush x5, I'm surprised you Obamaphiles aren't proposing a statue of Bush be built with stimulus money.

          1. Uncle Miltie   15 years ago

            Well, we'll see if he's successful in the next election or not.

            The American voter is a fiscal liberal and a social conservative or a bizarro-libertarian, if you will.

            YES to free stuff!
            NO to gays getting married!

            1. Brown-Eyed Anarchist   15 years ago

              Please stop breaking my heart by pointing out reality. You are harshing my libertarian buzz. Actually Uncle, I do think that the current disconnect between "free stuff" and how the hell it is paid for is quickly disappearing amongst voters. But unfortunately, they still think that gay marriage will somehow make them gay, or whatever insane logic they use against gay marriage.

  10. Xeones   15 years ago

    I kind of chuckled, briefly, in my head. On the Friday Funnies curve, that's an A+.

    Our trolls, above, maintain their F average.

  11. SugarFree   15 years ago

    Xeones,

    They should get a curve too... it's hard to post when you're fucking each other while wearing Obama masks.

  12. FrBunny   15 years ago

    I like how in the last panel, despite being confronted with an IOU, Obama is content to shoot craps in an alley.

    That dude is a badass.

    1. Art-P.O.G.   15 years ago

      Ooh, you were trying to get a "Racist!" Say, do you think he's about to get a Mickey's Wide Mouth and a Jet magazine at his local convenience store, too, FrBunny? 😉

  13. Pro Libertate   15 years ago

    If I were Obama and had endured criticism for bowing to two world leaders, when I met the premier of China, I'd have kowtowed. Just to piss people off all the more.

    You know, China is like a billion times more dependent on us than we are on them. We, not they, have the power to make another country with cheap labor numero uno in production. India, Indonesia, etc. are all ready and willing. Our treasury issues with China are short term.

    1. Uncle Miltie   15 years ago

      There's a sucker born each minute, especially in China.
      If China's buying our debt, why not stroke their egos and bow to them?

      Bowing before King Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz of Saudi Arabia?

      $0.

      Bowing before President Hu Jintao of China?

      $0.

      Convincing the King of the Sand people and the President of the Opium smokers to buy our worthless debt in exchange for oil and cheap labor?

      Priceless.

      1. domoarrigato   15 years ago

        this might be the dumbest thing I've ever heard. like the Chinese are selling us goods in order to make a profit in treasury debt. they just want to stay in control of 25 percent of the planets population - that much power is worth far more than a few trillion, my friends.

        1. Uncle Miltie   15 years ago

          And we can tell the Chinese that we're defaulting on the debt and fuck you very much.

          1. Sudden   15 years ago

            And when we do that and the world sees that our creditworthiness is shot to shit, it'll be REAL easy to fund that lavish ponzi-state you're so enamored with, right? Oh that's right, we'll ju8st get helicopter Ben to sprinkle $100 bills across the inner cities like its hope dust.

            1. Uncle Miltie   15 years ago

              It's economically mutually assured self-destruction or econoMAD, if you will.

    2. R C Dean   15 years ago

      You know, China is like a billion times more dependent on us than we are on them.

      At this point, I'd say its about even, and the trend is in their favor.

      They are exiting the dollar trap. We have to, have to, issue trillions of debt over the next several years, which they don't have to buy.

      1. Uncle Miltie   15 years ago

        So we'll cut some military spending.
        Big deal.

        1. Paul   15 years ago

          Military spending is the only thing this country has ever historically made real cuts to from time to time. Everything else? Not so much.

          1. Uncle Miltie   15 years ago

            Say it loud and say it proud:
            Paul is queer for the military-industrial complex.

            1. Sudden   15 years ago

              We'll cut military spending? Are you aware that the lion's share of our public liabilities (some $65 trillion, more than the entire GDP of planet earth) is committed to entitlement spending. We could eliminate the military entirely, but it won't come anywhere close to the kind of savings necessary for SS and Medicare. Actuarial stuff can be a little boring and dry, but the devil is in the details.

              1. Uncle Miltie   15 years ago

                $515.4 billions in military expenditure
                An additional $900 billions on the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.
                An additional $651.2 billions in Dept. of Defense spending.
                FBI counter terrorism:$2.4 billions
                Dept. of State: $38.0 billions
                Dept. of Energy, nuclear weapons: $18.2 billions
                Veterans Affairs: $91.9 billions
                Homeland Security: $44.3 billions
                Military Pensions: $48.7 billions
                Interest on debt from previous wars: $59.5 billions

                So there's plenty to cut here.

      2. Laoshi   15 years ago

        I just got back from a month in China where my banker friend there encouraged me to transfer even more dollars into RMB. China is using dollars to buy up resources in Brazil and Indonesia, now does settlement with several SE Asian countries in RMB or local currency, and is very concerned about the pending collapse of the dollar with super inflation.
        The big international five star hotel near the small town I stay at in Hainan is empty every day, but the local four star hotels for Chinese tourists are packed every night. I'm not so sure China is as dependent on us as they used to be now that internal markets are developing, nor do they really wish to go back to the old days of accepting borrowed worthless U.S.paper money in exchange for manufactured goods.

        1. Uncle Miltie   15 years ago

          In the long run, we'll all be dead, so who cares?
          Unless you're into religion, then this won't happen until we're dead or too old to care.

  14. Xeones   15 years ago

    Sweet'n'Low, that IS graded on a curve, and yet somehow there are still no As.

  15. Art-P.O.G.   15 years ago

    This cartoon: Grade A, Good Job, Bok! Excellent art and funny.

    As for the tangential conversation: regarding the H&R trolls, there should be a quality scale (curved). At the high end, there are the likes of Lonewacko (who might be a monomaniac but at least occasionally contributes something worthwhile) and Anonymity Guy (the frat-boy A.I. equivalent), toward the middle are the Underzogs, Dick Hostes and H.F. Wolffs who are tiresome, reprehensible ideologues, but dammit at least they try. Toward the bottom are the many graduates of the Edward "Lefiti" Morris school of lazy drive-by partisan trolling.

    1. brotherben   15 years ago

      re: underzog, richard hoste. Are they a troll if they really believe what the say?

      1. Art-P.O.G.   15 years ago

        Yes. Trolls often believe what they are saying. The "sincere" troll is but one variety of troll. Note that dick hoste and underzog, etc. rarely engage someone on any issue other than their pet theories and also inject their ideology into conversations that have little to nothing to do with it. JMO.

        1. Channeling Underzog   15 years ago

          Typical Libertarian, hating on the Juice.

          There's no need to fear...

      2. SugarFree   15 years ago

        I'm fine with defining a troll as anyone who consistently posts in bad faith.

        Zoggy, Dickie, Donderooooo, and the occasional "OMG (T)reason!" Paulettes and Lewrockwellites are just assholes, outraged that we don't automatically agree with their twisted world view.

        The various incarnations of Edward are griefers. LoneFuckwad is just a hateful linkwhore. And obviously has severe mental disorders.

        1. SugarFree   15 years ago

          Ah, addendum...

          I forgot to add that the second paragraph, the assholes, become trolls once it is made clear that we don't agree with them and they then begin to post in bad faith.

          There's someone else I won't mention that fits that criteria as well, but only alienates a portion of the board with his monomaniacal obessions and keeps their head barely above water troll-wise.

          And it's not MNG.

    2. Hal   15 years ago

      "Toward the bottom are the many graduates of the Edward "Lefiti" Morris school of lazy drive-by partisan trolling."

      And at the very bottom, Tony.

  16. Xeones   15 years ago

    Are they a troll if they really believe what the say?

    O yes. They may be soaked in Crazy Sauce, but they are trolls nonetheless.

  17. Mike M.   15 years ago

    You know the socialists are getting nervous when they're even trolling the cartoons.

    1. SugarFree   15 years ago

      They realized that San Francisco Tony/Chad wasn't around to annoy us with bad faith bullshit until the afternoon. So we got assigned some East Coasters to fill in.

  18. Xeones   15 years ago

    Mike M., it's normally the REGULARS who troll the cartoons here. The socialists are just trying to fill the void created by a relatively decent Funny.

  19. domoarrigato   15 years ago

    Socialists dont have a sense of humor, there is no such thing as a cartoon - only propaganda.

    1. Uncle Miltie   15 years ago

      I honestly don't see what's so funny about this and I'm not a socialist nor did I vote for Obama.

      What did you want him to do?
      rear off his clothes and yell "JOHN WAYNE, MOTHERFUCKERS, JOHN WAYNE!" while dropkicking the leaders and then raping them?

      Now that would've been funny!

  20. db   15 years ago

    I think we should require the trolley to become ISO9000 registered. I want to know what procedures they have in place to continually assure a consistent level of trolling quality.

  21. Warren   15 years ago

    OMGWTFBBQ
    Sell all your worldly possessions the rapture is at hand. Bok turns in a winner.

    Funny
    On target
    Art not-so-hot
    Grade:B+

    1. Warty   15 years ago

      OMGWTFBBQ, eh. Are you an arfcommer then? Jesus, that place sucks.

  22. TheOtherSomeGuy   15 years ago

    The best cartoon I've seen on reason for a long time.

    Quality work there, Mr. Bok.

  23. db   15 years ago

    Gawddemmit- TROLLS. Not TROLLEYS. Tucking phony.

  24. domoarrigato   15 years ago

    And Chip gets an A- from me: highest evah...

  25. P Brooks   15 years ago

    Doesn't completely suck.

    Unlike the "Leave Obama Aloooooooooone!" mob.

  26. Art-P.O.G.   15 years ago

    Very well said, SugarFree. I think it would help to distinguish between the overarching category (large 'T' Trolls) and the subcategories of trolls, assholes and griefers (& etc.?).

    domoarrigato, you're right. Somehow, being a True Believer in a certain political philosophy seems to erode many peoples' senses of humor.

    Xeones, this Crazy Sauce sounds like a hell of a plot device.

    1. Uncle Miltie   15 years ago

      Or maybe this wasn't funny when Bush was President and this isn't funny now?

      1. Death Panelist   15 years ago

        Bush didn't bow unless he was punching a foreign leader in the dick (apparently). So there's nothing funny about a cartoon of that.

        1. Uncle Miltie   15 years ago

          Oh, he loved him some Saudi tongue alright.

        2. Sadist   15 years ago

          Punching them in the dick? Now there's a cartoon I'd like to see!

          1. eds   15 years ago

            If punching, you mean gently caressing arab scrotum with his Connecticut cowboy tongue, then yes.

  27. Reformed Republican   15 years ago

    The best cartoon I've seen on reason for a long time.
    Only if you ignore Peter Bagge.

  28. Xeones   15 years ago

    What did you want him to do?
    rear off his clothes and yell "JOHN WAYNE, MOTHERFUCKERS, JOHN WAYNE!" while dropkicking the leaders and then raping them?

    Oh my word yes. How awesome would that have been? I live right next to the largest naval base in the world, so i'd be one of the first to go in the ensuing nuclear fireball, but it would be worth it.

    1. Uncle Miltie   15 years ago

      Fuck, yeah!
      Hulk Hogan for President, Brother!

      And not the ball-less wonder that's haunting the beaches of Florida now.

      I'm talking about the cloned rebirth of Hulkamania!

  29. BakedPenguin   15 years ago

    Say, do you think he's about to get a Mickey's Wide Mouth and a Jet magazine at his local convenience store, too

    I thought Mickey's was the white boy's malt liquor. I know whenever I stereotype black guys, I have them drinking Olde English or Schlitz and reading XXL. So think about that while you're smoking your Newport, Art.

    1. Sudden   15 years ago

      211 Steel Reserve. High Gravity Malt brewed in Ft Worth, TX. Pair with a bucket of KFC (and none of that new grill BS). Tre magnifique!

  30. BakedPenguin   15 years ago

    There's someone else I won't mention that fits that criteria as well, but only alienates a portion of the board with his monomaniacal obessions and keeps their head barely above water troll-wise.

    It's not my fault if I talk about Lady Gaga all the time. She's got a really nice ass.

    1. SugarFree   15 years ago

      That's her face, dude!

  31. Art-P.O.G.   15 years ago

    Your stereotype is extremely accurate, Penguin.

  32. Hazel Meade   15 years ago

    Jesus H. Fucking. Christ. Someone go get the protocol book and bitchslap Obama in the face with it.

    Fuck.

  33. ed   15 years ago

    Give Obama's engineers some credit.
    Making an empty suit bow that gracefully takes some doing.

  34. Christian Louboutin   15 years ago

    Supposed to attack these head-on and you will find a deep sense of gratification thatwill fuel your happiness.

  35. Christian Louboutin   15 years ago

    Supposed to attack these head-on and you will find a deep sense of gratification thatwill fuel your happiness.

  36. abercrombie milano   15 years ago

    My only point is that if you take the Bible straight, as I'm sure many of Reasons readers do, you will see a lot of the Old Testament stuff as absolutely insane. Even some cursory knowledge of Hebrew and doing some mathematics and logic will tell you that you really won't get the full deal by just doing regular skill english reading for those books. In other words, there's more to the books of the Bible than most will ever grasp. I'm not concerned that Mr. Crumb will go to hell or anything crazy like that! It's just that he, like many types of religionists, seems to take it literally, take it straight...the Bible's books were not written by straight laced divinity students in 3 piece suits who white wash religious beliefs as if God made them with clothes on.

  37. nike shox   14 years ago

    is good

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

The EPA Is a Prime Candidate for Reform by the Trump Administration

J.D. Tuccille | 5.9.2025 7:00 AM

Review: A Doomsday Murder Mystery Set in an Underground Bunker

Jeff Luse | From the June 2025 issue

Review: A Superhero Struggle About the Ethics of Violence

Jack Nicastro | From the June 2025 issue

Brickbat: Cooking the Books

Charles Oliver | 5.9.2025 4:00 AM

The App Store Freedom Act Compromises User Privacy To Punish Big Tech

Jack Nicastro | 5.8.2025 4:57 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!