Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Policy

Hey Polar Bears, You're Blocking the TV!

Katherine Mangu-Ward | 11.11.2009 4:51 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

OK, that last post was depressing. So here's some awesome polling news to balance it out:

Most adults (53%) say being able to buy whatever kind of TV they want is more important than conserving energy.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Americans Not Hopeful

Katherine Mangu-Ward is editor in chief of Reason.

PolicyEnvironmentalism
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (52)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. James Ard   17 years ago

    Finally, some good news.

  2. Chrispy   17 years ago

    I wonder what the results would have been if they replaced "conserving energy" with "global warming."

    1. JW   17 years ago

      I wonder what the results would have been if they replaced "conserving energy" with your "choices artificially restricted by a single state?"

  3. James Ard   17 years ago

    Actually, only 53%? That's pretty bad.

    1. Upstater85   17 years ago

      Yeah... What were the other 47% thinking? I'm hoping they were thinking more about their budget and not about polar bears.

  4. JW   17 years ago

    I wish, just once, some manufacturer would tell California to fuck off with it's endless meddling, and pull their products out of the state.

    It hasn't happened yet that I know of (has it?), so putting up with the bullshit out of California isn't a money losing venture yet, or it is and no one is willing to go first.

    1. christmas.cx   17 years ago

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dvLZBv8HsO4

      1. JW   17 years ago

        An anti-Enron screed? Yawn.

        1. christmas.cx   17 years ago

          Nice rebuttal, valley girl. That's not an "anti-Enron" screed as much as evidence of how easy it is to game a state that's a screwed up as CA. At least Enron was more creative than you armchair freedom-fighters. Whatever Ken Lay was, he wasn't a whiner.

          1. JW   17 years ago

            Begone troll.

            1. christmas.cx   17 years ago

              More Mencken-like invective from the Smart Wing. See ya.

    2. Doug   17 years ago

      Ronnie Barrett, of Barrett firearms and manufacturer of fine .50BMG firearms, cancelled all outstanding orders from the State of CA as well as all counties and municipalities. He cancelled all maintenance and repair contracts with CA state, counties and cities. He did this in response to LAPD chief using a Barrett rifle, pulled from the SWAT armory, to shill for the passage of CA's .50 caliber ban. He even sent a couple of LAPD's weapons back, unfixed and COD.

  5. Agent Provacateur   17 years ago

    Hey KM-W, your staff portrait picture doesn't open up really big anymore.

    1. ev   17 years ago

      I'm sure I don't want to know.

  6. Nooge   17 years ago

    Bioshock is so much better on 50 inches of 1080p plasma goodness.

    1. Episiarch   17 years ago

      I'm going to have to see how Borderlands looks.

      1. Nooge   17 years ago

        Or God of War 3. I think that one might raise the bar a bit.

    2. Pro Libertate   17 years ago

      Just don't mention Fallout 3, as my children lost my DVD. Like lost lost.

      1. Nipplemancer   17 years ago

        did you lose lose your children shortly after?

      2. Nooge   17 years ago

        Ouch, PL. I was writing a comment about how badass that game looks on my TV, too. /empathy

  7. Warren   17 years ago

    America! FUCK YEAH

  8. prolefeed   17 years ago

    Cause a good liberal needs a huge 1080p TV to watch PBS specials on all the polar bears allegedly dying due to global warming ... wouldn't want to miss a single detail of the indoctrination ...

  9. prolefeed   17 years ago

    Most adults (53%) say being able to buy whatever kind of TV they want is more important than conserving energy.

    As worded, this questionnaire implies that 47% of adults want to add government regulations on TV sizes to the list of banned products, and only need another 3% of adults (or a healthy poll turnout) to accomplish this goal ...

    /glass half empty

    1. brotherben   17 years ago

      3% + 1

    2. Scooby   17 years ago

      (from article)Most adults (53%) say being able to buy whatever kind of TV they want is more important than conserving energy. However, 37% rate conserving energy as more important.

      That 47% includes 10% that either don't know or don't care either way.

      (from article)But a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 66% of Americans oppose a law that would effectively ban the sale of big-screen televisions to save energy. Sixteen percent (16%) favor the idea, and 18% are not sure.

      Somewhere between 16% and 34% are in favor of banning big-screen TVs that are energy hogs.

  10. ?   17 years ago

    /glass half empty

    47% empty.

    Or all empty, because we 53% aren't killing those idiots.

    1. christmas.cx   17 years ago

      Jesus Christ.

  11. Franz Kafka   17 years ago

    to watch Montel

  12. brotherben   17 years ago

    I'm thinking how porn, filmed entirely with a high def ultra high seed camera would look on a teevee that size.

  13. brotherben   17 years ago

    dammit. Typo. Ummmm. Put the "P" where you think it belongs.

    1. JW   17 years ago

      Sorry Ben, I'm invoking RC'z Law. You'll have to deal with him now.

    2. Attorney   17 years ago

      That typo is one of the funniest things I've read all day.

      1. Scooby   17 years ago

        The correction isn't bad too (didn't know ben was into WS).

  14. Old Mexican   17 years ago

    Does the TV come with the girl? She's hot.

    1. MJ   17 years ago

      Sorry, you have to supply your own girl.

  15. Rich   17 years ago

    Women are more sympathetic than men to energy conservation efforts at the expense of big TVs, but they're less willing to pay more for a television that is more energy-efficient.

    Ladies?

    1. Mad Max   17 years ago

      Don't even suggest that there's any kind of logical difficulty there - which I'm sure a sexist like you would *love* to do.

      1. Rich   17 years ago

        No offense intended, Max. Please let me rephrase that.

        Guys?

  16. bigbigslacker   17 years ago

    If any of you people are tight with Santa, see if you can't get him to bring me one of these this year:

    http://www.tigerdirect.com/app.....CatId=1830

    I haven't been very good this year, but I haven't gotten any worse either. I think that counts for something.

    1. anonymous   17 years ago

      Learn from Congress: you should build a certain expected increase of corruption into your plan for each year, so that if you don't become evil quite as fast, you can claim you've reformed a bit!

    2. Santa Claus   17 years ago

      Four fucking grand!!

      You better have been giving blowjobs to starving kids in India to warrant that.

      You many hours I have to subcontract the elves out to Nike to make that kind of money? Jeezus at least the Ron Paul folks just want bars of gold.

    3. Voros McCracken   17 years ago

      I had Santa send you a response, but he got marked as spam and gave up.

      Having seen the body of his response, I wouldn't get my hopes up.

  17. MJ   17 years ago

    I suspect that to the extent radical eviromentalism has widespread support , it is because most supporters don't believe that the regulations will affect their lifestyle choices.

  18. Zon   17 years ago

    Does she come with the TV?

  19. James Ard   17 years ago

    Rich, that was my favorite question too. Fucking bitches.

  20. Pro Libertate   17 years ago

    FREEE-DOOOOM!

    Man, I feel so much better hearing that. It's not that I oppose. . .yeah it is. I oppose.

    It's bigger!

    It's badder!

    It's too much TV for Mr. Incredible!

  21. Jennifer   17 years ago

    Ladies?

    No time for this one to answer bullshit TV poll questions; I'm too busy stockpiling incandescent bulbs before they become illegal.

    Three cubic feet worth of bulbs so far.

    1. Rich   17 years ago

      I am sympathetic.

  22. hinky niteflix   17 years ago

    Sometimes a girl just needs a big one, and damn the cost...;)

  23. The Libertarian Guy   17 years ago

    Who's up for smuggling some bootleg plasmas to California? I have access to a Ford extended cargo van, we could spray-paint "Save the Whales" on it and slap on some Obama stickers, just to make it past the checkpoints...

    1. Geena   16 years ago

      Be careful, TLG. You might get pinched for violating anti-"price-gouging" laws.

  24. bobzmoose   17 years ago

    Oh, I see. It should be mandatory for all citizens to use crappy light bulbs, but people want to have their 1000" jumbo-3D-HD-TV to watch their Blu-Ray copy of an Inconvenient Truth. "Greens" are weird...

    I should go on such a rant. Public support for the "science" of global warming is waning and large holes are being found in these "theories". But, alas, the "debate is over". -_-;

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Right-Wing Influencers Don't Understand What Makes America Great

Stephanie Slade | 5.9.2026 12:45 PM

New Jersey's Iconic Diners Are Dying. This Is the Wrong Way To Save Them.

C. Jarrett Dieterle | 5.9.2026 7:00 AM

Venezuelan Victims of Socialism Are Using RuneScape To Make Money

Katarina Hall and M. Nolan Gray | From the June 2026 issue

Reform Wins Big in British Local Elections, Reshaping the U.K. Right

Reem Ibrahim | 5.8.2026 7:00 PM

A Venezuelan Mother's Desperate Search for Her Dead Son Is Representative of Ongoing Human Rights Violations

César Báez | 5.8.2026 5:00 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks