Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Policy

The Next Logical Step in Stadium Welfare

Matt Welch | 10.29.2009 3:32 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

"[B]uilding a stadium during an economic crisis to house a team that doesn't exist."

Reason on stadium welfare here.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Breaking: John Stossel Isn't That Kind of Journalist

Matt Welch is an editor at large at Reason.

PolicyCultureCorporate WelfareSports
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (24)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Mango Punch   16 years ago

    well, is it "shovel ready"?

  2.   16 years ago

    [B]uilding a stadium during an economic crisis to house the Vikingsa team that doesn't exist. because no way is Minneapolis building yet another stadium.

  3. John Tagliaferro   16 years ago

    Obama can draft players into service and make a voluntary team. We can call them The Enlightned.

    Thinking the general manager can be a Czar, but coaches would be GS-12 through 15.

    1. juris imprudent   16 years ago

      Well, Norv Turner is a ready-made GS13.

  4. Zeb   16 years ago

    So, are there still people who still believe the crap about government subsidies for stadiums being anything other than a massive rip-off of taxpayers, or is everyone involved in such transactions just in on the scam?

    1. juris imprudent   16 years ago

      There are scads of them - mostly those who swaddle themselves in jerseys and jockstraps. Down here in North Tijuana we got a major case of "oh noes, the NFL will leave town if we don't builds them a new stadium".

  5. Richard   16 years ago

    Just be grateful that Chicago didn't get the Olympics. Oooo, the cronies who must have taken a bath on that one.

    1. R C Dean   16 years ago

      Hell, I thought I saw that some of Obama's White House staff had been buying up property in Chicago to compete in the Olympic Flipping event.

      1. BakedPenguin   16 years ago

        After making sure it wasn't in the areas to be designated as 'blighted'.

  6. Juvenal   16 years ago

    Already long ago, from when we sold our vote to no man, the People have abdicated our duties; for the People who once upon a time handed out military command, high civil office, legions ? everything, now restrains itself and anxiously hopes for just two things: bread and circuses.

  7. Your Good Buddy Johnny Clarke   16 years ago

    Excellent! We tried to ship the Seahawks down to kali in the 90's and they refused to go. Now we've got another chance. I'm going to start accepting donations for U-haul rental.

    1. dfd   16 years ago

      Heh. Nice try, but the Seahawks aren't going anywhere. Not with Paul Allen and his new stadium up there. Your chance to get rid of them was missed when you demolished that concrete monstrosity that was the King Dome to build Qwest Field.

  8. Doggie Style   16 years ago

    Is that bing.com picture a dog getting ready to fuck a man or is it the other way around?

  9. Steven Smith   16 years ago

    1. Most, if not all, of the money for the new stadium will be coming from private investors, not the public, so this isn't a case of corporate welfare victimizing Angelenos;

    2. If a new stadium is built, UCLA will almost certainly move in. The Bruins, believe it or not, have a football team, albeit a very mediocre one.

    1. Doggie Style   16 years ago

      PLEASE DON'T ASS RAPE ME! AAAAARRRRGGGGGGHHHHHHH!

    2. juris imprudent   16 years ago

      Yeah, and Pasadena is way more out of the way to Westwood then the ass end of the San Gabriel valley.

  10. Number 6   16 years ago

    Meh. I sent you guys a couple of notes when Kansas City built a new arena for a team that didn't exist (and still doesn't). Hell, the story even came with rampant eminent domain abuse and the complicity of the local fishwrap.
    I guess it's only interesting when LA does it.

    1. Geotpf   16 years ago

      ...and it's not even LA. It's the City of Industry, which, as the article correctly points out, is really, really weird. Basically, almost nobody lives in the city, and the few who do also all also work for the city. So that also means all the voters in the city also work for it. So every vote always ends up with numbers that would make Saddam Hueissen or the Soviet Union blush.

      The only reason this form of government works is that the City of Industry allows any polluting heavy industry to locate there (hence the name of the city). So the factory owners are very willing to put up with a mini royal kingdom in exchange to not be bothered by city inspectors. Well, the royal kingdom wants a stadium (as far as I can tell, the only public funding is from a City of Industry bond issue), so they get a stadium, paid for by taxes from a bunch of lead smelters and oil refineries.

      1. juris imprudent   16 years ago

        Isn't Commerce or Carson about the same?

  11. MJ   16 years ago

    "The deal was celebrated by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger as both environmentally friendly and fiscally responsible"

    That's funny.Environmentalists protested the waiver of state environmental laws, despite Schwarzenegger's assurances that a new stadium is practically a rain forest and despite Roski's repeated use of the word "green." "

    That's hilarious!

    "Beware, fans of the...Buffalo Bills..."

    Fuck you, Schwarzenegger.

    "

  12. Rhywun   16 years ago

    I think the Bills will stay in Buffalo. The region would sell its soul to keep them there. Hell, probably has already.

    1. Tulpa   16 years ago

      I think so too, but not because of anything WNY does to keep them there. Their soul isn't worth much these days.

      What will keep the Bills in Buffalo is the Canadian government's stick up its mountie about allowing competition with CFL teams.

    2. Aresen   16 years ago

      I understand the Devil is offering second mortgages on souls at least if a city is willing to build a new arena/stadium/ball park.

      What I would prefer is that instead of a secret ballot, all the initiatives for these projects require a public ballot committing those voting yes to personally guarantee and cover any losses with their own funds.

  13. creech   16 years ago

    Excellent proposal.
    And with every half-assed city proposing "minor league stadiums" too, we may be able to bankrupt the very people who think these are good investments.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Mothers Are Losing Custody Over Sketchy Drug Tests

Emma Camp | From the June 2025 issue

Should the
Civilization Video Games Be Fun—or Real?

Jason Russell | From the June 2025 issue

Government Argues It's Too Much To Ask the FBI To Check the Address Before Blowing Up a Home

Billy Binion | 5.9.2025 5:01 PM

The U.K. Trade Deal Screws American Consumers

Eric Boehm | 5.9.2025 4:05 PM

A New Survey Suggests Illicit Opioid Use Is Much More Common Than the Government's Numbers Indicate

Jacob Sullum | 5.9.2025 3:50 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!