Reason Morning Links: Walpingate, Climate Change Vote, More Protests in Iran, and Paying Teenagers Not to Get Pregnant
- Fact-checking Obama's health care plan.
- House climate change and energy bill comes to a vote today.
- More protests in Iran, and more crushing of dissent.
- Senate Republicans pressing Obama on fired Americorps Inspector General Gerald Walpin.
- North Carolina program pays teenage girls to not get pregnant.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Good news, Epi!
? North Carolina program pays teenage girls to not get pregnant.
There's already a program that basically does that, though. What is it called again? Oh yeah -- LIFE.
That was a pretty soft ball fact check.
But not everyone thinks paying kids to stay childless is the right way to lower the teen pregnancy rate. They say the program sends mixed messages, specifically to parents, that incentivizing good behavior is the way to go.
Oh NOES!
Dr. Hazel Brown, co-director of the program, said six girls of the 125 who have been enrolled for six months or longer have gotten pregnant or otherwise dropped out since it began in 1997.
This is a big story all over the Intertubes. Why now?
Paying teenagers not to get pregnant is clearly more liberal social engineering.
Will they also pay boys to not get pregnant? If not this is clearly sexist.
Cracked addressed Bay's "directing" recently.
If the incentive works. I'm personally a fan of negative reinforcement along with positive reinforcement.
Will they also pay boys to not get pregnant? If not this is clearly sexist.
It's run by a state university. They are already sexist, racist, classist, social engineering assclowns. So no, no they won't.
Say whatever you want, but The Rock is a great movie.
P.P.S. In case anyone replies to this, their responses will almost assuredly be ad homs delivered through sockpuppets, thereby conceding my points and showing the cowardly, childish, anti-intellectual nature of libertarians.
I could have used $3k for not knocking any chicks up while age 12-18. It was easy, due to involuntary abstinence.
Shut the fuck up, Kyle Jordan.
You know, I'd be willing to bet that many of those 125 enrollees are fantastic and sucking cock.
The Rock is a what? Is your power ring on the fritz?
*fantastic at
Truth hurts, don't it X? 😉
Fuck you til you die, Bay.
Truth hurts, don't it X?
You seem to be pretty fantastic at sucking Michael Bay's cock, yo.
What if an 18 year old wants to get married and have kids? It's not unheard of. Will she loose her dollar a day?
What?? Paying stupid teenagers not to get pregnanat? As if they arent lazy enough as it is!
RT
http://www.anon-tools.tk
That was a pretty soft ball fact check.
That was my initial reaction. Then I realized how few facts there actually were to check, and I decided to give them a break. This time.
To participate, girls must have never been pregnant, be enrolled in school, have a desire to attend college and have had a sister who gave birth before age 18.
Sounds like they're stacking the deck towards success. Anything to help prevent unwanted teen pregnancy is a step in the right direction. But maybe first, they should provide real sex ed, not abstinence only, and access to effective birth control.
But maybe first, they should provide real sex ed, not abstinence only, and access to effective birth control.
Sorry, in a rush here. I wasn't referring to the program, but rather some of the public policies associated with teen pregnancy.
Who doesnt have access to effective birth control? Do they card at Walgreens?
"You seem to be pretty fantastic at sucking Michael Bay's cock, yo."
Damn. There's some hardcore Bay hate here. Though, most of it's deserved.
The Rock still rules though. Ring's at 84% charge.
Please, oh please would you reporter dweebs quit calling every scandal and possible misdeed X-gate. Damn, it's fucking annoying...
proud libtard,
You are about 25 years late in your complaint. I was making the same complaint during "Irangate", which, fotunately, is more well known as the Iran-Contra Scandal.
Though, to be fair, there's an awful lot of smoke around the firing and limitations of authority on various IGs. By my count, there are at least 4 IGs who have either been terminated or told they don't have jurisdiction over major spending initiatives.
Once you remember that Obama is a graduate of the Daley School of Government (as is Rahm Emmanuel), it makes a lot more sense.
Try to imagine the media shitstorm that would have fallen on W if this had happened on his watch, and tell me the major media outlets aren't in the tank for Obama.
What, you mean like firing Attorneys General because of either disagreeing about priorities or politics? That one also seemed to get more attention on Reason, for that matter. (Though Reason also covered it because other people were covering it.)
Presidents like untrammeled power in the Executive Branch. The last President to significantly reduce Presidential power may have been Ford, and only then perhaps because he had no choice.
Con Air was good too.
Abstinence only sex ed doesn't work. Neither does "real sex ed," though. It's a bunch of complaining about practically nothing.
When I say "doesn't work," studies have shown that both kinds can do a good job of informing kids about STDs and pregnancy and contraception and the odds of various things. (One of the big "abstinence only doesn't work" studies showed that students who got an abstinence-only program knew significantly more than those who didn't have any sex ed, but having such a program in addition to other sex ed made no difference.) They just don't do anything when it comes to modifying behavior.
Con Air was good too.
GO FROM THIS PLACE AND NEVER RETURN!
I would be worried about IGs having to ask political appointees for permission to investigate stuff, but we've got The Right People in charge now, so it's OK!
Yeah, I'm sure this guy/gal's bosses in the administration are going to have a fit when they find out someone's echoing their position.
Has the anonymity bot ever won the thread before...?
Shut the fuck up, Tulpa. About Con Air, i mean.
Has the anonymity bot ever won the thread before...?
Goddammit, i wasn't ready for the Singularity today.
There's a post in one of the other threads by the bot that's pretty good too. Whoever made this one needs to start working on the programming for Living Doll robot a la BuffyBot from Buffy The Vampire Slayer.
There's a post in one of the other threads by the bot that's pretty good too.
The very best was when the bot called LoneWacko a "rancid piece of dogshit." It may have been a spoof, but goddamn.
"The very best was when the bot called LoneWacko a "rancid piece of dogshit." It may have been a spoof, but goddamn."
Holy shit! I missed that one damnit!
Dude, I think Skynet's online and like visiting Hit & Run.
Nothing but undying hatred will be tolerated when refering to the anonymity dude. You hear me! Undying hatred!!!
Con Air? Man, that really sucked.
WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that a school's strip search of an Arizona teenage girl accused of having prescription-strength ibuprofen was illegal.
In an 8-1 ruling, the justices said school officials violated the law with their search of Savana Redding in the rural eastern Arizona town of Safford.
http://www.startribune.com/lifestyle/49089496.html?elr=KArksLckD8EQDUoaEyqyP4O:DW3ckUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aUUsZ
Con Air. Accent on the "con". I want my money back, dammit!
"Buffy The Vampire Slayer"
I would so fuck Willow!
The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that a school's strip search of an Arizona teenage girl accused of having prescription-strength ibuprofen was illegal.
Thomas dissented. He goes down a notch in my book.
Freaky that Thomas was the dissenter in this decision.
"I would so fuck Willow!"
Yeah Willow's my first choice from that show followed by Faith, then Buffy.
Mmmmm, WillowBot...
I'm concerned by the straight men who know the characters from a chick show. Apparently "straight" will have be used relatively here. 😉
"Thomas warned that the majority's decision could backfire. "Redding would not have been the first person to conceal pills in her undergarments," he said. "Nor will she be the last after today's decision, which announces the safest place to secrete contraband in school."
So, ol' Clarence thinks it's ok to up and fiddle a little cooter in order to find some pills or maybe some pot?
Fuck you, asshole.
Usually he's got a pretty ok position but I'm very much at odds with this one.
I would fuck Willow. Alyson Hannigan is another matter.
1080i is not kind to her on How I Met Your Mother.
How I Met Your Mother??? What?
Pretty much what I expected from Justice Thomas. If you grant the right to search, why draw a line there? 8-1 seems to paper things over a bit; several split rulings. To quote:
Compare to today's Confrontation Clause case, Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, where the Apprendi 5 of Scalia, Thomas, Souter, Ginsburg, and Stevens said that your right to face an accuser in person absolutely includes the right to face a laboratory analyst who produced a report, if you so wish. The other four, Breyer, Roberts, Alito, Kennedy, were willing to "balance" that right away due to pragmatism, but since it's written there in the text, Scalia and Thomas wouldn't.
Of course, the 8-1 is because some agreed that the strip search violated the Constitution but thought that the violation was established at the time, etc. So the concur and dissent in parts were on different parts.
Justice Thomas's position was brief. If you ban searches, that's one thing. But if you allow searches but specifically ban searching one hiding place, that's retarded. It would make more sense to just ban all searches.
"I'm concerned by the straight men who know the characters from a chick show."
Back when I was married, my wife watched the Buffy so I watched it with her. She also was a big fan of Bay Watch.
Those were her only endearing qualities; they proved to be inadequate.
http://www.2flashgames.com/2fgkjn134kjlh1cfn81vc34/flash/f-Alyson-Hannigan-2659.jpg
Continuing on the Supreme Court rulings today, has someone told Radley that Scalia (!) mentiones the possibility that forensic scientists might be under pressure to deliver results favorable to the prosecution, and must stand for cross-examination? It's in the Melendez-Diaz opinion.
As much as I hate to do it, I give kudos to Stevens and Ginsburg for being the only two justices who thought that the school officials should be held personally liable. If I were that girl's father, an "oops, sorry--we won't do that again" wouldn't quite cut it.
Thomas dissented. He goes down a notch in my book.
I started reading his dissent...it made me sick. I couldn't get past the 2nd page.
Okay, the radio just a second ago called it a 9-0 decision.
Im going with you guys but it seems confusing.
Issues all over the place on this one, I guess.
Neda Soltan's family 'forced out of home' by Iranian authorities:
The Iranian authorities have ordered the family of Neda Agha Soltan out of their Tehran home after shocking images of her death were circulated around the world.
Neighbours said that her family no longer lives in the four-floor apartment building on Meshkini Street, in eastern Tehran, having been forced to move since she was killed. The police did not hand the body back to her family, her funeral was cancelled, she was buried without letting her family know and the government banned mourning ceremonies at mosques, the neighbours said.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/jun/24/neda-soltan-iran-family-forced-out
I didn't say Con Air was a wonderfully edifying film, but it was fun to watch.
"Redding would not have been the first person to conceal pills in her undergarments," he said. "Nor will she be the last after today's decision, which announces the safest place to secrete contraband in school."
Unless he's talking about Butthash, I think that's supposed to be "secret".
Tulpa,
No, it wasn't.
I don't get how anyone can fail to like a flick featuring Steve Buscemi holding a doll while singing "He's Got the Whole World in His Hands". And Chief O'Brien chuckling while machine-gunning a helpless civilian aircraft.
I didn't even like it a little bit.