The Soundtrack to Your Life
Celebrating 30 years of the Sony Walkman
When Sony introduced the Walkman 30 years ago, on July 1, 1979, it was, in a sense, already obsolete: Both Sony and Philips were already well on their way to developing the compact discs that would make trying to surgically repair the distended guts of your favorite REO Speedwagon cassette with a paper clip mere fodder for misplaced nostalgia. Plus, a tape recorder that didn't record? How was that progress, except for the companies selling tape recorders that did record and record labels selling pre-recorded cassettes?
As NYU management professor William H. Starbuck recounted in the International Journal of Technology Management in 1996, even many Sony executives were dubious about the device's commercial potential. It cost more to produce than its target market-teenagers—was likely to spend. While Sony chairman Akio Morito championed the Walkman and ordered an initial run of 60,000 units, managers in the tape recording division, fearing the company would lose money on every sale, secretly halved the order to 30,000.
Fast-forward 30 years. You may not be able to find many pre-recorded cassettes at your local music retailer anymore. If your local music retailer still exists, that is. You can, however, still buy a Sony Walkman cassette player—and myriad descendents and spin-offs that bear the brand. Needless to say, those skeptical managers in the Sony tape recording division severely underestimated the demand for personalized mobile music.
The first Walkman weighed in at a solid 390 grams (plus 50 grams for the headphones). With its strong square lines and metallic blue finish, it was almost as streamlined as today's surge protectors. To emphasize its portability, Morito reportedly had a shirt custom-tailored with an oversized chest pocket in which to carry the 3.5 x 5.5 x 1.25 inch device.
Now, of course, any high-tech gadget that's not tiny enough to pose as a choking hazard to small children is not truly sexy. In 1979, stuffing a high-fidelity stereo into a shirt pocket—even a deviously engineered shirt pocket—constituted a miracle of sorts. At a time when microcomputers still appealed mainly to hardcore spreadsheet fetishists, the Walkman was the sexiest piece of personal electronics ever devised. It was a piece of the future you could hold in your hand.
Indeed, all that an LED watch could do was help you see the time in movie theaters, while the pocket calculator only helped you get bored with math faster. In contrast, the Walkman wasn't just a machine, something you used pragmatically, intermittently. The Walkman gave you your own personal soundtrack with which to dramatize your life. It was your faithful companion, an anthropomorphized buddy/servant who motivated you, palliated you, and simply kept you company throughout the day. It was your cassette pet.
Six months after its debut in Japan, the device reached American shores. It cost $200, or $589 in 2009 dollars. At Bloomingdale's, the New York Times reported, there was a four to eight-week waiting list to obtain one. Impatient trendsetters offered to pay as much as $300 for display models.
Despite the high price, the Walkman was ultimately a leveling device. A few years earlier, portable stereo systems—boomboxes—had liberated those who wanted to take their music with them everywhere from the tyranny of Top 40 playlists. But boomboxes offered sonic freedom only to those who were strong enough to lug a battery-eating briefcase around and intimidating enough to impose their love of The Village People on others without censure. For anyone with $200, however, the Walkman delivered the same aural sovereignty.
In early Walkman marketing efforts and promotional materials, Sony emphasized how the device could enhance leisure activities like roller-skating and bicycling. Echoing R. Crumb's iconic Keep on Truckin' motif, the Walkman's original logo featured four feet emphatically propelling the word "Walkman" along. Despite its status as a "personal" stereo system, Sony also presented the Walkman as a social device: The original model featured two headphone jacks, along with an orange "hotline" button that allowed two users to talk to each other over whatever tape was currently playing. This feature, Sony executives believed, would keep the Walkman from being perceived as selfish.
They shouldn't have worried. Just a few years earlier, after all, Tom Wolfe had dubbed the 1970s the Me Decade. "Have it your way!" Burger King insisted to potential customers. Consumers were eager to turn listening to music into a solitary, immersive experience. And they didn't necessarily want to have to put on a pair of running shoes to enjoy their Walkmans either. Indeed, as much Sony positioned the device as an accessory for the sort of kinetic, upbeat fun that transpired in nominally social contexts, that was only one way to use it.
The Walkman also served as an extremely effective "Do Not Disturb" sign. Take a book on the subway to discourage interaction with fellow travelers, and you were likely to inspire inquiries about the book. Take a Walkman, and you were suddenly as inaccessible as a lone car commuter protected by the glass and steel of his GM sedan. As effective as the Walkman was in pushing us toward Rocky-like moments of transcendence on the treadmill, its most unique attribute was its ability to enhance life's lesser moments.
In grocery store lines, school cafeterias, airport lounge holding pens, boring college lectures, and every other public or semi-public place where blabbermouths with boundary issues once wielded absolute license to accost you, a new sense of privacy came into existence The Walkman was so good at enveloping its users in a no-fly zone of self-containment it even made private life more private. It didn't matter if you were at the dinner table, in the family room, in the marital bed—with a pair of Walkman headphones clamped to your head, you were clearly otherwise engaged.
Or, to hear critics tell it, disengaged. While initial accounts of the Walkman often touted it as a civil alternative to boomboxes, the "growing headphone movement," as the New York Times ominously dubbed it in 1981, prompted charges that the Walkman was "socially alienating" and "destructive of relationships." No doubt this was true in some cases—but if retreating to the harrowing cocoon of Huey Lewis and the News for hours on end represented a viable means of escape for one half of an unhappy marriage, that union was already too far gone to save. And what, really, was so great about the random moments of social interaction the Walkman deterred? Except for affairs, small talk about the weather, and the occasional plan to outsource the murder of one's spouse, not much ever came from talking to strangers on a train. Prior to the Walkman and its spawn, people disengaged in public by blanking their faces and shutting off their minds. Huge chunks of life were spent this way, in zombie mode, doing nothing productive, nothing pleasurable.
As RiShawn Biddle suggested in Reason ten years ago on the Walkman's 20th anniversary, making mixtapes for our personal stereo systems (where limited battery life meant zero tolerance for throwaway songs) whetted our appetites for the coming age of interactivity. To further prep us for the way we live now, the Walkman also popularized the notion that downtime was no longer necessary, that we could assuage our restless dissatisfaction with something more nourishing than the thin gruel of "I'd rather be sailing" bumper stickers.
With a Walkman, every moment could be, if not ideal, then at least more ambient, more aligned with one's particular tastes, more fulfilling. It made us realize we didn't have to just sit on a bus, as dead to the world as a plastic plant—or even worse, reading. We could be listening to Billy Joel! And if we could be listening to Billy Joel, couldn't we also be playing videogames, or watching movies, or laboriously tapping out 140-character messages to strangers on keyboards the size of a business card? And if we could do such things while stuck on a bus, or waiting in line at a grocery store, then surely we could do them while stuck in our cubicles at work, or eating lunch with our less interesting friends. Indeed, as soon as the Walkman hit store shelves, the looming promise of our highly mobile, super-empowered, hyper-productive future grew clearer: Never again would we have to endure the tedium of doing one thing at once.
Contributing Editor Greg Beato is a writer living in San Francisco. Read his Reason archive here.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
YouTube's blocked on this computer. Any American Psycho references in the links?
The first Walkman weighed in at a solid 390 grams (plus 50 grams for the headphones).
As opposed to a "gaseous" 390 grams? Speaking of gaseous, is Beato paid by the word?
Meh. He could've said "net weight" of 390 grams. Or "physical weight" of 390 grams. Or "metaphysical weight" of 390 quasi-tonnes.
I had one of those first US models. Came with a shoulder sling like a messenger bag.
Art-P.O.G.? movie, book, or album?
SF,
All three in one sentence constructed with a careless and superfluous amount of semicolons.
Next week's cutting edge essay: the socio-political implications of the Croissan'wich.
He could've said "net weight" of 390 grams. Or "physical weight" of 390 grams. Or "metaphysical weight" of 390 quasi-tonnes.
Or he could have dropped the boxing metaphor altogether. It's clich?d.
Next week's cutting edge essay: the socio-political implications of the Croissan'wich.
That was funnier than a whole month of Beato, and it "weighed in" at only six grams!
Yea, 'tis true that many of us under 30 may not appreciate the social impact of the portable stereo headphone listening device.
Hyper productive future? I see walkmans as the beginning of the end of civilization. Today's kids have to have constant musical gratification. I can't see them doing anything productive with buds in their ears 24/7.
Actually, you probably could tie such a bastardization of French cuisine to the widespread Gallic disdain for American cultural influence. Delicious, though.
Heh, teachers hope they can catch you with an iPod so they can confiscate that shit. I can't really do dishes (or homework) without music, though, it's true.
If nothing else, a Walkman made mowing the grass bearable.
Or "390 of your Earth grams" (OK, that's really bad).
When are we going to get a "Jon and Kate are separated" thread? Why is Reason trying to sweep this story under the rug?
Or "390 of your Earth grams" (OK, that's really bad)
It's an improvement in my opinion.
I'm cosigning that one, even though if you can push the mower with one hand while balancing a ghetto blaster on your shoulder with the other (thereby going through $85 worth of "D" Batteries monthly and also, presumably dressing like EricK Sermon), you can achieve legendary levels of groundskeeping cool.
When are we going to get a "Jon and Kate are separated" thread?
When they find a suitable photo of Jon and Kate Tweeting their respective illicit affair-mates?
Heh. The popularity/continued existence of Access Hollywood/Extra (as well as Nickelback) is the bane of my existence.
We can't forget about the hideous singing associated with Walkmans
the only real social hazard of portable music these days will be the public cost of hearing aids under whatever government healthcare plan we end up with. when i can hear your music playing on your earbuds from ten feet away while i'm listening to discordance axis with in-ear canal phones...it might be a bit too loud, people.
dudes who break into r&b mode on the train, though, are priceless.
presumably dressing like EricK Sermon
I really always thought I'd rock the Ozone look better. Trenchcoat and fingerless gloves are more my style. Don't know about the hat, though.
Sorry, better clip here
Video removed from YT
when i can hear your music playing on your earbuds from ten feet away while i'm listening to discordance axis with in-ear canal phones...it might be a bit too loud, people.
Car audio competitions killed my hearing long before the iPod got to me.
99% of what's wrong with me today can be attributed directly to the fact I heard "The Cars That Go Boom" at ear-shattering volume at least 300 times. Ugh.
When are we going to get a "Jon and Kate are separated" thread? Why is Reason trying to sweep this story under the rug?
Please phrase this question in a video, to be posted on YouTube.
I shouldn't blame only the kids for being music addicts. My wife cuts the grass with her iphone and she's listening to it right now as she runs on the eliptical. Maybe I'm wrong, and people will only be productive if you give them songs to listen to while they work.
...if you give them songs to listen to while they work.
Something like this?
Couldn't resist.
The young lady in the picture appears positively ecstatic with her Walkman.
It is like a mid 80's soft porn is about to commence.
My morning just improved significantly.
Enter: Karl Hungus
If someone had told me 30 years ago that one day I would be watching porn on my wifefriend's Walkman, I wouldn't have believed...no I would have believed them, and I would have been really excited by that.
sugarfree:
http://www.toothpastefordinner.com/011203/bass-car.gif
if i was idly rich i'd put this up on buildings all over the city. 20' x 50' of pure truth.
"the public cost of hearing aids."
Don't worry, dhex. The Volume Czar will set the appropriate limits.
Never again would we have to endure the tedium of doing one thing at once.
This statement is so preposterously absurd, it saved me from having to read the fucking article.
Thanx
I agree in some degree that having personal audio devices can enhance productivity or enjoyment while simply in transit on a subway train, where, in previous times, most people simply blank out. However, from experience, and talking to others with ipods, iphones and the like, I think most people simply listen to the tunes they've listened to for years and years, and in fact do not experience anything new. In that sense, there's no increased productivity or new entertainment happening with these devices. Afterall, if you want to get into some music, you really have to listen to it; if you are in transit, you can't really concentrate on the material.
"I think most people simply listen to the tunes they've listened to for years and years"
Bullshit. The Pandora app on my iPhone has turned me on to many new bands, and I'm a fucking geezer.
The link to the original logo doesn't seem to work:
You don't have permission to access /walkman/graphics/walkman-logo-cyan.jpg on this server.
Additionally, a 404 Not Found error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.
I loves me my Walkman descendant, the Sony Ericsson W810i. I only wish it ALSO played ANY of Sony's proprietary ATRAC/ATRAC3/ATRAC3plus formats... much better sound quality (not to mention smaller file size) than the mp3 format.
dhex,
I finally had to stop hanging out with car audio people because I developed a vicious allergy to Oakley Razor Blades.
their razors were too hot and fresh to handle, huh?
"Don't worry, dhex. The Volume Czar will set the appropriate limits."
well, most music players already have something like that. or at least the ipod does. doesn't fucking help, though. i don't know how they do it, actually, because volumes like that hurt like hell. or perhaps they're already deaf? dunno.
"SugarFree | June 23, 2009, 8:52am | #
When are we going to get a "Jon and Kate are separated" thread? Why is Reason trying to sweep this story under the rug?"
Where ya think Gov Mark Sanford was? There was a thread about his dissappearance yesterday.
I'm just curious which one he hooked up with.
their razors were too hot and fresh to handle, huh?
You can only fly close to the sun for little while, dhex.
I'm just curious which one he hooked up with.
It was a relationship or any thing, he just came in her hair. That's why it looks like that.
I shouldn't blame only the kids for being music addicts. My wife cuts the grass with her iphone and she's listening to it right now as she runs on the eliptical.
Your wife's not a music addict. There may be something else going on around her she's trying to drown out. Just sayin'.
unrelated question: How on earth did you get your wife to cut your grass? Share your wisdom, I'm ready to learn at the hemn of the master.
How on earth did you get your wife to cut your grass?
Well, I told her I wasn't going to cut it and that if she didn't I'd just hire someone to do it. Her cheapskate nature did the rest. (I'd rather pay someone because she bitches up a storm about it.)
Long before the Walkman, people used crappy transistor radios with mono earphones. Heck, folks used to listen to spark-gap radio on crystal sets. I also loved me my pre-boom-box Panasonic mono cassette recorder/player. I went to Radio Shack and bought a mini plug, some wire and a switch and made my own remote to use with the patch cord I picked up, and recorded mono mixtapes from the radio!
The big upgrade with the Walkman was that your private, portable listening was in dependable stereo. Yeah, you could hear stereo on FM radio, but depending on the station and how far you were from the stick, it tended to fade in and out.
I bought a WM-FX241 at the local Goodwill for $3.00 a few months ago. [AM/FM, cassette and digital tuning with 40 presets.] It is perfect for listening to the Mets blow another game, and it can even pull in distant stations in DX mode. 50 miles from NYC, and I can listen to WFUV without being tethered to the computer. It was a sweet find, as I left my last Walkman in a hotel room over a year ago, and I really didn't want to fork out to replace it. Those $10.00 pieces of Chinese crap they sell at Walgreens just don't cut it.
Kevin
the walkman also ushered in the era of the mass asult on the ears. it is a wonderment that there has not been a class-action suit against Sony for all the hearing loss to the Boomer generation, but then again maybe it's because a hearing loss is a net gain when you can't hear the crap the kids are playing now-a-days.
The WM-10 was, in my opinion, the best. It took one AA battery and collapsed smaller than a cassette box. It had Dolby and great earbuds. The only downside was the flimsy lid for the battery compartment; it was spring-loaded and tended to break. Until the ipod, though it was the greatest thing since sliced bread. And I owned Sony's top of the line portable CD player(777?).
My only point is that if you take the Bible straight, as I'm sure many of Reasons readers do, you will see a lot of the Old Testament stuff as absolutely insane. Even some cursory knowledge of Hebrew and doing some mathematics and logic will tell you that you really won't get the full deal by just doing regular skill english reading for those books. In other words, there's more to the books of the Bible than most will ever grasp. I'm not concerned that Mr. Crumb will go to hell or anything crazy like that! It's just that he, like many types of religionists, seems to take it literally, take it straight...the Bible's books were not written by straight laced divinity students in 3 piece suits who white wash religious beliefs as if God made them with clothes on...the Bible's books were written by people with very different mindsets
My only point is that if you take the Bible straight, as I'm sure many of Reasons readers do, you will see a lot of the Old Testament stuff as absolutely insane. Even some cursory knowledge of Hebrew and doing some mathematics and logic will tell you that you really won't get the full deal by just doing regular skill english reading for those books. In other words, there's more to the books of the Bible than most will ever grasp.
is good
is good
Thanks