Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Civil Liberties

Richard Nixon's Views on Abortion

Jesse Walker | 6.23.2009 11:18 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

According to newly released White House tapes, he was generally opposed to the procedure but was willing to make exceptions for rape or … miscegenation.

Elsewhere in Reason: Nixon's views on Archie Bunker.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Krugman and the Housing Bubble: A Love Story

Jesse Walker is books editor at Reason and the author of Rebels on the Air and The United States of Paranoia.

Civil LibertiesCultureHistorySexAbortionRacism
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (36)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Pink Cosmotarian   17 years ago

    "Raaaaaacist!"

  2. Mad Max   17 years ago

    '"There are times when an abortion is necessary. I know that. When you have a black and a white," [Nixon] told an aide, before adding, "Or a rape."'

    Steven Levitt has demonstrated, in *Freakonomics,* that if it hadn't been for legalized abortion, even more biracial children would have been born, grown up to be liberals, and gotten themselves elected President.

  3. Elemenope   17 years ago

    Nixon was kind of an asshole.

    Also, I hear that if you stand in the sun too long, you'll get cancer.

  4. Jeff P   17 years ago

    Nixon obviously meant that alien Frank Gorshin played on Star Trek...

  5. Mike   17 years ago

    Just when I thought my opinion of this guy couldn't get any lower... About the only good that came from him was the fact that the Libertarian party started to some extent because of outrage against his policies.

  6. Pseudonymous Margaret Sanger   17 years ago

    That's nothing. Let me tell you...

  7. Pro-lifer!   17 years ago

    If you are for abortion rights, it is not really logically consistent to get on Nixon's case about this.

    You should be happy because he wanted give mixed-race couples the right to abort their babies. This is a right he didn't want to give other couples. He was doing them a favor!

  8. JB   17 years ago

    Abortion...it's for the children. But especially them black and women children.

  9. replica watches   17 years ago

    i recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don't know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.The post from wholesale watches Company.

  10. Abdul   17 years ago

    I bet G. Gordon Liddy really regrets breaking into the Watergate hotel now that he knows this.

  11. MJ   17 years ago

    How is this relevant?

    Who looks to Nixon as a sage on any policy, especially domestic? The left hates him and the only liked him for being anti-communist.

  12. Rich   17 years ago

    Some of us will remember "Pull out -- like Nixon's father should have."

  13. Xeones   17 years ago

    I agree with Alphabet Dude. However, he's still not as bad as that motherfucker Woodrow Wilson.

  14. John   17 years ago

    Kennedy, Johnson and Nixon was just a run of loathsome Presidents. Nixon never really disapoints in his kookiness and generally being a louse.

  15. Barry Loberfeld   17 years ago

    From Abortion: Not for Women Only:

    How do we account for the chasm between the moral authority "feminism" commands and the actual amorality feminists demonstrate? Even more jarring is the disconnect between feminist rhetoric and gender reality. For decades now, feminists have held up as the primary example of sexual inequality the alleged "attack" on women's reproductive rights by "men." You would think that in 1973 the (all-male) Court nullified paternity laws but left maternity ("abortion") laws standing. You'd never guess that we live in a country where a woman has an inalienable right to her own body, but a man has an inalienable responsibility to the fertilized egg (one to be shared, in due course, by the taxpayers). But just who is attacking whom? Let's not indulge even for a moment the calumny that all men oppose legalized abortion (because they want to keep women "barefoot and pregnant"). Rather, we'll ask: What difference would it make -- to feminists -- if it could be shown that all men support legalized abortion? The answer is quite clear:

    * Catharine MacKinnon: "So long as women do not control access to our sexuality, abortion facilitates women's heterosexual availability. In other words, under conditions of gender inequality, sexual liberation in this sense does not free women; it frees male sexual aggression. The availability of abortion removes the one remaining legitimized reason that women have had for refusing sex besides the headache."

    * Judy Shea: Hugh "Hefner's misogynistic playboy philosophy inevitably leads to the destructive, dewomanizing practice of abortion. A[t] its core the playboy ethic is anti-woman and anti-child. The reality of the possibility of pregnancy and childbirth interferes with the Hefner dream of multiple partners and everlasting orgies."

    * Dorchen Leidholdt: "Sexually liberal men support abortion for women not because they want women to be able to control their bodies but because they know that unrestricted abortions heighten women's availability to men for sex."

    * Susan Maronek: "Abortion, in the final analysis, works to the advantage of the exploitative male, not for the female.... Abortion is a male sexual fantasy come true."

    * Sonia Johnson: Men "knew precisely what to do when women began refusing to honor the old contract, and I am absolutely convinced that their move was conscious, plotted, and deliberate.... So the men let us have legalized abortion, and almost instantly the energy drained from the [feminist] movement, like air from a punctured balloon.... [Roe v. Wade] keeps us colonized, our bodies state property and our destinies in their hands...."

    Feminist "thealogy" out-Calvins Calvin by damning men if they don't support reproductive rights for women -- and if they do. Indeed, it out-Orwells Orwell, as this metaphysical conviction of "controlling women's bodies" -- now with a smutty desire for sex without childbirth as the motive (in contrast to women's noble support for abortion) -- convicts those who, again, possess no such rights themselves. Like all forms of bigotry, it exploits its hate objects by scapegoating them for everything.

  16. Bingo   17 years ago

    Just need some Andrea Dworkin "all sex is rape" logic to seal the argument that those frigid bitches make.

  17. Randolph Carter   17 years ago

    A little birdie told me that the portrait up in the main war room of the New Hampshire Republican Party's HQ is one of Tricky Dick. So some people still look up to him.

  18. Lamar   17 years ago

    Sure, Nixon was an a-hole. But his view that there are reasons and justifications for abortion are consistent with the views of most Americans. Miscegenation is no longer seen as a valid reason, but rape is. If the pro-life people are correct, and abortion is murder, then how does rape justify murdering somebody other than the rapist?

  19. ..   17 years ago

    35-year-old opinions may seem shocking by today's standards...less so to Nixon's contemporaries. Smugness is a byproduct of hindsight.

  20. gmatts   17 years ago

    And don't get Nixon started on the Jews.

  21. Michael Ejercito   17 years ago

    If the pro-life people are correct, and abortion is murder, then how does rape justify murdering somebody other than the rapist?

    The same way the invasion of Poland justified murdering people other than Hitler, or the invasion of Finland justified murdering people other than Stalin.

  22. kiral?k tekne   16 years ago

    Very nice blog.Thanks for the valuable contributions to this site. Have good works.
    Thanks for your help...

    tekne gezisi
    tekne turu
    tekne organizasyonu
    tekne kiralama
    kiral?k tekne

  23. jordan shoes   16 years ago

    cigarettes

    wholesale cigarettes

  24. jordan shoes   16 years ago

    wholesale cigarettes

    cheap cigarettes

  25. jordan shoes   16 years ago

    cheap cigarettes

    cigarettes

  26. jordan shoes   16 years ago

    cheap cigarettes

    wholesale cigarettes

  27. jordan shoes   16 years ago

    christian louboutin shoes
    christian louboutin

  28. sunglasses   16 years ago

    Its really luky to find this blog,i fell so great!
    Jordans i love it,i support you always!
    the style always fashional!
    passenger by sunglasses 2010

  29. nike air Jordan   16 years ago

    A healthy body needs a good shoe, meaning you have to wear shoes for you. People can not lack sports, then you need sport shoes or casual shoes to exercise. I think air Jordan shoes are really good brand. Our website provides cheaper but high-quality shoes, hope you like it.

  30. nike air Jordan   16 years ago

    A healthy body needs a good shoe, meaning you have to wear shoes for you. People can not lack sports, then you need sport shoes or casual shoes to exercise. I think air Jordan shoes are really good brand. Our website provides cheaper but high-quality shoes, hope you like it.

  31. nike air Jordan   16 years ago

    A healthy body needs a good shoe, meaning you have to wear shoes for you. People can not lack sports, then you need sport shoes or casual shoes to exercise. I think air Jordan shoes are really good brand. Our website provides cheaper but high-quality shoes, hope you like it.

  32. new era New York Yankees Hats   16 years ago

    Welcome to our website?http://www.newera-caps.net,we supply cheap new era Boston Red Sox Hats, we believe that to bring you a lot of surprises.All our products are free shipping,non-tax,7days to your home,incredible discounted price for top quality products.

  33. Christian Louboutin 2010   16 years ago

    Christian Louboutin Pumps Discount
    Christian Louboutin Pumps Outlet

  34. yhwebcn   15 years ago

    Longines watches
    Chaumet Watches

  35. yhwebcn   15 years ago

    Longines watches

  36. yhwebcn   15 years ago

    Longines watches

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Refusing To Let Trump Deploy the National Guard in Chicago, SCOTUS Adds a New Wrinkle To the Debate

Jacob Sullum | 12.24.2025 1:55 PM

How 'Deck the Halls' Lost Its Booze

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 12.24.2025 8:00 AM

How Tariffs and Inflation Are Hitting Holiday Sweets

Fiona Harrigan | 12.24.2025 7:00 AM

How Robert Crumb Inspired the Underground Comix Movement

Jay Kinney | From the January 2026 issue

Brickbat: Cool Down

Charles Oliver | 12.24.2025 4:00 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks