Check Out John Stossel's New Blog
The libertarian host of ABC News' 20/20, John Stossel, has a newish blog out that is a great source if you trade in Free Minds and Free Markets. A recent snippet:
At my Princeton Reunion a few weeks ago, I participated in a panel called Wall Street, K Street, and the New Regulatory Era. Of course the panel turned out to be: 4 lawyers plus me. All the lawyers explained why my pro-free market argument was naïve. The lawyer to my right, Beth Wilkinson, not just a Washington lawyer, but the wife of Meet the Press host David Gregory, even personalized her argument by saying "John" while trashing the deregulation I championed.
It was all in good fun, however, and today it was more fun to discover that a few days later, one member of the audience, former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker, talking about hedge funds and private equity funds, said: "I do not believe they need to be so closely supervised and regulated as depository institutions. A presumption of government protection and support for financial institutions outside the "safety net" should be avoided."
I'd also like to remind the eager-to-regulate crowd that when the market tanked, the highly regulated banks suffered most. When their market capitalization was down about 50%, I remember that the unregulated hedge funds were only down about 18%. So why is regulation always the "solution?"
Stossel teamed up with Reason.tv to make the recent special Bailouts & Bull. Get a whiff below.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Why isn't it naive to think that government regulation is the solution? After all, regulation has a very poor track record.
You lost me at "At my Princeton reunion ..."
An eagle could land on his mustache!
Causing him to suspend bitching about frivolous lawsuits just long enough to file one against the eagle.
But he'd come to regret it later.
An eagle could land on his mustache!
My eyes well up with patriotic tears at the very thought of it.
I'm so thankful that you have brought attention to the Charlie Lynch / Owen Beck stories, keep up the press about the utter failure of the War on People! (or as Gov likes to say, the War on Drugs)
So why is regulation always the "solution?
When your only tool is a hammer...
John Stossel is hiding something. He just seems to be hiding something. It's a gut thing.
That he's one of the ten clones of Freddie Mercury dispatched after the death of Mercury Prime with one goal and only one...WORLD DOMINATION!?
Maybe you should ask the Californians about deregulation. They'll be happy to tell you how well it worked with Enron.