Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password
Reason logo

Reason's Annual Webathon is underway! Donate today to see your name here.

Reason is supported by:
Louis Emery

Donate

Politics

Obama Signs Porkalicious Omnibus Spending Bill, Spits in Wind

Nick Gillespie | 3.12.2009 10:32 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

President Barack Obama has signed the $410 billion omnibus bill, the last (though not final) big chunk of spending slated for fiscal year 2009 (which ends in September).

As Radley Balko noted earlier, this bill sets a record for earmarks, a feat that apparently got Sen. John McCain, a self-described computer illiterate only months ago, so hopping mad that he learned the Twitter to tweet his displeasure. Up next for McNasty: Mastering his newfangled Rascal personal scooter.

In the Wash Post's account of the legislation, Obama, who pledged to kill earmarks, comes off as a bizarro Harry Truman: The bucks won't stop, here, there, or anywhere.

[Obama] used the occasion to criticize the more than 8,500 projects, costing more than $7.7 billion, that lawmakers inserted into the bill, and he declared that "this piece of legislation must mark an end to the old way of doing business and the beginning of a new era of responsibility and accountability that the American people have every right to expect and demand."…

"Absent a genuine veto threat, he's just spittin' in the wind," said Rep. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.), an earmark opponent who walked through the House chamber yesterday carrying almost 100 pages of approved spending requests from a lobbying firm that is under federal investigation.

Sen. Russell Feingold (D-Wis.), who said yesterday that Obama is trying "to fine-tune a fundamentally flawed process," supports a constitutional amendment that would give the president a limited line-item veto authority, allowing him to cross out specific items and give Congress the chance to override those actions….

"The problem is not earmarks, the problem is secrecy which led to abuses in the past," said Sen. Daniel K. Inouye (D-Hawaii), chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee.

More here.

Inouye has it half-right, but mostly wrong. The problem isn't earmarks per se, which amount to 2 percent of discretionary spending (though they don't help). The problem is spending in general, which mostly happens in the light of day and which has exploded like a state-financed Mr. Creosote.

Planned spending for FY 2009 is already a huge record-breaking event, up some 32 percent from FY2008 spending (which comes at the end of huge growth under Bush to begin with). It will be higher still, as there are still some supplemental war bills and other things in the works.

Obama's first proposed budget for FY2010 is not as pricey as 2009's, but manages to boost spending over 2008's by a whopping 19 percent. Help out here—is that hope or is it change?

And when you think about that, and the way that Obama completely punted on this omnibus bill, Rep. Jeff Flake has got it all wrong. The president isn't spittin' in the wind. He's pissing in it. And it's blowing in the taxpayer's direction.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Friday, March 13, Bailouts, Big Spending, and Bull!: Drew Carey & Reason.tv in a 20/20 Special With John Stossel! Plus Live Stream at Reason.com!

Nick Gillespie is an editor at large at Reason and host of The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie.

PoliticsEconomicsGovernment SpendingBarack Obama
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Show Comments (21)

Webathon 2025: Dec. 2 - Dec. 9 Thanks to 636 donors, we've reached $464,226 of our $400,000 $600,000 goal!

Reason Webathon 2023

All Donations NOW Being Matched! Donate Now

Latest

French Study on mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines Finds a Drop in Severe COVID—and No Increase in Deaths

Ronald Bailey | 12.5.2025 4:25 PM

Warner Bros. Accepts Netflix's $83 Billion Bid, but Antitrust Threats Still Loom

Jack Nicastro | 12.5.2025 3:36 PM

Reason Webathon Woodchips Through $400,000 Goal Before the Halfway Point!

Matt Welch | 12.5.2025 2:20 PM

The 'Threat' That Supposedly Justified Killing 2 Boat Attack Survivors Was Entirely Speculative

Jacob Sullum | 12.5.2025 1:45 PM

What America Can Learn From Japanese Housing

Andrew Heaton | 12.5.2025 11:00 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

HELP EXPAND REASON’S JOURNALISM

Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.

Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREEDOM

Your donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks