Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Quotable

Radley Balko | 1.15.2009 12:29 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

"I certainly respect the Constitution, but we have some issues that are much bigger than the Constitution."

That's the "worst mayor in America," Jackson, Mississippi's Frank Melton. Guess what issue he's talking about, then click through to see if you were right.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Watch Out for the Brown Coffee, Man

Radley Balko is a journalist at The Washington Post.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (52)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. TofuSushi   16 years ago

    The corrupt capitalistic system is bigger than the constitution but baggy pants are not. Even on the larger oppressed minorities.

  2. Elemenope   16 years ago

    Well, the Constitution is only five pages long, so a pair of big jeans is almost certainly bigger.

    I see what he's getting at.

  3. Episiarch   16 years ago

    You know, sushi made of tofu sucks. Give me some hamachi, unagi, toro, or sake.

  4. Mister DNA   16 years ago

    This only proves that the Jackson, Mississippi City Council is in the pocket of Big Pants.

  5. TofuSushi   16 years ago

    Episiarch,

    Be kind to the sea kittens. Eat tofu sushi.

  6. R C Dean   16 years ago

    Isn't he really saying that he'll respect the Constitution in the morning, after he's given a good fucking?

  7. Xeones   16 years ago

    Well, i guessed wrong. Time to downgrade my opinion of folks yet again! Also, fuck Frank Melton.

    Epi: last night i marinated tofu strips in sesame-lime-chili sauce, covered them in coconut shreds and sesame seeds, and fried 'em. Delicious. Tofu can be a fine accompaniment to real food, if you do it right.

  8. TMOF   16 years ago

    Aren't the young folks who wear baggy pants, unwittingly, the new sans-culottes? I say ... off with Melton's head!

  9. Episiarch   16 years ago

    Tofu can be a fine accompaniment to real food, if you do it right.

    It is a flavor sponge, and not a particularly good one at that. Yes, you can make it taste good, but it has no inherent flavor of its own. Hence--no good in sushi.

  10. Nick   16 years ago

    I guessed drugs or terrorism. I wasn't thinking petty enough. My bad.

    I love that he's willing to go to court over low-hung pants. Very effective use of tax dollars, Frank.

    If they must write a law why not just say everyone has the right to wear pants all half off their ass and those that do so also have the right to be slapped upside the head by anyone over 40 (if they can catch them...you never know, maybe the baggy pants act like a governor on their speed, should be fun to watch on Youtube).

  11. TofuSushi   16 years ago

    Episiarch, try the tofu variety. It is good for mother earth.

  12. Xeones   16 years ago

    Hence--no good in sushi.

    Very true. That's why i ate mine alongside leftover Papa John's pizza.

  13. Episiarch   16 years ago

    If I am going to eat something estrogenic, I'll have some edamame.

  14. Shannon Love   16 years ago

    Just for fun, an argument can be made that dress codes do not violate the Constitution.

    (1) The Constitution does not grant the Federal government the power to implement dress codes but instead leads the matter up to the states. The Bill of Rights does not enumerate such a right so the 14th Amendment does not apply.

    (2) Sumptuary laws still existed when the Constitution was ratified so clearly the people of that time did not see them as being in conflict.

    (3) Federal and State governments do claim the power to regulate clothing in the workplace based on claims safety and identification (e.g. security guard uniforms cannot look like police uniforms). They also prevent the sale of clothing deemed unsafe for any reason e.g. infant wear. Of course, obscenity laws would also fall into this category because they regulate the minimal amount of clothes a person could wear.

    Given the view widely held on the Left that the government can remove any freedom except (in the best case) for the enumerated ones, it would seem that a local government would have the authority to regulate public dress as it sees fit. Indeed, 50 years ago, running around with your butt crack hanging out would have been considered a state matter of indecency.

    On another note, I am pleased to discover what has happened to Texas' usually bumper crop of crazy politicians. Apparently, we've been exporting them.

  15. Pain   16 years ago

    Clearly this is a case that shows why the Constitution should be considered a living document. The Founders simply did not foresee the scourge of modern day baggy pants.

  16. Pro Libertate   16 years ago

    What if Mother Earth considers fish to be parasites and wants us to eat them?

  17. Xeones   16 years ago

    Dudes who are comfortable with their manhood can handle having moobs, Epi.

  18. Pro Libertate   16 years ago

    In my mind, the Constitution is a set of heavy iron shackles, including the iron ball, that the government is locked into. Unfortunately, for some reason, we gave the government the key, an acetylene torch, a high-powered laser, a heavy-duty bolt cutter, and we replaced the chains with poorly woven Spanish moss.

  19. The Angry Optimist   16 years ago

    Shannon Love - interesting, but I think that free expression concerns would disallow such limitations.

    Of course, we still have public nudity laws. One wonder why they do not just expand those a little bit.

  20. SugarFree   16 years ago

    What if Mother Earth considers fish Sea Kittens to be parasites and wants us to eat them?

    Fixed. Now see how silly your question is?

  21. Episiarch   16 years ago

    So X, do you wear a "bro" or a "manssiere"?

  22. Xeones   16 years ago

    I'm build like a surfboard, E. A lumpy surfboard, but still.

  23. Tyler   16 years ago

    "He said the ordinance was an attempt to 'save all the children we can.'"

    Please, God, save the children from loose pants! Before it's too late!

  24. Episiarch   16 years ago

    I don't even know what that means, X. I prefer to think of you as you were in your carefree youth hunting white tigers in Burma.

  25. Mo   16 years ago

    What if Mother Earth considers fish Sea Kittens to be parasites and wants us to eat them?

    Fixed. Now see how silly your question is?

    My salmon Sea Kitten ended up looking like a cross between a catfish and narwhal.

    Also, tofu sushi blows.

  26. SugarFree   16 years ago

    Won't someone think of the tofu kittens!?!

  27. Pro Libertate   16 years ago

    Look, I'm eating the tuna. Gaea can either bless me for it or yell at me, but in the absence of affirmative direction, I'm assuming she wants me to order toro and maguro.

  28. Episiarch   16 years ago

    How about the sweater kittens?

  29. Pro Libertate   16 years ago

    Gaea demands that you free them, Episiarch.

  30. SugarFree   16 years ago

    How about the sweater kittens?

    They seem pretty comfortable to me.

    Cats 'N' Racks

  31. Episiarch   16 years ago

    Gaea demands that you free them, Episiarch.

    Is this "Gaea" hot? She sounds like a fatty to me.

  32. Ska   16 years ago

    As long as they don't have whiskers, I'm down.

  33. Robert   16 years ago

    I guessed "cheating at bowling". I think I was close.

  34. SugarFree   16 years ago

    Is this "Gaea" hot? She sounds like a fatty to me.

    She was fairly sexy in Rome. But maybe a bit zaftig depending on your tastes.

  35. Episiarch   16 years ago

    She was fairly sexy in Rome.

    The partner from New Amsterdam? Uh, I'll pass.

  36. J sub D   16 years ago

    More from the LEO/Saggy pants frontlines.

    Dateline - July 7, 2008
    July 7: Flint cops crack down on pants

    Flint residents now have to watch their butts because Police Chief David Dicks is on the lookout.

    Dicks, who took over the department last month on an interim basis, announced that his officers would start arresting people wearing saggy pants that expose skivvies, boxer shorts or bare bottoms.

    Dateline - January 14, 2009
    U.S. charges Flint chief of police with illegally taking public funds

    The city's interim police chief was charged today with illegally receiving public money through a no-show job at a security company run by his father.

    David Dicks appeared in federal court in Flint on a criminal complaint and was released on $25,000 bond.

    The complaint says Dicks received nearly $47,000 from City Security Guard Co. over a two-year period ending in July 2007.

    At the same time, however, he was actually working as a police officer or attending classes at Mott Community College, according to the U.S. Labor Department, which interviewed other security employees and examined Dicks' timesheets.

  37. Elemenope   16 years ago

    She was fairly sexy in Rome.

    If by sexy you mean satanically evil, yeah. She was sexy in Rome.

  38. SugarFree   16 years ago

    Elemenope | January 15, 2009, 9:58am | #

    Moral absolutism about complicated events and people is nearly as exhausting as moral relativism about simple ones.

    😛

  39. J. P. Carlo   16 years ago

    From the end of that article:

    "Melton is scheduled to stand trial in federal court next month on civil rights charges related to a police-style raid on a Jackson duplex in 2006."

    What exactly is a "police-style" raid? Is that like what Radley always posts about, but involving people who aren't actual cops?

    (Come to think of it, I'm not sure whethere that's a step up or down.)

  40. Not a Libertarian but You Migh   16 years ago

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Melton

    .
    .
    .
    .
    Controversy

    April 2006 - Melton was criticized for having potentially broken a law when pulling over four school buses on the busy US I-220 bypass in Jackson, Mississippi for individual hugs.

    Um.... What the fuck?

  41. Elemenope   16 years ago

    😛

    Never said Satan wasn't complicated.

  42. guy1138   16 years ago

    @ Robert
    I guessed "cheating at bowling". I think I was close.

    This isn't Nam, Robert, there are rules.

  43. TallDave   16 years ago

    I would have guessed Al Gore.

  44. Nick   16 years ago

    @ Robert
    I guessed "cheating at bowling". I think I was close.

    This isn't Nam, Robert, there are rules.

    One toe over the liiiiiiine.

  45. PFJ   16 years ago

    If this guy was mayor of Manchester in the late 1980's we would have never gotten the Happy Mondays or The Stone Roses. Think about that.

  46. Elemenope   16 years ago

    Fucking dog has fucking papers.

  47. Kwix   16 years ago

    J. P. Carlo | January 15, 2009, 2:00pm | #

    "Melton is scheduled to stand trial in federal court next month on civil rights charges related to a police-style raid on a Jackson duplex in 2006."

    What exactly is a "police-style" raid? Is that like what Radley always posts about, but involving people who aren't actual cops?

    In short, YES.

  48. Guy Montag   16 years ago

    Kwix,

    At least Radley calls them "military style raids".

  49. R C Dean   16 years ago

    I dunno, calling it a "police-style" raid implies that it wasn't conducted by actual cops. The one Kwix links to was, although they took a neighborhood auxiliary of teenage vandals with them.

    So, in my book, its still a police raid.

    And what do you want to bet some the teenagers had low-rider pants?

  50. Stevo Darkly   16 years ago

    Dateline - July 7, 2008
    July 7: Flint cops crack down on pants
    Flint residents now have to watch their butts because Police Chief David Dicks is on the lookout.

    Dicks, who took over the department last month on an interim basis, announced that his officers would start arresting people wearing saggy pants that expose skivvies, boxer shorts or bare bottoms.

    Other headlines:

    DICKS ATTACKS EXPOSED BUTTS

    WHEN PANTS SAG, DICKS CRACKS DOWN

    MEMBERS OF PUBLIC SUPPORT DICKS IN BUTT VIOLATIONS

  51. Stevo Darkly   16 years ago

    Dateline - January 14, 2009
    U.S. charges Flint chief of police with illegally taking public funds

    The city's interim police chief was charged today with illegally receiving public money through a no-show job at a security company run by his father.

    David Dicks appeared in federal court in Flint on a criminal complaint and was released on $25,000 bond.

    The complaint says Dicks received nearly $47,000 from City Security Guard Co. over a two-year period ending in July 2007.

    At the same time, however, he was actually working as a police officer or attending classes at Mott Community College, according to the U.S. Labor Department, which interviewed other security employees and examined Dicks' timesheets.

    Alternate headlines:

    DICKS EXPOSED

    DICKS DOUBLE-DIPPING

    DICKS SLAPPED FOR BACKDOOR ACTIVITIES

    Headlines we hope to see eventually:

    DICKS OUT

    DICKS TO DO HARD TIME

  52. steve   16 years ago

    When pants are outlawed, only outlaws will have pants.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

The Coming Techlash Could Kill AI Innovation Before It Helps Anyone

Kevin Frazier | 6.29.2025 7:00 AM

Social Security and Medicare Are Racing Toward Drastic Cuts—Yet Lawmakers Refuse To Act

Veronique de Rugy | 6.29.2025 6:30 AM

Comic: Henry Hazlitt in One Lesson

Peter Bagge | From the July 2025 issue

She Got a Permit for Her Chickens. Now the City Is Fining Her $80,000.

C. Jarrett Dieterle | 6.28.2025 6:30 AM

'We Can't Let These Sheep Go'

Fiona Harrigan | From the July 2025 issue

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!