It Didn't Begin With the Bailout
Timothy Carney points out that AIG is no stranger to government assistance.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Political contributions are just a risk management investment. That's what AIG does. no biggy.
I look at the bailout thus:
Leader of Senate: All fellow members of the Roman senate hear me. Shall we continue to build palace after palace for the rich? Or shall we aspire to a more noble purpose and build decent housing for the poor? How does the senate vote?
Entire Senate: FUCK THE POOR!
Naga: ultra vires.
Not sure that applies, Epi. Wouldn't it fall under the "just a bad business decision" function?
Well, Naga, I don't see where they have the authority to this.
But it doesn't matter anyway: acta est fabula, plaudite.
Epi,
Take some peyote. You should be able to understand then.
Refer to you Shakespeare, Epi. The show is never over.
I was merely referring to this bailout charade, Naga.
The show is never over.
All the world's a stage...
(sigh) I know.
If it makes you feel better Epi. Pro Lib has some WAMU shares he'd sell you. Then when they get bailed out, you can sit in on the shareholder meeting and heckle everyone.
Political contributions are just a risk management investment.
And they paid off, didn't they?