The Pursuit of Happiness

How economic liberty creates personal fulfillment


One of the pleasures of living in America is getting to argue about rights—what they are, who has them, and how to define them. In the last week, we've all had a rousing time debating the right to keep and bear arms. Americans can hardly talk about political issues without invoking these fundamental prerogatives.

Other countries may have a similar inclination to quarrel over whether people have a legitimate claim to religious freedom, a fair trial, health care, or housing. The right to life and the right to liberty, on the other hand, are common assumptions around the world. But only America was founded on a right that, even today, sounds eccentric: the right to the pursuit of happiness.

The delegates in Philadelphia who approved the Declaration of Independence had a long list of complaints about King George III. They excoriated him for maintaining a standing army, dissolving elected assemblies, imposing taxes without the consent of the taxpayers, and sending out "swarms of officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance."

Those are all specific, tangible abuses understandable to anyone. But the idea that the king was somehow interfering with Americans' propensity to chase after bliss was a novel one at the time. No more. One of the notable changes in the world in recent decades is the spread of freedom, including the freedom of each person to pursue happiness as he or she conceives it.

Letting people do that, it turns out, actually makes them content. This may sound like the most incontestable of truisms, but it's not.

Some science suggests that happiness is essentially a fixed commodity. It may rise or fall sharply because of events—getting a raise, breaking a leg—but over the long run, people adapt to those experiences and revert to their natural level of satisfaction (or melancholy).

Scratch that theory. According to a recent global survey, happiness is not only variable but on the rise in most of the world.

Two things, it appears, are needed to increase the supply of happiness: freedom and money. As it happens, a substantial amount of freedom is crucial to the creation of wealth. There is no such thing as a rich totalitarian country, as even the onetime totalitarians in Beijing finally realized. So in a very real sense, freedom is the key to happiness.

The survey, by the Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan, involved asking people in 97 countries two simple questions: "Taking all things together, would you say you are very happy, rather happy, not very happy or not at all happy?" and "All things considered, how satisfied are you with your life as a whole these days?"

What the researchers found is that in the 52 countries where the poll has been done over the last couple of decades, the percentage of people giving upbeat answers rose in 40. Among the places where smiles have been spreading are such developing countries as China and India, which have grown freer as well as more prosperous.

The same has occurred in much of the advanced world as well, including the United States, France, Canada, Denmark, and Japan. Only four countries (Austria, Belgium, Britain, and Germany) have gotten less happy since the pre-1981 era. They are all free as well as rich, which suggests those two factors are necessary but not sufficient for people to count their blessings.

Still, if money can't buy happiness, it certainly makes misery easier to bear. Some of us might rather be a depressed Brit than a sunny Sudanese.

The Germans also might take a more chipper view of their fortunes were they to consider, say, Zimbabweans, the most unhappy people on the planet. Small wonder, since they live under a psychotic tyrant who has wrecked the economy, inflicting hyperinflation and mass hunger.

The 18th-century English writer Samuel Johnson wrote, "How small, of all that human hearts endure, that part which laws or kings can cause or cure." The people who wrote the Declaration of Independence, by contrast, understood that if you want to be happy, it helps to have a decent government and a free society.

As it happened, they did want themselves and their descendants to be happy. They also created a pretty good model for any country that wants to be.


NEXT: Heckler's Veto

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Not that I doubt the claims, there are other studies that back them up to an extent as well, but saying

    Scratch that theory. According to a recent global survey, happiness is not only variable but on the rise in most of the world.

    is just saying you don’t understand science, or don’t care about accuracy in your writing.

  2. Well, at least this Chapman article is basically pointless and content-free as opposed to being stupid and annoying.

    Only four countries (Austria, Belgium, Britain, and Germany) have gotten less happy since the pre-1981 era

    Are the Germans ever happy?

  3. Episiarch,

    With that whole ragged dental problem not getting better, I can see why the British are not any happier. Can see it from here without even having to visit.

  4. You know what would make me happy? Seeing Less of Steve Chapman on Reason, that’s what.

  5. “Are the Germans ever happy.”
    Only when they have something to complain about.

  6. Of course, Mr. Chapman knows that it’s okay for the government to restrict a person’s pursuit of happiness through taxation, cause we all know big government won’t go away, so we might as well live with it. And Obama might vote like a leftist, but he’s not like other leftists.

  7. Are the Germans ever happy?
    When they’re in France?

  8. Are the Germans ever happy?

    When they become immigrants in the U.S.

  9. Happiness seems to be more a state of mind than a pursuit. All I can imagine when someone mentions the pusuit of happiness is a person chasing an unknown animal that’s always on the horizon; and instead of using a rifle with a scope to focus on the target, the person carries a club and becomes distracted by every bush and blade of grass along the way to the next horizon. (Yes, that’s psuedo-covert way of saying that I think the idea needs to be shot.) Tangible goals are worth talking about–and measurable, while happiness is vague and fleeting. Basically, I don’t think it’s worth discussing. I’d much rather talk about tangible rights, not states of mind that the government has no control. When the people concentrate on happiness and the government responds, you might as well get ready for taking your “soma” just like in Brave New World.

  10. Happiness comes from the barrel of a gun.

  11. Reading this article was like being handed a pamphlet with the inner pages torn out.

  12. I’m a grumpy little bitch
    who’s going to shit on this
    article because it was written
    by some guy who doesn’t
    want to vote for Lord
    McCain like I do.

  13. Certainly not the best of Chapman’s articles.

  14. Guy:

    Happiness comes from the barrel of a gun

    Amazingly, John Lennon (of all people) almost said that 😉

  15. BTW, if you had to live in the EU, you’d be pretty depressed, too.

  16. money can’t buy happiness, it certainly makes misery easier to bear.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.