Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Policy

Data: Arrivals Down, Panic Up

Kerry Howley | From the May 2008 issue

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

A new report from the Immigration Policy Center reminds us that immigrant arrivals have been down since well before the current eruption of nativist sentiment. The annual flow of immigrants to the United States was at its height in 2000. The Census Bureau and Social Security Administration predict it will continue to decline until at least 2015.

According to the study's author, University of Southern California demographer Dowell Myers, "proponents of the negative story of the immigrant future have ignored this recent leveling and decline. Instead, they have averaged data from the last 12 to 14 years and concluded that immigration is continuing at record levels." Myers notes that the flow to gateway states like California is way down. Immigrants are instead heading straight to places such as Missouri and the Carolinas, where they're finding jobs and forming small communities.

 

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Little Brother Is Watching

Kerry Howley is author of Bottoms Up and the Devil Laughs: A Journey Through the Deep State.

PolicyImmigration
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (32)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Not Lone Wacko   18 years ago

    Clearly KerryHowley is a light weight who takes corporate dollars and has SecretTies to the MexicanGovernment.

    Why doesn't she ask immigrants the tough questions, like this this and this.

    What about the NorthAmericanUnion, the NAFTASuperHighway, and the Reconquista?

  2. Lonewacko in Narnia   18 years ago

    Only the WhiteWitch can save us from Aztlan.

  3. Another LoneWhacko Mocker   18 years ago

    Even one IllegalImmigrant is too many! Build a 30 foot high wall from San Diego to Brownsville -- Teh Messcin Menace must be stopped!

  4. Not Lone Wacko   18 years ago

    I say a 200 foot high wall, with a road in the middle with LandMines on either side, than anoter 200 foot wall, followed by a NoMandLand nested with MachineGunners. Then we can put MichelleMalkin in charge of BorderPatrol.

    Oh God, I'm SoExcited now.

  5. LoneWacko\'s Mother   18 years ago

    Wacko, get outside and play with the children of our maid Junanita! You can't stay in the basement all day!

  6. Bingo   18 years ago

    Seriously, does anyone else think LoneWacko might be autisitic? Definitely displays some characteristics of Asperger Syndrome

    is one of several autism spectrum disorders (ASD) characterized by difficulties in social interaction and by restricted, stereotyped interests and activities. AS is distinguished from the other ASDs in having no general delay in language or cognitive development. Although not mentioned in standard diagnostic criteria, motor clumsiness and atypical use of language are frequently reported.[1][2]

  7. Lonewacko\'s memory of Ines Lo   18 years ago

    No, Lonewacko! I will not go to the prom with you! Ha ha ha! What could possibly make you think I'd go out with you? It's going to be so funny when I tell the whole school about this.

  8. Juan   18 years ago

    ThisThread is SoFunny...

  9. d   18 years ago

    Lonewacko, PleaseStopPostingMessagesWithLargeStretchesOfWordsWithoutSpacesBetweenThem.
    ThanksALot.

  10. BakedPenguin   18 years ago

    d, The open spaces allow the IllegalMexicans to slip into OurCountry.

  11. Orange Line Special   18 years ago

    Reason's contributors might want to consider how the comments above reflect on this site; clearly this isn't a site with too many grown-ups.

    Since there really isn't anything in this post, here's a couple interesting tidbits:

    1. Guess who the ACLU is working with. They aren't getting any money from them, but maybe Reason could strike a better deal.

    2. I'll bet Bryan Caplan wishes he'd thought things through a bit more.

  12. Naga Sadow   18 years ago

    Unless these "Mexicans" can tend bar and speak great English, I'm not worried about the immigrants who "tuk uuur jurbs".

  13. Cesar   18 years ago

    Reason's contributors might want to consider how the comments above reflect on this site; clearly this isn't a site with too many grown-ups.

    LoneWacko, do you really want to go there?

    I know I do! The following are real comments on LoneWackos little site.

    Gravatar why not the world's people?
    after all are we not all just one big one world people without any countries or laws or borders and soon without any homes or money or rights or life?
    just hand out Green cards by the billions to anyone who wants one.
    maybe Bin Laden will run for President after the last muslim Barack is done with us and all our heads are on some third world stake and maybe we have it coming? and maybe the Haitian gangs can fight the mexican gangs? isn't that nice?

    after all we can always ask the haitians to fight our war can't we?
    Fred Dawes | Homepage | 04.20.08 - 4:29 am | #

    Then theres this:

    Gravatar The big news bomb the Dems are holding onto for the fall: New NSA profile reveals McCain brainwashed while POW in VietNam, where he was also allowed the comfort of a "spiritual adviser," an Iranian Islamo-Marxist Imam. He is currently being watched closely for signs of cracking, as he may still be a deep mole programmed to socialize America if elected President.
    Emmanuel Winner | 04.22.08 - 12:22 pm | #

    Yeah, your site is full of "adults" alright.

  14. LoneWacko lolcat   18 years ago

    I can haz conspiracy theoriez?

  15. Bingo   18 years ago

    1. characterized by difficulties in social interaction
    2. by restricted, stereotyped interests and activities
    3. atypical use of language are frequently reported

    LoneWacko has Asperger Syndrome hahahaha

  16. Ben Rushing   18 years ago

    I have long suspected that the majority of hate for Hispanics was coming from the nearly all black and white communities of the Midwest who can't stand to see another minority group that acts different than they do. Can you believe that a nation who once feared the Irish Catholic influence now fears a bunch of hard working Catholic Mestizos? The best is when Black leaders say that they can't find work because of the illegals. Vincente Fox said it best, "They do the work that Blacks won't even do." LOL! Funny how the lazier minority hates the one that works harder.

  17. Kolohe   18 years ago

    The graph is confusing. What exactly does "percent change in new immigrant arrivals since 1980" mean? Specifically with the juxtaposition of 'new', and 'arrivals' I'm not sure if this is a first or second derivative function.

    If they are measuring 'arrivals' on a year to year basis, as I first thought when looking at it, then the assertion that 'immigrant arrivals are down' is obviosuly incorrect.

    But, it's more of an 'immigration index', that's measuring the annual arrivals, with a baseline of 1980, right? (So 1980 = 100, and it peaks at 2000 with 100*120%=220?)

    Or is it a measure of total immigrants in the population us currently having about twice as many as in 1980?

  18. old dude   18 years ago

    if (threadTopic == illegalImmigration)
    {
    threadPollutionFactor = orangeLineSpecial (oneMoreFuckingRant);
    }

  19. guy in the back row   18 years ago

    Is this why there was so much coverage of the Pope this past weekend? I saw on a news channel that Johnson met with Pope Paul VI in the hotel room of the UN ambassador, and nowwe get 24/7 news coverage of this guy?

  20. Jozef   18 years ago

    Ignoring the Lone Whack-offs; on the topic of the article: I must admit it's a relatively poorly presented chart. The decline between 2000 and 2010 is apparent, but because you are indexing it to 1980, it still looks quite out of whack, basically saying that in 2010 we'll see 120% more immigrants than in 1980. While that may be true, if you want to argue with lower immigration rates, it would've been a better idea to chart a graph around 0%, with year-over-year data instead of indexing the values. That would put most recent data into negative values, while hiding the spike in immigration between 1980 and 2000.

  21. Paul   18 years ago

    Isn't the predictable response that the panic is about "illegal" immigration, not legal immigration?

  22. johnl   18 years ago

    What kolohe said. What does the number 100 mean on that graph?

  23. B   18 years ago

    Nativist sentiment? What a surprise, Howley is accusing opponents of illegal immigration of being bigots, the latter day equivalent of Know Nothing party members. What a fucking joke. I don't think it is possible for her, or anyone else that "writes" for Reason, to engage in a debate about illegal immigration without smearing her fucking opponents first.

  24. MikeP   18 years ago

    B,

    Do you have a suggestion for what to call the sentiment that immigration should be tightly restricted?

  25. Chad   18 years ago

    MikeP: How about calling that sentiment "Respect for the law"?

    I want MORE legal immigrants. Lots more, actually.

    I want EVERY illegal immigrant arrested, fined, deported, and banned from the country for ten years. I am kind enough to grant them an "amnesty" period of three months to get the hell out, without consequence, before we boot them and make them pay for the bother.

  26. LarryA   18 years ago

    How about calling that sentiment "Respect for the law"?

    I want MORE legal immigrants. Lots more, actually.

    I respect laws that are realistic. Our immigration/temporary worker laws are completely unreasonable. Until they are changed you can whistle for the immigrants you want.

  27. MikeP   18 years ago

    How about calling that sentiment "Respect for the law"?

    Hmm. I'd like lots more legal immigrants too. In fact, I'd like the law to be such that there were no quotas or expirations on visas, maximizing the number of legal immigrants. That's a law I could respect!

    But there is still some significant difference between your sentiment and mine. You would allow illegal immigrants three months to vacate the country. Under my sentiment, the only immigrants who would be illegal would be terrorists or felons or carriers of contagion. As immediate threats to the public safety, it is unlikely that they would be permitted three months of quarter.

    Besides, doesn't this "respect for the law" sentiment beg the question of what the law is? If you got to make the law, what is the sentiment that would lead you to legislate that people who simply want to live and work in peace are illegal?

  28. Jesse Walker   18 years ago

    B doesn't seem to be aware that the 19th-century nativists were a mixture of people who opposed immigration out of bigotry, people who opposed immigration for other reasons, and people who opposed immigration for both bigoted and non-bigoted reasons -- just like the nativists of today.

  29. grylliade   18 years ago

    Reason's contributors might want to consider how the comments above reflect on this site; clearly this isn't a site with too many grown-ups.

    So's your face!

  30. embutler   18 years ago

    your article is as well thought out as your graph...
    both stink
    how bout the title should be "the rate of increase is down"

  31. Z   18 years ago

    I tracked down the site and read the article.

    Kerry Howley obviously knows nothing about Math.

    according to the report the rate of increase is down - meaning that total arrivals are still increasing, just at a slower pace.

    However, the data used to impute the slowing of the increase is not the same data that identifies the increasing rate of increase. So, there is a pretty obvious flaw - the new data collection methodology is different from the old, so unless it is calibrated using overlapping data collection periods - it is essentially invalid.

    I know it supports Kerry's prejudices - but it would be nice if she was something other than a complete hack journalist with no regard for the truth.

  32. nfl jerseys   15 years ago

    jtyut

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Lawmakers in Texas and Ohio Consider Abolishing Property Taxes

Christian Britschgi | From the February/March 2026 issue

The Supreme Court Is Poised To Remind States That the Constitution Doesn't Stop at the Liquor Store

C. Jarrett Dieterle | 2.7.2026 7:00 AM

Archives: February-March 2026

Reason Staff | From the February/March 2026 issue

Most Americans Hate Trump's Tariffs

Jack Nicastro | 2.6.2026 4:54 PM

The Trump Administration Is Taking Credit for a Long-Running Murder Decline

Alexandra Stinson | 2.6.2026 3:48 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks