Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Ron Paul Likes Non-Violence

David Weigel | 10.16.2007 2:47 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

I've put some video from Ron Paul's post-speech Q&A at the Robert Taft Club up on YouTube. Here's how Paul responds to a call for intra-candidate combat.

The rest of the videos are here.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Ending Employer-Based Health Insurance Is a Good Idea

David Weigel is a contributing editor at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (40)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Syphax   18 years ago

    Only sorta...

    If you want to get into fisticuffs, you've got to declare, fight it, and win it.

  2. Avatar300   18 years ago

    I bit the bullet today (so to speak), and donated to the Paul campaign. Donuts, with the promise of more donuts to come.

  3. not gandhi   18 years ago

    I don't know what Huckabee said to him. But the Giuliani comments from the first debate really were an invitation to a donnybrook. RP's a gentleman but there comes a point where he needs to set his jaw, point his finger, and say: "you take back your lies or put up your dukes--the choice is yours."

  4. DangerMan   18 years ago

    2 Pistols
    + 10 Paces
    __________________
    1 Less Politician

    Now that I think about it, dueling might be the answer to ad hominem attack ads...

    *sigh*

  5. Taktix?   18 years ago

    Kick his ass, Sea Bass!

  6. Isaac Bartram   18 years ago

    Now that I think about it, dueling might be the answer to ad hominem attack ads...

    That's apparently what Aaron Burr thought.

  7. prolefeed   18 years ago

    DangerMan -- allowing duels between presidential candidates might thin the crop of politicians, but it might also result in the most pro-war candidate being the survivor of a series of duels, leading to him or her getting elected.

  8. chancelikely   18 years ago

    Prolefeed - that's assuming the most pro-war candidate is also the one who's best with his fists.

  9. Warren   18 years ago

    When it comes to non-violence, Ron Paul kicks ass!
    Oh wait

  10. TLB   18 years ago

    If any Ron Paul fans want to reduce Huck's popularity, go to his campaign appearances, grit your teeth, do a gut check, and ask him this question. Then, upload his response and promote it.

    Doing things like that will have the side effect of making the MSM look very bad; while they're covering trivialities, regular citizens would be asking the questions they're afraid to ask.

  11. Rob D.   18 years ago

    FYI...
    Dr. Paul is confirmed to be on Leno, Oct. 30th

    Saweeeet!

  12. Taktix?   18 years ago

    allowing duels between presidential candidates might thin the crop of politicians, but it might also result in the most pro-war candidate being the survivor of a series of duels, leading to him or her getting elected.

    That's why you shoot the winner of each duel, just for good measure.

  13. Guy Montag   18 years ago

    At the last Reasonoid Gathering that I attended, the three Ronaholics seemed like nice fellows.

  14. f   18 years ago

    "but it might also result in the most pro-war candidate being the survivor of a series of duels, leading to him or her getting elected."

    No way are pro war candidates willing to risk their own skin. If politicians ever had to fight you'd probably end up with anarchy.

    Then again, if they could have duels by proxy...

  15. rho   18 years ago

    Dr. Paul is confirmed to be on Leno, Oct. 30th

    Wow. Happy Birthday to me.

  16. Jackson   18 years ago

    And now he's 5% in the latest Gallup Poll, up three ticks from 2% (and he was 4% previous to that). MoE of 3%

  17. Rob D.   18 years ago

    Hmmm, Leno was taken off the calendar for some reason on RP's site. Sorry for the quick posting, but it WAS up there. Possible re-scheduling?

  18. Joshua Holmes   18 years ago

    allowing duels between presidential candidates might thin the crop of politicians, but it might also result in the most pro-war candidate being the survivor of a series of duels, leading to him or her getting elected.

    That's why you shoot the winner of each duel, just for good measure.

    Thread won. Congrats.

  19. huh   18 years ago

    Will this enthusiasm for dueling politicos make you re-reconsider Andrew Jackson?

  20. Bernd   18 years ago

    Screw 10 paces. American Classic: Do it at 100 yards with rifles; glory to the guy who brings the pre-ban mag.

  21. Mo   18 years ago

    allowing duels between presidential candidates might thin the crop of politicians, but it might also result in the most pro-war candidate being the survivor of a series of duels, leading to him or her getting elected.

    I dunno, considering the most vehement anti-war Dems seem to be vets and the most vehement pro-war Reps aren't, I think the peaceniks would win.

    Hell, Cheney shot a guy in the face and the dude lived. Combat training would fix that.

  22. SIV   18 years ago

    huh,

    Andrew Jackson was against the Federal Bank of his day.There are aspects of Paul and his campaign that are downright Jacksonian.

  23. Regis Carnifex   18 years ago

    TLB,
    If any Ron Paul fans want to reduce Huck's popularity, go to his campaign appearances, grit your teeth, do a gut check, and ask him this question.

    For the benefit of those of us without multimedia privileges online, what question are you talking about?

  24. SIV   18 years ago


    I dunno, considering the most vehement anti-war Dems seem to be vets and the most vehement pro-war Reps aren't, I think the peaceniks would win.

    Kucinich isn't a vet.
    I know McCain is.

    Look at the pro-war Dems: Hillary isn't a vet, despite her attempt to join the Marines.

    Anti-War Republicans? Ron Paul was a Flight surgeon.

  25. NoStar   18 years ago

    Re: Dueling politicos

    God bless Aaron Burr. Too bad he didn't kill Hamilton before 1788.

  26. Harry Lover   18 years ago

    I just think it's sad that all mof the conservative tee-shirt girls get their cooter-boxes waxed.

  27. Regis Carnifex   18 years ago

    I just think it's sad that all mof the conservative tee-shirt girls get their cooter-boxes waxed

    I just wish one of them was wearing a shirt saying "I support traditional family values," or "Sex should wait till marriage."

  28. TLB   18 years ago

    Regis: the question is derived from this post.

  29. Regis Carnifex   18 years ago

    TLB,

    Thanks.

    Not sure why you're calling for a gut check before the question, unless you're counting on Huckabee's (apparently?) pro-immigrant stance as being wildly at odds with the GOP base? I mean, if I read the post correctly, Huckabee seems to have the more libertarian position than RP here, even if it is sketchy that he seems to be evading the rule of law and handing out special ID's to illegal immigrants. Is this just election season realpolitik?

  30. JParker   18 years ago

    Huckabee's position is more understandable if you remember that Arkansas is home of Tyson foods.

    Immigration is an issue that libertarians and big corporations can agree on. The big corps just want to be able to stick others with the external costs of their labor practices. A rational thing to want to do. Just like using lobbists to give your business model a legislative advantage is a rational act.

  31. Franklin Harris   18 years ago

    Speaking of "Ron Paul" videos, here is musician John Mayer defending Ron Paul, outside a club during a debate with the Mac guy from the "I'm a Mac, and I'm a PC" commercials:
    http://www.tmz.com/tmz_main_video?titleid=1243684715

  32. Guy Montag   18 years ago

    Andrew Jackson was against the Federal Bank of his day.There are aspects of Paul and his campaign that are downright Jacksonian.

    Andy Jackson, opponent of Socialism before Socialism had a name with his whole "in your face Supreme Court" throwdown! Second President of three from the Greenest State in the Land of the Free!

    RP ain't nothun' like Andy.

  33. Gene Trosper   18 years ago

    I have a sinking feeling the John Mayer video was just a goof. He's famous for jerking people's chains like that.

  34. SIV   18 years ago

    I don't know about that Guy. I was impressed by RP's statement on war to the Taft Club:

    "You declare war if you have to, and then you get in there and win it and then get out"

    (I wanna here more of that kind of talk, and he better get on it if he wants to win a GOP Primary).

    Why settle for Fred Thompson, hoping he is our best President since Reagan. Ron Paul could be the Greatest President since James K. Polk!

  35. Franklin Harris   18 years ago

    Ron Paul could be the Greatest President since James K. Polk!

    Ugh. Polk was terrible. This country hasn't had a decent president since William Henry Harrison.

  36. Guy Montag   18 years ago

    "You declare war if you have to, and then you get in there and win it and then get out"

    Pre-WWI thinking at it's finest.

  37. f   18 years ago

    "Pre-WWI thinking at it's finest."

    I'm guessing that is a compliment.

  38. Tom W   18 years ago

    Wow, Ron said "Huckabee" in the Taft Club video. Not long ago, I distinctly heard him say "Hucklebee" in a discussion about fundraising.

    There's something very endearing about how Ron Paul rarely talks about other candidates. It's certainly part of his appeal.

    This also holds true as dating advice for guys: avoid talking about other girls when you're on a date with someone.

  39. Eric Dondero   18 years ago

    Ron Paul proved once again why he is a pussy bitch. Vote for Giuliani, the Mainstream Libertarian running for president, not for pussy nutcase Ron Paul and his 9 Internet spammers.

  40. SIV   18 years ago

    "You declare war if you have to, and then you get in there and win it and then get out"

    Pre-WWI thinking at it's finest.

    Rolling Federal power back to a pre-Woodrow Wilson level is a good first step.

    If I remember my History correctly Polk resisted starting an aggressive war against Mexico. Fremont started it and then Polk did as Ron Paul stated above.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

If Trump Wants American Businesses To Thrive, He Should Get Rid of Government Subsidies

Tosin Akintola | 7.25.2025 6:15 PM

Trump Seeks Even Higher Tariffs: 'Between 15 Percent and 50 Percent' on Imports From All Countries

Jack Nicastro | 7.25.2025 4:47 PM

The FCC's Paramount/Skydance Decision Aims To Reshape Broadcast Journalism by Bureaucratic Fiat

Jacob Sullum | 7.25.2025 4:15 PM

Boston Judge Dismisses Over 120 Cases Because There Aren't Enough Public Defense Attorneys

Autumn Billings | 7.25.2025 2:22 PM

Trump's Tariffs and Japan Deal Could Encourage Toyota To Move Manufacturing Jobs Out of America

Eric Boehm | 7.25.2025 2:00 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!