U.N.'s Ban Urges Slowness on Iraq and Kosovo, but Some Speed Heading into Darfur
U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon urged U.S. policy-makers yesterday to exercise "great caution" in considering any rapid withdrawal of U.S. military forces from Iraq.
"It is not my place to inject myself into this discussion taking place between the American people, government and Congress," said Mr. Ban, who was expected to repeat the message during meetings on Capitol Hill today.
"But I'd like to tell you that a great caution should be taken for the sake of the Iraqi people," he said at a U.N. press conference. "Any abrupt withdrawal or decision may lead to a further deterioration."…
Mr. Ban also meets today with President Bush and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, who are expected to ask the secretary-general to beef up the U.N. presence in Iraq. They would like the world body to do more to address the country's humanitarian needs and to support its fragile government.
Mr. Ban said he also plans to brief the Americans on a U.N. timetable for installing a hybrid African-international peacekeeping force in Darfur, a priority for both the international organization and the Bush administration….
African soldiers are expected to form the bulk of the Darfur force, but Western technical, logistical and financial support will be necessary to get the effort off the ground.
Mr. Ban said the U.S. contribution "would be immensely important," but declined to be more specific about U.S. involvement.
Mr. Ban, who just returned from two weeks in Europe and Afghanistan, also told reporters he is "deeply concerned" about a stalemate in the Security Council over whether to recognize Kosovo as a sovereign state.
The United States and Russia have locked horns over the issue, and Mr. Ban said the lack of progress "will have a very negative impact not only on Kosovo but in the wider region."
The Bush administration has indicated it might move to recognize Kosovar independence without the Security Council, a move that would enrage Moscow and possibly encourage other separatist movements.
Mr. Ban said no party should "take premature unilateral action on Kosovo."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"No Sudden Movements" is a pretty good rule of thumb.
There was an editorial in the Boston Globe this weekend about Kosovo, proposing a grand bargain. Serbia gets the Serb-settled portion of Kosovo and annexes the Serbian "Republic" in Bosnia, and in exchange, the Albanian portin of Kosovo is annexed to Albania. Makes at least as much sense as any other proposals I've read about.
U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon...
Top UN guys always have awesome names. I think it's a job requirement.
Trygve Halvdan Lie
Dag Hammarskj?ld
U Thant
Kurt Waldheim
Javier P?rez de Cu?llar
Boutros Boutros-Ghali
Kofi Annan
Isn't Ban Ki-moon an Ozzy album?
I love this. The entire article is about the U.N. talking to the U.S. about what their foreign policy should be. Talk about an unnecessary middle-man.
Team America: World Police
Can someone please tell me again why the UN is not totally useless?
very nice posting
Bathmate