Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

For Your Polling Pleasure…

Nick Gillespie | 7.10.2007 11:58 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

RealClearPolitics is charting the latest presidential polls. The scoop? Hillary Clinton is still up about 16 points on Obama et al, and seems to be gaining momentum. Rudy Giuliani is up about 8 points on his rivals, though he hasn't recovered from a slight slump in May.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Staring Down Terrorism

Nick Gillespie is an editor at large at Reason and host of The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie.

Politics
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (15)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. FinFangFoom   19 years ago

    Man, it will fucking suck if Hillary Clinton wins the presidency. The only thing worse would be if one of the Republican front runners wins.

  2. joe   19 years ago

    I still feel like Democrats are waiting around for someone besides Hillary to emerge.

    Support a mile wide and an inch deep. Everyone's second choice.

    That's my impression, anyway.

  3. FinFangFoom   19 years ago

    Once the campaign really starts up, Obama might win it. I just can't see Hillary winning an election on the national level. If the war keeps going on until far in 2008, that'll be different though.

  4. Neil Young-Words (Between the   19 years ago

    Hillary Clinton vs Rudy Giuliani?

    shoot me now

  5. Cesar   19 years ago

    Hillary Clinton vs Rudy Giuliani

    Even Worse would be Hillary Clinton vs. Giuliani vs. Bloomger.

    A three-way, all New York race.

  6. D.A. Ridgely   19 years ago

    I continue to believe Hillary can't be stopped at least so far as getting the nomination goes. Gore is probably the only serious possible challenger and he's too busy playing Bono with a better tailor.

    That being so, it is a testimony to the hole the Republicans have dug for themselves that they may not be able to field a candidate capable of beating her.

  7. Lost_In_Translation   19 years ago

    While I'm still voting for Mr Paul, I'm a bit calmer today than I was yesterday on the prospect of the continuing loss of freedom in the US. Thinking back over the long term, maybe we really are just in a hiccupp period on the path to continuing liberalization. It wion't be a pleasant hiccupp, but maybe in the long term, we will be vindicated by natural tendencies of human society. In any case, I also realized I need to waste less time on Reason's Hit and Run and get back to work.

  8. Brandybuck   19 years ago

    While I'm still voting for Mr Paul, I'm a bit calmer today than I was yesterday on the prospect of the continuing loss of freedom in the US.

    Ditto. I'm still supporting Ron Paul, because he's the only candidate in the bi-party apparatus that won't have to hold my nose to vote for. But he won't get the nomination.

    However, I survived eight years of Clinton when every conservative said it was going to be the end of the world. And it looks like I'll survive eight years of Bush when every liberal says it will be the end of the world. So I suspect I'll be able to survive four years of Clinton/Giuliani/Bloomberg.

  9. Primus-John the Fisherman   19 years ago

    Clinton vs. Giuliani vs. Bloomburg.

    Coke vs Pepsi vs RC.

    and all I want is water.

    the illusion of choice...

    Speaking of three ways, here's a nightmare:

    2008 shakes out to Clinton vs Giuliani vs Ron Paul (who narrowly misses the Republican nomination and runs as an independent).

    the electoral college vote goes something like
    Clinton-246
    Rudy-135
    Paul-157

    No one breaks the 270 mark needed for a win. So the 2008 House elect gets to vote in the POTUS (from the 3 candidates) and the Senate elect picks the Vice Prez. Thanks to the GOP being bugfuck crazy these days, the Dems will own both the house and the senate elects and will dutifully appoint both of their party's candidates (Clinton and some southerner or another) to the White House.

    Then the DFL, having control of both the house, the senate, and the presidency, will proceed to spend our already insolvent republic to death.

    All Ron Paul backers will have to show for the exercise is an ashy mouthed "told ya so!"

  10. D.A. Ridgely   19 years ago

    No one breaks the 270 mark needed for a win. So the 2008 House elect gets to vote in the POTUS (from the 3 candidates) and the Senate elect picks the Vice Prez.

    Unless Republicans recapture the Senate, in which case imagine Hillary as president and Cheney's third term as vice president. Talk about yer divided government!

  11. Cab   19 years ago

    I think the most interesting polls are the Iowa and New Hampshire ones. Romney is taking both, fairly significantly. Everyone thought Kerry was done in '04 before he took both. Romney could win the nomination.

  12. crimethink   19 years ago

    I still feel like Democrats are waiting around for someone besides Hillary to emerge.

    joe, I think that's the way it is in both parties. The fact that Fred Thompson, who hasn't appeared in a single debate or really nailed himself down on any policy positions, can grab the lead in national polls by merely forming an exploratory committee...yeah, my party's fucked.

  13. robc   19 years ago

    DAR,

    The senate has to pick amongst the top 2 for the Veep spot. I dont think HC or RP will be picking Cheney as running mate.

  14. Pro Libertate   19 years ago

    joe,

    Agreed. I expect that she'll do surprisingly poorly in the primaries. She has to totally kick ass, what with her lead and funding, to even have a chance. She'll get slain in Florida--that's my prediction.

  15. Gene Berkman   19 years ago

    It is certainly likely that the Dems will control the White House along with Congress after the 2008 election, and will likely spend alot of money on new government programs. But the last 7 years have proved that the Republicans are certainly not going to govern responsibly either.

    Since Bush took office, the federal debt has grown by $3.1 trillion and continues to grow. Military spending is more than $400 billion higher than Clinton's last budget.

    We need a third party strong enough to be a visible opposition to big government.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Trump's Proposed Ban on Institutional Investors Owning Single-Family Homes Would Make No One Better Off

Christian Britschgi | 1.8.2026 5:35 PM

The Minnesota Fraud Scandal Is Just the Tip of the Iceberg

Veronique de Rugy | 1.8.2026 4:35 PM

Venezuelan Socialist Regime Announces Release of a 'Number of Important' Political Prisoners

César Báez | 1.8.2026 3:39 PM

Why Insulting Brigitte Macron Online Can Mean Prison Time in France

Jack Nicastro | 1.8.2026 2:49 PM

Elon Musk Said Rand Paul Is the One Person in Washington Who 'Gets It'

Billy Binion | 1.8.2026 12:33 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks