Secrets and Lies and Labour
How much of a break from Tony Blair does prime minister-designate Gordon Brown represent? Here's a hint:
Gordon Brown has rejected calls to block a controversial move by [members of Parliament] to get out of freedom of information laws.
MPs pushed the plan closer to becoming law earlier in what critics called a "shameful day for Parliament".
The MPs say they want to protect private letters from constituents - but critics say the move would also allow them to keep their expenses secret.
Punchline:
Mr Brown, who takes over as Labour leader and prime minister next month, has pledged more "open" politics.
Oh, the Yes, Minister overtones! They burn!
Earlier this week Brendan O'Neill reported on how Britain learned to love Big Brother Blair.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Come on, now. It's really not that outrageous to say that a government has legitimate reasons for keeping some things confidential or classified.
"Gordon Brown has rejected calls to block a controversial move by [members of Parliament] to get out of freedom of information laws."
Nice triple negative... Could the BBC write any less clearly?
No more expensive monitors from Pittsburgh, then?
Thanks Dan,
Your check's in the mail.
Mr. Gonzalez, I don't know why you're paying anyone to spread support for your ideas: there are plenty of useful idiots who will do it for free.
Sure, but we don't have to disclose it or anything, so why not pay them?
Oddly enough, exempt from this block is the UK's 'other' legislature, the Scottish Parliament in Edinburgh. There, the electorate have full access to their representatives' efforts in spending taxpayers' money - indeed, the leader of the Scottish Conservatives was forced to resign a couple of years back because his spending habits were a little too transparent.
Interestingly, Gordon Brown's Scottish Labour party just lost Scotland a couple of weeks ago to the SNP. First time in 52 years.
Sign of things to come?