Alexander Cockburn Fearlessly Decries Al Gore's Ties to Big Nuke
Last week I alerted H&R readers to Nation columnist Alexander Cockburn's newly minted climate change skepticism. To remind readers, just a tidbit from thst first Cockburn column below:
There is still zero empirical evidence that anthropogenic production of carbon dioxide is making any measurable contribution to the world's present warming trend. The greenhouse fearmongers rely on unverified, crudely oversimplified models to finger mankind's sinful contribution--and carbon trafficking, just like the old indulgences, is powered by guilt, credulity, cynicism and greed.
The redoubtable Russell Seitz also points out at his fascinating blog Adamant that Cockburn disbelieves not only man-made global warming but also the first law of thermodynamics.
Now comes Cockburn's second column peddling climate change denial in which he accuses Al Gore of shilling for the nuke industry. To wit:
The world's best-known hysteric and self-promoter on the topic of man's physical and moral responsibility for global warming is Al Gore, a shill for the nuclear and coal barons from the first day he stepped into Congress entrusted with the sacred duty to protect the budgetary and regulatory interests of the Tennessee Valley Authority and the Oak Ridge National Lab. White House advisory bodies on climate change in the Clinton/Gore years were well freighted with nukers like Larry Papay of Bechtel.
As a denizen of Washington since his diaper years, Gore has always understood that threat inflation is the surest tool to plump budgets and rouse voters. By the mid-'90s he'd positioned himself at the head of a strategic alliance formed around "the challenge of climate change," which stepped forward to take Communism's place in the threatosphere essential to political life.
Whole feisty Cockburn column, "Who Are the Merchants of Fear?" here.
Disclosure: I accept the IPCC conclusions on the possible ranges of future man-made climate change-some are disastrous and some are not. I also must confess that I am enjoying Cockburn's left-wing fulminations against the climate change conspiracy.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
A related issue is all the other interesting groups trying to ride the GlobalWarming wave, including ANSWER. Details at the link.
Satire here: petitiononline.com/gorefilm
Hasn't Al Gore dismissed more nuclear power as a possibility for reducing greenhouse gas emissions?
Don't want to quote without permission, but see: http://www.grist.org/news/maindish/2006/05/09/roberts/
If this doesn't make people believe in global warming, nothing will.
Dang, I feel sorry for the people who end up at my crappy blog when they're really looking for someone who actually knows stuff about things that aren't the Los Angeles Angels.
Wait... this was actually printed in The Nation? Only recently they had an issue titled: "The Climate Crisis: What Must Be Done" and had an article by George Monbiot, the battiest of moonbats?
from the first day he stepped into Congress
Did you just miss that part, or are you a moron?
"Hasn't Al Gore dismissed more nuclear power as a possibility for reducing greenhouse gas emissions?"
That wasn't much of a dismissal. More likie he is not thinking of nukes a as a 'probable' contender for GHgas reduction (as opposed to 'possible').
Wow, Cockburn AND Inhofe.
You must be so proud.
Gore in his book "Earth____" said that there is not enough Uranium to make a dent in the future need for energy. Of course, he didn't think of all the U in the ocean, which can be obtained, or the use of breeders and converters to make fuel out of Thorium and Uranium 238. Gore's stuff is always build on half-baked ideas, not fully thought out. But, what does one expect? He is a lawyer and politician- not a scientist or engineer.
Wow, a climate change denier suggesting that Al Gore is making money off of this.
I mean its not like he is charging 200,000 to speak or setting up a foundation that he runs to properly handle the money collected from "Live Aid" or donating money to his own company to offset his astronomical carbon usage.
Never mind.
Possibly it isn't that the core is heating up. Maybe it just stopped spinning? The evidence for this would come from a reliable source of course - Hollywood: http://imdb.com/title/tt0298814/
Wow, Cockburn AND Inhofe.
Got yer tickets for the shiny new Ark yet? Hop on the bandwagon and maybe you'll get a seat next to Mr. Alpha Male.
Let's see, some MSM scribbler apparently said something silly, and therefore everyone who agrees with him about anything is wrong. Is that what I'm supposed to conclude?
I don't lend much creedence to the opinions of politicians or about 99% of the scribblers, so:
http://climatesci.colorado.edu/main-conclusions/
and, regarding the bogusness of the climate models:
http://climatesci.colorado.edu/2007/05/14/another-unbalanced-news-reporting-on-a-research-paper-on-predicted-heat-waves-in-the-future/
"Publishing predictions which are not tested, is not science." (that's a correct statement, but he also points of the the models fail to 'predict' things which have already happened).
and
http://www.iceagenow.com/Kyoto_Pointless.htm
and, from Inhofe's site, the opinions of non-politicians:
http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=927b9303-802a-23ad-494b-dccb00b51a12&Region_id=&Issue_id=
Thanks for Cockburn's article. Anthropogenic Global Warming is a total hoax to revive the Nuclear Industry. I recommend Nuclear Saviors: How Global Warming and Al Gore may rescue the Nuclear Power Industry (link below). It explains how Gore and Clinton were darlings of their states Nuclear industry when they were congressman and governor respectively.
http://www.counterpunch.org/nukes.html