Bring Me the Head of Alan Garcia

|

In South America's version of the legendarily lesser-of-evils Edwin Edwards-David Duke election, incompetent former president Alan Garcia has won back power in Peru. He defeated the far-left military man Ollanta Humala, the leader of a failed 2000 uprising and a proud ally of Venezuelan Pres. Hugo Chavez.

The result is seen as a repudiation of Chavez and the far left. It isn't quite that simple. The fact that Humala got this far and scored more than 45 percent of the vote is surprising, and wouldn't have seemed possible only six months ago. When the campaign began, Humala was scoring single digit support in a multi-candidate field. As the campaign went on, the Chavez-backed Humala started gaining support, poaching votes from the non-Chavez backed leftist candidates. By the last week of the election Humala was in the lead over Garcia and free market candidate Lourdes Flores Nano. It was in this desperation period when Flores Nano and Garcia started hammering Humala for being propped up by a foreign leader with aspirations of bringing Peru into his sphere of influence—Hugo Chavez. It was a powerful tactic that kept Humala from winning swing voters in Peru's urban areas. He never got off the mat, and Garcia easily won the runoff election.

So while Chavez has been dealt a setback, he played a role in boosting Humala from the candidate of 7 percent of Peruvians to the candidate of 45 percent of them. And while Peru won't be shifting as far left as Bolivia or Venezuela, Garcia represents a shift away from the conservative politics of President Alejandro Toledo. But would it have ended differently if the US had loudly intervened in Peru, instead of letting Chavez bluster? Almost certainly.

I covered some of the issues here after the first round ended in April.

NEXT: 'How Can a Plant Be Illegal?'

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. So here’s the question to consider: Did the US stay out of this one because we shrewdly saw that it was only an opportunity to shove a foot in up to the knee, or because we just didn’t give a happy goddamn?

  2. Sort of similar to the American elections in 1968.

    People had long since discarded the corrupt old righty has been, until some scary, offensive action on the left made him the lesser evil.

  3. ^^ Except that Garcia was a corrupt old lefty running against a ridiculous lefty.

    Mario Vargas Llosa’s “A Fish in the Water” is half autobiography, half pretty entertaining account of his run for the Presidency of Peru in 1990, against Garcia and Fujimori. Llosa was and is a fairly libertarian guy – he was into Hernando de Soto before anybody, man!

    1. How was he on foreign policy?

      These days it is not enough to just be Libertarian in economics. I think The entire GOP is “Libertarian” if we just go by that standard.

  4. And no one’s going to acknowledge the Peckinpah reference? Maybe not one of his better ones, but still worth a look.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.