Can I Get Bush as My Accountant?
It's good to know that the tight the president has kept on non-security domestic discretionary spending has "saved taxpayers $14 billion." I sure hope there hasn't been any massive offsetting spending. And dear sweet flying spaghetti monster, is he really still peddling this canard about being "on track" to cut the deficit in half in ten years—a projection that depends on his not getting the extension of the tax cuts he called for just seconds earlier?
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Hell, why not repeat the canard - it's no worse than the geniuses who projected steadily growing budget surpluses for 15 years back in 2000. Remember the battles between GWB and Gore on what best to do with those huge surpluses?
Anyone who puts any stock in Washington budgetary projections is probably either a moron or working for the party in power (that often amounts to the same thing, of course).
I think during the campaign he promised to cut the deficit in half in his second term. Wait a few months and he'll come up with a new plan to cut the deficit in half in the next century.
Julian, I didn't know you were a Pastafarian. Welcome!