Self-Hating Canadians Tell UN Culture Czars (Tsars?) To Take Off, Eh?
A while back, Reason's Tim Cavanaugh attacked the UN's Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions like Bill Clinton with a pizza delivery girl, noting that two of the major malefactors in the deal (Canada and France) lap up American pop like so much Labatt's Blue spilled on the bar at 3AM NST.
Now Wendy McElroy, longtime friend of Reason and proprietor of the great ifeminists site--and a Canadian resident herself--turns her back on Maple Leaf protectionism. And she does so with the help of yet another Canuck cultural collaborator, Neil Hrab. Writing in her Fox News column (always worth a look), McElroy notes:
Culture is the accumulated knowledge, experience, beliefs, and customs within a group, which emerges over time and can be passed to others through literature, music and other expression. It cannot be created by government. You can't vote culture into being; you can't pass a law to turn a movie into a beloved classic. Culture emerges spontaneously and defies political control.
The freer a society, the more vigorous and diverse its culture, and vice versa.
Hrab asked an intriguing question in his commentary [at Tech Central Station]. "Thanks to the spread of personal electronic devices and the rise of sites where you can download content from the Internet, will this 'right' to regulate mean anything? Can governments seriously influence the viewing/reading/listening habits of citizens anymore?"
Whole McElroy col here.
The short answer to Hrab's query, btw, is yes: governments still can influence the cultural habits of their citizens. It's always a losing battle in the long run and--this is the key point--they can do it less efficiently than ever before.
For two signature Reason takes on the flow of culture across even the most iron of curtains, check out In Praise of Vulgarity (which ends with a glorious shout-out to "Hobbit re-enactors in Kazakhstan" and pachinko-playing dissidents in Cambodia) and "Bert and the Infidels" (which answers the question of how Ernie's longtime companion ended up standing with Osama Bin Laden in the streets of Dhaka, Bangladesh)
Requiem for former Molson pitchman "Joe," who moved to the US, here.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Up close, memes appear to merge into uniformity. From a distance, they head toward uniqueness. It's complexity, and governments will be the last to grasp what I'm saying.
I wish someone from the Santa Fe Institute would help me out here.
As I pointed out in the Nativity thread, humans are a tribal species and it has been so since we huddled together in caves for shelter, food, and mutual protection and afraid that the denizens of the cave a few miles away are going to come take what we have. As a result, we don't like difference and are repelled by anything that obviously isn't a part of our tribe.
The same can be said for culture. Returning to the Nativity thread, joe pointed out that we politically and culturally love to "mark their territory." We like to say "this is OURS and we will let no outsider or dissident sully it" That's more or less what's going on here. Rather than embracing new ideas and new cultural expressions, the tribe known as "Canada" is demanding to block anything that does have the scent of the Great White North about it. Not because they're afraid that American movies and TV shows are going to actually harm them, but because their egos will not allow the ideas of another tribe, particularly one as big as the U.S., to mingle with their own.
Neil Hrab's column is interesting, but as a libertarian-leaning Canadian who is still subject to assorted pinko tendencies, I would like to make two points:
1) Can we not agree that culture is different than other commodities? What this means for trade policy can be debated elsewhere, but they're just DIFFERENT, okay?
2) (From a more libertaian angle) As a record store owner, I have watched in amazement as Canadian music has gone from something I would be deeply suspicious of, if not ashamed (ie: "Which grant panel member did this guy blow to get this piece of crap pressed?") to something that I could actually be proud of. Bands like Arcade Fire, New Pornographers, and Broken Social Scene have become huge sellers in my little store.
They all benefited from government assistance, yes.
But they absolutely did not benefit from any trade restrictions, protection or Canadian-content rules.
In fact, on this last point, Canadian radio stations should be deeply ashamed of their lateness in promoting these amazing bands. Any radio station who defended their license on the grounds of some claimed mandate to promote Canadian talent should have their license revoked. For all the Canadian talent that is out there, Canadian radio still sucks.
And I would point out, these bands succeeded within the independent label scene, which generally lacks the government connections to influence trade legislation. They were among the first to realize that they operated within a global market, or at least a North American market, and understood that the protection of the Canadian government would not mean squat to a record seller in Austin. They were forced to survive, and because of it, they have more than thrived.
John B,
How did they benefit from public assistance? Did you mean that they benefitted from canadian content laws generally or was there an actual checque involved?
BTW, they really are three of the best bands goin' these days.
"Tsar" is the correct Latin-alphabet form of the word, using the modern transliteration conventions from Russian. "Czar" might be how the Poles spell it, though. Don't know that for sure.
Just a pet peeve of mine...
Can we not agree that culture is different than other commodities?
How so?
It seems to me that a boxcar of Britney Spears CDs is a commodity. And if Britney CDs are commodities, so are Yo Yo Ma CDs, no?
Ditto for books. And if a printed book is a commodity, then how is an electronic version of the same not a commodity as well?
Howsabout DVDs? Same boxcar, full of Lethal Weapon IV DVDs. And if Lethal Weapon IV DVDs are a commodity, then so are DVDs of Henry IV.
And if a DVD of Henry IV or Lethal Weapon IV is a commodity, how is a broadcast of that same program any different?
So, John B, did the USA have a casus belli against Canada when you guys inflicted Ann Murray upon us? Or was Rush enough of a quality offset?
Anyway, all rock music is derived from U.S. folk forms, so I guess Can-con is limited to Inuit music... 🙂
Quick! Ike! do your impression of David Caruso's career!
How did they benefit from public assistance? Did you mean that they benefitted from canadian content laws generally or was there an actual checque involved?
The latter - the current Magnet has an interview with e New Pornographers that has several amusing political moments, including the money they've gotten from the Canadian government. Other highlights include:
1) Canadian customs agents giving the interviewer a hard time because he said he was here to interview "The New Pornographers",
2) the interviewer's laptop getting confiscated so that they could inspect all the porn on it (presumably cached pages from surfing) to make sure it was legal and
3) endless repetitions of the whole "yeah, our medical system sucks, but at least we don't leave you dying in the street like they do in America" mantra.
>>MK: How did they benefit from public assistance?
If you look at the new Broken Social Scene CD, you will notice a "Thank you" to something called FACTOR. This is a government-funded program that extends loans and grants to Canadian artists. BSS would have probably received a loan, which theoretically must be repaid, but still counts as government assistance.
>>R C Dean: It seems to me that a boxcar of Britney Spears CDs is a commodity. And if Britney CDs are commodities, so are Yo Yo Ma CDs, no?
If you are grinding up those CDs up to make building materials, then they certainly are commodities, and please feel free to trade them away as quickly as possible.
However, those CDs do more than just sit in a boxcar. They influence attitudes, behavior, morality, and feelings about oneself. This is why such creations get the same protection under the First Amendment as ideas and religion.
Now, what would happen if someone managed to package up the idea of say, "Freedom," and stuffed it in a boxcar for sale? Would you like to see Freedom sold off to the highest bidder? What if the price of oil went a bit higher?
Now the fact that those CDs really are piled up in a boxcar does suggest that they are indeed commodities. I am just saying they are also something else, something that is different, and may under certain circumstances require different treatment.
In other words, I'm not sure it is a good idea to simply merge the marketplace of ideas into the marketplace of commodities. I am willing to be persuaded otherwise, but for now, I am happy to keep those two markets separate. And again, what that actually means for trade policy is another discussion.
By the way, I suspect the real libertarian argument here isn't that Canada has too often refused to compete in the marketplace of COMMODITIES (a dirty lie, incidentally, you softwood protectionists!), but that Canada has too often refused to compete in the marketplace of IDEAS (which I believe I addressed in my first post). In that, I do not disagree.
And ChrisO: Canada is indeed extremely lucky to have escaped obliteration after "Snowbird," but you guys owe us big for "2112"!
you guys owe us big for "2112"!
No argument there. Though perhaps the solution for you is to raise taxes even higher to extract yet more of the Yankee dollars earned by Messrs. Lee, Lifeson and Peart... 🙂
Self-Hating Canadians
Yawn. Haven't we beat this to death already?
Neil Peart is my president.
Canadians share two things: 1. A love of hockey, and 2 A love of American culture. Get any two Canadians together and they will talk about those two things. Canadian historian Jack Granatstein (who got his Phd in Canadian history at DUKE)once said "A Canadian is an American who doesn't want to be a U.S, Citizen".
Canadian culture is the stuff that most Canadians don't watch.
I can't understand what goes through the heads of people who invoke culture as if it is some kind of trump card in arguments to abridge liberty. According to them people should be deprived of certain rights or freedoms because upholding such rights or freedoms might go against the culture or might alter the culture. The argue as if customs and ways of doing things are more important than the individuals in a society who may want to live their own life their own way; and who, God forbid, might prefer a way different from a particular custom.
A Canadian is someone who doesn't what to be Brit or American but absorbs US culture 24/7 while trying to deny their responsibilty for that.
A Canadian is also someone who rips off american lefties and then attack Americans for being too right wing.
A Canadian also trashes US politicians only to use the very same politicians as an excuse for Canada having such sorry politicians.
Eric and John B.
Well that explains how both those bands can afford to have so many people in them.
I just now noticed:
Canadian bands = New Pornographers, BSS
US bands = WHite Stripes, Death From Above 1979, Black Keys.
Actually Neko Case was once an Alexandrian. We're quite proud of her here, even if she has joined a collective.
I'm remembering that great skit from the last episode of Kids In THe Hall "Screw You, Taxpayer!"
Oops. I for got about Arcade Fire. There are a bunch of people in that band as well.
Clearly the burden of providing health care coverage has begun to affect the size of our indie-rock bands.
MK: Among Canadian "collective" bands, you forgot Godspeed You Black Emperor, and sorry: Death From Above 1979 is from Toronto!
Boards of Canada, however, are Scottish.
Death From Above 1979 is from Toronto!
Ack! Not only that but I just realized that the Polyphonic Spree completely destroy my whole argument.
I suggest that I read the past year of Pitchfork before I embarass myself further.
Really, this is the most embarassing rock-snob moment I've experienced since my failure to realize that Plastic Bertrand was Belgian, not French.