Powder Blue Persuasion
Over at Ragged Thots, Robert A. George listened unto Dubya's speech the other day and is left wonderin':
Is Congress willing to accept the implications of the paradigm shift George W. Bush is putting on the table?
In addition to "War on Terror I", will George W. Bush want to be responsible for Reconstruction II and War on Poverty II?
Sequels don't often turn out so well.
Whole thing here.
Well, there's always The Godfather Part 2. But yeah.
George also observes:
Appearing in a casual-looking powder-blue (or blue-appearing) shirt -- has a president ever given a prime-time speech to the nation in something other than a normal business suit? -- with New Orleans' Jackson Square emitting a blue-ish hue caused Bush's head to appear disconnected from the sea of blue in the screen.
While it wasn't worn for a prime-time talk per se, Ronnie Reagan (pronounced RAY-gun) once donned an infamous glen plaid suit for a trip to Europe that sets tongues a-wagging. Personally, I think it delivered the message that here was a man who didn't give a shit what Europe thought about anything. Hence, his super-loud suit was a more powerful bargaining tool then publicly musing over the winnability of a limited nuclear war over there. And his penchant for calling his wife "Mommie Poo Pants" continues to make historians' brains hang upside down, discombobulate would-be biographers, and drive home the point here was a guy who meant business.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I think it delivered the message that here was a man who didn't give a shit what Europe thought about anything. Hence, his super-loud suit was a more powerful bargaining tool then publicly musing over the winnability of a limited nuclear war over there. And his penchant for calling his wife "Mommie Poo Pants" continues to make historians' brains hang upside down, discombobulate would-be biographers, and drive home the point here was a guy who meant business
Funny stuff Nick. Still chuckling even after wiping the coffee off the monitor.
Watched a documentary on Reagan in a liberal law school the other day. My audible chuckling to his old one liner "I've just signed legislation to outlaw the Soviet Union...the missles start in 5 minutes" did not go over well. Love him or hate him, the man really had the original BSD.
"BSD"?
What, no link to a picture of President Reagan in the plaid suit?
Big Swinging Dick.
I thought the abbreviation would keep the tone of the comments out of the gutter, but when you're commenting on "Mommie Poo Pants," that's probably an unfounded fear.
Big Swinging Dick.
I thought the abbreviation would keep the tone of the comments out of the gutter, but when you're commenting on "Mommie Poo Pants," that's probably an unfounded fear.
Big Swinging Dick.
I thought the abbreviation would keep the tone of the comments out of the gutter, but when you're commenting on "Mommie Poo Pants," that's probably an unfounded fear.
Jimmy Carter, Malaise, Cardigan? Is any of this ringing a bell?
Terminator II wasn't bad.
"Terminator II wasn't bad."
Doomed from the start. The Terminator in which the terminator learns not to terminate is by defnition bad.
Does anyone give a shit what Europeans thinks?
Sure, some may pretend to when it suits them, but who really cares?
Does The Godfather II count as a sequel? Both one and two are from the same book...
Only the Sicily/Little Italy stuff with DeNiro comes from the book. All the Nevada/1950s-60s stuff is original to TGII, which explains why it's the weakest stuff in the first two movies. If you take out Fredo and the Young Don Corleone material, The Godfather II isn't much better than The Godfather III.
Appearing in a casual-looking powder-blue
I'm remembering a particularly good episode of Yes, Prime Minister now. Something to do with the political implications of theme music, interviewers and suit color.
Come to think of it, I 'm going to go over to Amazon and order the complete collection. THat show was brilliant.
What, no link to a picture of President Reagan in the plaid suit?
No link here either, but I can remember a few suits that Reagan wore as President that looked like he'd swiped them from Dagwood Bumstead's wardrobe rack.
I don't want a war on anything other than the coutry's enemies and think all of this is an exceptionally bad idea. If New Orleans is that valuable of a city, then the private sector will rebuild it with no help from the government. If its not, then we shouldn't be subsidizing an unproductive city located up to ten feet below sea-level in an area prone to hurricanes.
That said, George Bush is like any other politician meaning that his survival instincts outweigh any sort of ideological beliefs he may have. Given that universal truth about politicians, how can anyone be shocked by this response considering that the entire media and political culture including many alleged small government libertarians on this blog have spent the aftermath of the storm shouting "George Bush doesn't care!! He is not doing enough!!" Well, you got it. George Bush officially cares and is doing something and we are going to have another wonderful tax payer funded sinkhole and accompanying bureauocracy to show for it.
It would have been nice if people had stopped, tought about things, realized that disasters sometimes happen and that they are basically a state and local problem before they launched the media led jihad that they did. Let it not be said that government is not responsive to the people. If anything the problem is government is too responsive and goes off half cocked to throw money at problems in the hysterical aftermath of a disaster.
[...]I can remember a few suits that Reagan wore as President that looked like he'd swiped them from Dagwood Bumstead's wardrobe rack.
There's a thought...Dagwood Bumstead for president. If he can hold on to that POA Blondie for 75 years despite being a total loser, he clearly knows something we don't. Plus those big-ass sandwiches would become socially acceptable again.
[...]I can remember a few suits that Reagan wore as President that looked like he'd swiped them from Dagwood Bumstead's wardrobe rack.
There's a thought...Dagwood Bumstead for president. If he can hold on to that POA Blondie for 75 years despite being a total loser, he clearly knows something we don't. Plus those big-ass sandwiches would become socially acceptable again.
[...]I can remember a few suits that Reagan wore as President that looked like he'd swiped them from Dagwood Bumstead's wardrobe rack.
There's a thought...Dagwood Bumstead for president. If he can hold on to that POA Blondie for 75 years despite being a total loser, he clearly knows something we don't. Plus those big-ass sandwiches would become socially acceptable again.
Rocky III.
The Empire Strikes Back.
Wrath of Khan.
Back Door Bettys 4.
Hello?
What about Fat Fuckers 6? It was far superior to the original.
Well John sucks,
You can't very well scream for action because it fits your own personal politcal prejudices and then act shocked when that is exactly what you get. People in general libertarian or not are generally more interested in scoring points and continueing political vendetas than they are in the long term consiquences of what they are advocating. People were too busy smelling blood in the water to recognize or care that what they were really asking for was more federal control, a bigger bureauocracy and a lot of wasted tax dollars. The very things that they claim to be against. Now that have it. Bush cares. Are we all so much the better for it.