Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Mises Wept

Jesse Walker | 8.30.2005 12:39 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

It's not just Hawaii and California: Politicians in Michigan, Oregon, New York, and Connecticut are mulling price controls for gasoline too. Apparently, no economic lesson is so forceful and decisive that it doesn't need to be learned again.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: It Ain't a '70s Revival Without Gas Lines!

Jesse Walker is books editor at Reason and the author of Rebels on the Air and The United States of Paranoia.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (34)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. MikeP   20 years ago

    Many economists warn that prices caps and regulations could actually send gas prices higher.

    They misspelled All but the most insane.

  2. Julian Sanchez   20 years ago

    OK, how long have you been waiting to use that headline?

  3. Windypundit   20 years ago

    Here in Chicago, we have gas prices a lot higher than those pussies in Hawaii are whining about. It’s been over $3/gallon for a while now due to a combination of taxes and the fact that we’re in a very small market because of special additive requirements. We can’t handle demand surges by bringing fuel in from other areas, so our prices are way up.

  4. crimethink   20 years ago

    In NY State, it’s also illegal to sell gas below wholesale, so Sam’s Club, BJ’s, and other stations that are willing to lower their gas price to attract business can’t. Rather than adopting price controls, if the legislature wanted to offer relief they could repeal that stupid “predatory pricing” law.

  5. ed   20 years ago

    I’m rather surprised it’s taken this long.
    I can hardly wait for the return of the 55 MPH speed limit. Don’t laugh: we still have carpool lanes.

  6. Jennifer   20 years ago

    Connecticut better not try this. I have a long enough commute to work each way without having to add an extra half-hour or longer to wait for my turn to buy gas.

  7. Jesse Walker   20 years ago

    OK, how long have you been waiting to use that headline?

    I was still working for Liberty when I thought it up, so it’s been about a decade.

  8. Anonymous Coward   20 years ago

    So. . . explain to this AC, is this a big game of chicken with the oil producers?

    If every state mandated price controls, once the current inventory runs out, the retailers (who don’t want to take a loss) can’t afford to buy the oil from the refiners, (who don’t want to take a loss) who can’t afford to buy from the oil producers, who can’t afford not to sell it. Eventually. Is it a matter of who can hold out longer?

    Then again, if it worked that way, we already should’ve tried it.

  9. Chuck   20 years ago

    This is going to be the most awesome case study for federalism ever. Watching New Yorkers drive to the Garden State to get sweet, tasty petrol is going to make the planners’ heads explode.

  10. MikeP   20 years ago

    Eventually. Is it a matter of who can hold out longer?

    If states do go through with this, at least it will lower the price of gas in China.

  11. nobody   20 years ago

    It’s funny; when I first learned Economics, I was shocked. I thought to myself, “Somebody ought to share this information with the politicians!!” I’ve since learned the truth is even worse – I guarantee that these politicians know *exactly* what will happen as a consequence of price controls, but know Doing Something will look better for them, and they can blame subsequent lines at the pump and shortages on Greedy Gas Companies.

  12. Timothy   20 years ago

    Nobody hit it right on the head.

    I’ve long since stopped thinking politicians were just stupid, I’m pretty sure it’s a delicate balance of selective ignorance and downright evil.

  13. wellfellow   20 years ago

    Oh, this is just the sort of thing Michigan needs right now.

  14. Ron Hardin   20 years ago

    These things are aimed at soap-opera news consumers, which is the only way to get your sound bite on the air. The media won’t air it if it doesn’t please soap opera women, their target audience.

    Ridicule of the audience is the right course, but I don’t see how to get it on the air.

    High prices are the solution, not the problem.

    The demand for gas is called, technically, “inelastic.” This means you need it and will buy it no matter what the price.

    Well not quite. It means that the price has to go up _a whole lot_ to get you to cut back.

    So go up a whole lot is what it does.

    Accompanying this is screaming and yelling and complaining. This is a mark of success!!

    It means you cut back.

    The market works.

    The inventory at the tank farm is no longer falling.

    There are no lines for gas.

  15. Col DuBois   20 years ago

    This is almost as bad as when one of my house guests took a dump on my ironing board.

  16. Captain Awesome   20 years ago

    Everybody keep a record of how much longer you have to spend at the pump. I plan to start a class action against the politicaians in CA for the lost productivity for my time. Who’s in?

  17. sovereign immunity   20 years ago

    Good luck with that.

  18. Captain Awesome   20 years ago

    I know, I know. But it seems like intensional malice. They know their going to hurt us and they do it anyway.

  19. Lost_In_Translation   20 years ago

    Well they’ve already got rent control in NYC, might as well create shortages of fuel too, maybe then nobody will ever leave their apartments again.

  20. Isaac Bartram   20 years ago

    Actually, Captain, I don’t think they are deliberately trying to do harm.

    To the extent that they admit that previous interventions have failed it is always because “the wrong people were in charge” or “it was inadequately funded” or some such variant on “if you would only give us unlimited power we would make everything go right.”

  21. nobody   20 years ago

    Issac Bartram,

    I’d normally agree w/ you a bit, that politicians aren’t necessarily sure that their policies will backfire, but in the case of price controls, I’ll disagree. The reason price controls are always used by economists as examples of bad policy is that *correctly implemented* they’re problematic. The failure of price controls is not related to a poor implementation; it’s their nature.

    –Nobody

  22. drooling richard   20 years ago

    I have invented an automobile that will run by burning the hydocarbons of legistlators. The exhaust fumes are a bit foul at present, but I will work on that.

  23. Isaac Bartram   20 years ago

    I have invented an automobile that will run by burning the hydocarbons of legistlators.

    Hmmm, you might be onto something. Not the car, but what if we could capture the waste heat produced by solons as they bloviate in their chambers.

    I mean, 50 states means 99 legislative chambers (NE being unicameral and all) plus the federal House and Senate. That’s a lot of hot air, man. Think about it.

  24. Rick Barton   20 years ago

    OK, how long have you been waiting to use that headline?

    Unless I’m missing something, it seems that with all the harmful meddling that government has committed against voluntary human action, Jesse has had a depressing abundance of opportunities.

  25. Ruthless   20 years ago

    “Mises Wept” shows your people are my people, Jesse: bible-thumpin’ hillbillies.

    My father gives a longer version of the little boy in Sunday School giving an answer to the teacher: “Jesus wept. Moses crept, and Jonah?, something with a bullfrog.”
    If you have heard that one, we are cousins fer sure.

    With regard to the actual topic at hand, recall when newspapers used fillers? They were like Fleers Double-Bubble fun facts to know.
    Well, instead of fillers, today we have periodic scrums with the energy industry. Those and polls.
    Fun facts to know were so much more ethically and intellectually pure.
    Ah, the good old days.

  26. js   20 years ago

    I no longer have to regret not have lived through the Nixon administration. Unwinable ill advised war … lines at the pump … heck even a “Republican” in the white house … I’m just kicking back and waiting for the double digit inflation.

  27. Ruthless   20 years ago

    js,
    I wouldn’t have bought a used car from Nixon, but Carter was your man for lines at the pump.

  28. Rick Barton   20 years ago

    Ruthless beat me to the chronology point…by about 13 minuets.

  29. Rick Barton   20 years ago

    Hey, I just detailed the chronology of Ruthless’ and my chronological point…

    Should I post this? Should I…should I…

  30. Twba   20 years ago

    Ruthless,

    I remember gas lines with Carter, but unless all those left handed cigarettes destroyed my memory, there were gas lines in 1973. Nixon’s price controls combined with the Israel-hating petro-arabs’ temper tantrums caused gas lines.

  31. Jesse Walker   20 years ago

    “Mises Wept” shows your people are my people, Jesse: bible-thumpin’ hillbillies.

    My father gives a longer version of the little boy in Sunday School giving an answer to the teacher: “Jesus wept. Moses crept, and Jonah?, something with a bullfrog.” If you have heard that one, we are cousins fer sure.

    That’s the first time I’ve heard it, so I guess our bloodlines haven’t crossed. I must have read my Bible without any hillbillies thumping around nearby.

  32. Jennifer   20 years ago

    I buy gas at the same station every morning on my way to work; today was twelve cents a gallon more than yesterday morning. The Exxon next door to that station upped its prices by forty cents a gallon. I’ve read that, thanks to Katrina, we may be paying four bucks a gallon soon, and that won’t go down until the whole pipeline-and-refinery infrastructure down there is repaired. Who knows when that will be?

    But I’d still rather have access to all the four-dollar gas I want, rather than be limited in the amount of two-dollar gas I can buy.

  33. Don   20 years ago

    This is a little late for the “peak oil” threads (so I’ll put this comment here), but in those threads Jennifer made a point about the scientific predictability of oil fields. I just started a book on petroleoum geology, and one of the first chapters made the point that quite a few oil companies have been very successfful without geologists on the payroll, and one successful Texas oil tycoon pointed out that all geologists did for his competition was drive up the cost per barrel of oil. It seems that there is, in fact, a good argument for random drilling (as opposed to science determining the drilling site).

  34. whocares   20 years ago

    my new propulsion design is powered entirely by Hot Air…….so, fill your self up with BS and start blowing.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

As American as Due Process

Billy Binion | From the July 2025 issue

How Tariffs Are Breaking the Manufacturing Industries Trump Says He Wants To Protect

Eric Boehm | From the July 2025 issue

The Latest Escalation Between Russia and Ukraine Isn't Changing the Course of the War

Matthew Petti | 6.6.2025 4:28 PM

Marsha Blackburn Wants Secret Police

C.J. Ciaramella | 6.6.2025 3:55 PM

This Small Business Is in Limbo As Owner Sues To Stop Trump's Tariffs

Eric Boehm | 6.6.2025 3:30 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!