Sweet Success
An EU commission appears to be serious about slashing sugar subsidies.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Even better would be allowing sugar producers here to set their own prices. But ADM will have none of that.
Look, we need to keep sugar expensive FOR THE CHILDREN, otherwise they might eat too much of it and get fat.
And we need to keep corn-based sweeteners subsidized and artificially cheap FOR THE CHILDREN, to help keep the grocery bills low for working parents.
There's something funny about a world where some people want to subsidize sugar to keep it cheap while other want to tax foods with sugar to make them more expensive....
So rather than let the market decide, lets take money from people who use sugar and give it to the people who make sugar via the government, rather than let them do it themselves.
The strong must protect the sweet ... the sweet...
In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women.
Dammit. Mo beat me to it.