Friday Fun Link, Several Months Late
Last summer, the Australian literary journal Meanjin published "The Secret History of the Flying Carpet," a brilliant Borgesian hoax by Azhar Abidi. Written in the form of a serious scholarly essay, the story presented a poker-faced argument that flying carpets really did exist and were an important technology in the medieval Middle East -- until they were destroyed by the local establishment:
Flying carpets were discouraged in the Islamic lands for two reasons. The official line was that man was never intended to fly, and the flying carpet was a sacrilege to the order of things, an argument that was spread enthusiastically by a zealous clergy. The second reason was economic. For the establishment, it was necessary to keep the horse and the camel as the standard means of transport. The reason was that certain Arab families, who had access to the inner chambers of successive rulers, had become rich because of their vast stud farms, where they bred hundreds of thousands of horses each year for the army, merchants and the proletariat. It was the same with camels. Certain Egyptian king-makers (listed by Ben Sherira as the Hatimis, the Zahidis and the progeny of Abu Hanifa II) owned camel farms, and enjoyed a total monopoly on the supply of camels in the whole of the Islamic empire. None of these old families wanted their privileges usurped by a small group of poor artisans who could potentially wreck their markets by making flying carpets popular. Thus they were undermined.
Thanks to the mullahs' propaganda, the Muslim middle class was beginning to shun flying carpets by the mid-eighth century….
The results were predictable: Many people really believed the story, which was soon reprinted as fact on at least two Iranian websites. And Abidi got a contract to write a novel.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Did they run on water?
No wonder the Arab world is pissed off...The West leaves them in the dust and then rubs their noses in it.
Yet another example of politicians in the pocket of Big Camel!
Sigh. Another myth shattered. Put this one next to Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny and God.
You can fool some of the people all of the time. I intend to concentrate on those people.
-- George W. Bush
Don't worry, I know a guy who knows a guy in Cairo that makes unlicensed flying carpets. If you are interested, please deposit $10,000 into an account that I will designate.
Eryk Boston at January 28, 2005 12:44 PM
You can fool some of the people all of the time. I intend to concentrate on those people.
-- George W. Bush
i don't know if W actually said that, but it sounds like something he would say.
i'll be plagiarizing that for future reference.
And by God, Detroit has the technology to manufacture a car that runs on good intentions, but the oil industry is keeping them underfoot!
This just shows how backwards their societies are and why the US must prevail in the war on Islam
The West leaves them in the dust and then rubs their noses in it.
It being?
😉
I think the flying carpet verus horses/camelback bit should replace the lightbulb vs. candlemakers example in illustrating the whole progress "tok' r' jrbs'" fallacy your learn about in econ 101. Much more vivid.
Another problem was that the engineers designing the flying carpet naturally tried to make them more efficient and faster, resulting in people falling off, and the whole flying carpet business went down in a morass of tort suits.
Another problem was that the engineers designing the flying carpet naturally tried to make them more efficient and faster, resulting in people falling off, and the whole flying carpet business went down in a morass of tort suits.
See? Innovation DOES cause ever-increasing mass misery! First the injuries, then the tort-suits, then the downfall from the top of culture, and now terrorism. WILL IT EVER STOP!?!?
What people really hated were the giant 10' x 30' sport utility carpets (SUCs) that blocked out the sun.