Blogging for the NSC
Another interesting recommendation from that Defense Science Board report to the DoD: "We recommend that the president work with Congress to create legislation and funding for an independent, nonprofit, and nonpartisan center for strategic communication to support the National Security Council." The so-called Center for Strategic Communication would need about $100-150 million a year, to do stuff like pay weblogs for disseminating America-friendly messages to countries "ripe and important" -- the report's vivid phrase for places "where the risk of U.S. intervention is high." In bureaucratic jibber-jabber:
Subcontracting to the commercial and academic sectors for a range of products and programs that communicate strategic themes and messages to appropriate target audiences. Broad themes and messages would include respect for human dignity and individual rights; for individual education and economic opportunity; and for personal freedom, safety, and mobility. Examples of products would be a children's TV series (Arabic Sesame Street); video and interactive games; support for the distribution and production of selected foreign films; and Web communications including blogs, chat rooms, and electronic journals.
It should be pointed out that "a number of senior administration officials took part in the study as integral participants, officials from not only the Department of Defense but also the Department of State, Department of Homeland Security, Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the intelligence community."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Broad themes and messages would include respect for human dignity and individual rights; for individual education and economic opportunity; and for personal freedom, safety, and mobility.
They're getting to damned smart. What they really mean is give us the power. Which is, of course, antithetical to personal freedom and safety.
How many viewers of these messages would spot this? Before it's too late, that is.
Broad themes and messages would include respect for human dignity and individual rights.
Actions. Words. Louder.
As long as those themes and messages are just clever marketing and not things that we, you know, actually have to live up to or anything.
where the risk of U.S. intervention is high.from my opinion,the job of National Security Council is too mysterious.