Family Plot

|

Israel?s Ha?aretz is reporting that ?Munzar Assad, a cousin of Syrian President Bashar Assad, is under house arrest in Syria on suspicion he was aiding militias loyal to deposed Iraqi President Saddam Hussein and supplying them with arms.? The source for the story is reportedly Syrian intelligence, according to a Syrian exile group called the National Council for Truth, Justice and Reconciliation in Syria.

The group issued a report noting, also: ?Munzar Assad was detained by the security services of an unnamed European country [before being handed over to the Syrians]. The report states the arrest was made in an effort to prevent American intelligence agents, cooperating with agents of a coalition partner, from detaining Munzar Assad.?

It is fairly certain that the Syrian intelligence services did not arrest Munzar in order to end the smuggling of arms or anything else to Iraq. Indeed, according to Syrian sources, the shootout that occurred in Damascus last April, and which was falsely blamed on Islamic militants, was, in fact, an exchange of fire between a group of smugglers reportedly tied to Military Intelligence, and a group from a rival intelligence service, the Political Security directorate, that was shadowing them. The smugglers, among many deeds, reportedly ran guns to Iraq.

By most accounts, Bashar?s control over the various centers of power in Syria is very weak, so that it?s unlikely that he would further erode this by going after a cousin. Nor would Syria's intelligence services hit on an Assad family member. The "house arrest" claim seems partly or entirely bogus.

The real question was which European intelligence service arrested Munzar, evidently to shield him? I have my doubts?if indeed the exiles? account is accurate.

Most interesting was the exiles' claim that "the events surrounding the Munzar Assad case were the reason that the Syrian president cut short a recent trip to China." I know people who were on that trip, and the rumor among the delegation was that a coup attempt, or something similar, had taken place. That never seemed plausible, but I'm not sure this story is either.

NEXT: I Feel Some Glaucoma Coming On...

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. thoreau

    I don’t think it would be wise for the US to invade a nation on the “front-lines” with Israel, or a nation that contains Mecca and Medina…so I suppose that leaves Iran, where we actually might get the flowers-on-the-tanks reception.

    Still boosting pat Paulsen for President? Anybody but a Republican, as the neighbors disapprove?

    I miss the lines between the comments, but like to see the feature article. Wonder if they relieved the double-post problem?

  2. “that leaves Iran, where we actually might get the flowers-on-the-tanks reception”

    Yeah, just like 1979.

  3. I assume that the Iranians will solve the problem on their own in the next 5 to 10 years.

  4. Thoreau, invading Syria won’t change the look of the comments:)

  5. Thoreau, invading Syria won’t change the look of the comments:)

    I beg to differ! I’ve been assured by the CIA that Syria’s leaders have software of font destruction, and may have already used it. And we all know that the CIA doesn’t make mistakes!

    This is a matter of taking the fight to the enemy before the smoking gun comes in the form of Wingdings fonts all over the page! 🙂

  6. In Syria some years back, I remember stories of these kinds of shootouts in Daddy Assad’s time, generally internal rivalries over control of something or other.

  7. I’m not sure I understand the story, but I have a feeling that this is more imprtant than it seems.

  8. I don’t like the new look of the comments. Then again, maybe I’ll get used to it.

    Anybody consider this grounds for invading Syria? Come on, I know one of you must! 🙂

  9. Celebrex Lawsuit Monday 27 December 2004 10:55:52
    Celebrex side effects Monday 27 December 2004 10:55:52
    Celebrex death Monday 27 December 2004 10:55:52
    Celebrex danger Monday 27 December 2004 10:55:52
    Celebrex class-action lawsuit and Monday 27 December 2004 10:55:52 of course
    Celebrex attorney and Monday 27 December 2004 10:55:52 of course
    Celebrex lawyer Monday 27 December 2004 10:55:52
    Celebrex stroke and Monday 27 December 2004 10:55:52
    Celebrex recall Monday 27 December 2004 10:55:52
    Celebrex heart attack

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.