Shafer Defeats Miller
In the wake of Ahmad Chalabi's public dismissal, The New York Times is running today a self-criticism [free reg. req.] of its own string of stories that relied on inaccurate information from Iraqi defectors and their Pentagon handlers. (There may be some Jesuitical line of argument that will paradoxically cite this editorial history as evidence of the mainstream media's anti-Bush and antiwar bias, and I presume some ambitious blogger is even now crafting his brief.)
In its list of relevant stories [free reg. req.], the Times includes both original stories and followup corrections. By my count there are about 15 articles in the Gullible category, and of those, fully 10 were penned by fallen star Judith Miller. This provides a final vindication for Jack Shafer, who has been dogging Miller like Inspector Javert for nigh on a year now, and Shafer is not shy about taking a bow.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
maybe all this blair stuff will turn into something positive for ye old gray one after all.
see the above URL for a reasoned dissection of the Times mea culpa
doh, I mean my eponymously labeled url
Thanks a fucking lot.
There were thousands, of folks screaming their heads off that Judith Miller's sources were bullshit and yet the Times stuck to her. Newspapers around the country parroted her crap, polls soared supporting the invasion and now here we are.
Thanks a fucking lot.
I second that emotion. 5 digits of dead people.
Maybe "screaming their heads off" isn't the best methodology for military and political analysis?
Your "emotion" is noted.
Maybe its all that's left to you when the government and media are working together to shut off alternative voices.
I can't hear you.