Culture and Commerce
If a university really wants to advance "intellectual diversity," a good first step would be to require its economics students to study some anthropology and its anthropology students to study some economics. Worst-case scenario: you'll expand some worldviews. Best-case scenario: you'll get more scholars like Grant McCracken.
[Via Virginia Postrel.]
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
It's amazing what taking one free-market oriented microeconomics class can accomplish. I wish more (any?) universities would require it.
NCDan's experiences with anthropology match my own. Egad, let's get the sociologists to study economics. Their heads might explode.
Hmm..you say anthropologists don't study economics. It seems I've read several marxist interpretations of culture in American Anthropologist over the years..although I'll admit I haven't cracked an issue of American Anthropologist in at least 5 years. Maybe they're over it.