Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Do It Better, But Don't Do Anything Different!

Julian Sanchez | 4.23.2004 12:01 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

A study of aviation security practices [PDF] by the General Accounting Office finds that—surprise, surprise—you don't realize many benefits from private contracting when a thicket of regulations requires the private firms to do things exactly like the feds.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: "Sick of Seeing It"? Ban it!

Julian Sanchez is a contributing editor at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (6)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Larry   21 years ago

    The primary function of any bureaucracy is to perpetuate its own existence. I predict that the TSA will do anything and everything in its power to force private firms out of the "security screening" business. Burdensome regulations and oversight is just one tactic.

  2. Dictator For Hire   21 years ago

    "competition" for grants from the public dole isn't really what "free minds and free markets" is all about.

  3. TWC   21 years ago

    A point Bob Poole has been making for many years.

    Glad to see the GAO listening to Reason for a change. Pun intended (groan)

  4. thoreau   21 years ago

    This was my experience the one summer I worked at a Department of Energy lab run by a contractor. It wasn't like individual projects were contracted out on a competitive basis, the way university research grants are (say what you will about the many problems in academia, but lack of competition is not one of them). Instead, a huge facility was run by a contractor in a symbiotic relationship that seemed to create twice as many bureaucrats (one layer for DOE, another for the contractor). And since the transaction costs of switching contractors would be huge there was no credible threat of losing business that might inspire efficiency.

    Contracting can yield benefits when it's done on a per-project basis with competitive bidding, low transaction costs for switching contractors, and a credible threat to terminate the contract as punishment for poor performance. But if contracting simply means that everybody gets different name tags and twice as many paper-pushers are involved, contracting may actually be worse than simply having the gov't do it outright.

  5. thoreau   21 years ago

    I should clarify on academia: Yes, there is a lack of competition in K-12. But at the college and university level things are very competitive. Witness the way public and private schools woo students, and the way that research groups compete for grants (both public and private). There are many, many problems, but lack of competition isn't one of them.

  6. Rick Barton   21 years ago

    What "Dictator For Hire" said.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Florida Applies for Federal Reimbursement for 'Alligator Alcatraz' Costs Despite Court Warning

C.J. Ciaramella | 9.13.2025 7:00 AM

This Protein Powder Is Made Out of Air and Uses 600 Times Less Water Than Beef

Jeff Luse | From the October 2025 issue

FBI Blunders and Internet Panic: How the Search for Charlie Kirk's Killer Went Off the Rails

Matthew Petti | 9.12.2025 5:14 PM

The Standard for 'Vicious' Speech Trump Laid Out After Kirk's Murder Would Implicate Trump Himself

Jacob Sullum | 9.12.2025 3:45 PM

U.S. Plan To Disarm Hezbollah Is a Diplomatic Dead End

Lora Karch | 9.12.2025 3:31 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300