Magic Kingdom
Remember the infamous Saudi textbooks? Not long ago, Khalid al-Awwad, the undersecretary of the kingdom?s Education Ministry, said Saudi Arabia was revising its school curriculum to stress ?peace and tolerance.? A conference was even held recently to critically address the issue of "militancy."
Now, 150 angry people, including judges and university professors, are fighting back. In a signed statement, they warned:
"Any omissions or mutilation of what was written by the Islamic scholars… contradicts the national unity the state is calling for, as this unity is based on our religious creed…"
One of the signatories is Sheikh Nasser al-Omar. If you can read Arabic and want an insight into how some Saudi clerics use Internet, you might want to visit him here. (Thanks to Michael Scott Doran for both links. Incidentally, he's just written "The Saudi Paradox" for Foreign Affairs that provides a background for all this).
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
That's like asking "Who cares what 19 people think?"
Do you like Doran's article? I read it and at first thought it enlightening.
On further reflection, I have my doubts. Doran portrays Nayaf and and the crown prince and a bad guy and a good guy. That may in fact be the case, but reality is rarely so simplisitic. If a Euro paper wrote and article describing Rumsfeld as a bad guy and Powell as a good guy, we'd all know that the article was eliminating all nunaces and delivering a misleading picutre.
So what's your take on Doran's articel. Is it any good?
Ikram
Sorta had the same impression. Less impressed after a while. Sort of like the old Kremlinology-- picking Good Communists-- Gorby was the best.
If the Hitler regime had lasted we would have been handi-capping Nazis-- Doenitz, Speer...maybe Hess or Goering? I don't pick my favorite Chinese Communist...nobody even tries with Cuba.
But remember when Tariq Asiz was everyone's favorite Baathist? He will swing beside Saddam and Chemical Ali.
Sometimes I really hate these medieval assholes.
150??? Who cares what 150 people think?
Waittaminute here... you mean the Saudi's aren't our allies? 😉