Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Rocket Ahead

Jeff Taylor | 12.18.2003 5:06 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

On the 100th anniversary of the first flight by Wright brothers, Burt Rutan's Scaled Composites became the first private company to send up a piloted rocket at supersonic speeds.

And unlike the ancient space shuttle, the SS1 is fully reusable -- hint hint.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: The LP's Battle of the Boortz

Jeff Taylor is a contributing editor at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (5)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Andrew Lynch   22 years ago

    This is exciting news. I had never even heard of the X-Prize Foundation. It's encouraging to see that there's a competitive marketplace for deep, practical space-flight R&D. Anything to let the air out of the gasbag known as NASA. Hint, hint, indeed.

  2. TM Lutas   22 years ago

    The current X-Prize vehicles are being designed for suborbital flight. If there is an actual market for that sort of thing that will allow for boot strapping, it's likely that whoever wins (as well as some of the runners up) will fight over that market and capitalize sufficiently to get to the next level. If not, it's more than likely that a new prize with a higher goal of LEO would be set. The space shuttle may be ancient but it will do more than the X-Prize winner. I wish all the best to the contestants but it is unrealistic to think that their current generation vehicles will be serious contenders for replacing the shuttle.

  3. Warren   22 years ago

    TM,
    That's not the point. The X-prize is just the new Orteig prize. Single engine planes didn't put ocean liners out of business either. But it was a milestone. Just as this is a milestone, and a mighty big one too IMHO.

    The X-prize claimed within a year? I had no idea we were this close, WHOO HOO!

  4. Gary McGath   22 years ago

    Doing it on the 100th anniversary of an earlier audacious but successful private experiment in powered flight was a wonderful touch.

  5. StMack   22 years ago

    Mark Oakley at Rocket Man Blog has an excellent series of posts detailing individual entries in the X-Prize competition. He interviewed a number of the participants, and he knows of what he speaks.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

In 16 Years, the V.A. Turned This $450 Million Hospital Project Into a $1.6 Billion Boondoggle

Jacob R. Swartz | 9.15.2025 4:45 PM

Charlie Kirk Would Not Have Wanted This

Robby Soave | 9.15.2025 4:18 PM

Environmental Groups Are Suing To Silence Scientists Who Wrote a Report Questioning Climate Change Alarmism

Jeff Luse | 9.15.2025 3:51 PM

Social Media Didn't Kill Charlie Kirk

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 9.15.2025 12:15 PM

Gamer Radicalism

Liz Wolfe | 9.15.2025 9:32 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300