Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Onward and Upward with Space Tourism

Brian Doherty | 12.17.2003 1:39 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Two more rich civilians have inked a deal to fly to the space station on a rocket from Russia, via the Virginia-based company Space Adventures. It still costs $20 million, but the budget-conscious should remember that complimentary meals are included in that price.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Do Your Homework, Go To Jail

Brian Doherty is a senior editor at Reason and author of Ron Paul's Revolution: The Man and the Movement He Inspired (Broadside Books).

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (15)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Warren   22 years ago

    It's not just the 20 extra large, passengers have to accept the risks of handing their lives over to the cash-strapped, failure-prone, Russian space program. Oddly enough, the same bureaucratic forces have corrupted the US space program, with similar high-risk acceptance consequences, despite far greater budgets.

    The commercial market is of course where the space program, including adventure tourism, belongs. Still, in spite of the elegant simplicity of astrophysics, it's remains a costly proposition to lift 100 kilograms a 100 kilometers off the ground. (With every additional kilogram driving the cost increasingly higher). Robust and reliable life support also comes at a price. There would need to be quite a lot of folks willing to shell out $20M a pop to make it an attractive entrepreneurial investment. Perhaps they could offer frequent flyer miles to lure customers.

  2. Space Joker   22 years ago

    I hear the tube of Salmon Wellington is well worth the cost of the trip.

  3. StMack   22 years ago

    $20 Million. What's the in-flight movie?

  4. space cowboy   22 years ago

    Only in an extremely robust, reason-based world-wide free-market economy can private space tourism become a reality. That's a lot of compound modifiers to overcome. It will remain a fantasy so long as people think Marxism "looks good on paper" and Americans are afraid of free trade with Canada.

  5. Warren   22 years ago

    good point

  6. Mark A.   22 years ago

    Tsk, tsk. It needn't be so expensive, folks. Have a look:

    http://www.space.com/businesstechnology/technology/space_elevator_020327-1.html

  7. Jean Bart   22 years ago

    Warren,

    Space flight involving humans would remain risky whether it was government mandated or not. Where it is not risky is the launching of sattelites; the only profitable wing of space flight - that is low to medium orbit launches of commercial sattelites.

  8. StMack   22 years ago

    GO HERE.

    http://www.rocketmanblog.com/

    I would reference specific relavent posts but they are too many. Go, read them all, and learn.

  9. StMack   22 years ago

    Sorry, I scewed up the link.

    GO HERE

    that preview button is cool!

  10. space cowboy   22 years ago

    I still think it's pie in the sky. Or is that spam in the sky?

  11. Kirsten Tynan   22 years ago

    It always drives me nuts to see the government-dependent space tourism story trump the privately-funded space tourism- particularly in libertarian media. Here's the real story of the day:

    SpaceShipOne Breaks the Sound Barrier
    http://www.scaled.com/projects/tierone/index.htm

    Kirsten

  12. Jon H   22 years ago

    $20 million would buy a lot of Tang.

  13. Andy D.   22 years ago

    The US space pen vs. Russian pencil is an ubran legend. See Snopes:

    http://www.snopes.com/business/genius/spacepen.asp

    "$20 million would buy a lot of Tang."

    That's some funny shit.

  14. not Weishaupt   22 years ago

    Damn, I hate getting fooled by something like that. Still, a friend of mine was present at Baikonur several years ago to witness a space launch. I think it might have been the first one that carried an American astronaut on board. He came away very impressed, not only by how much they accomplish on a shoestring, but by how much is just left to rot. Remnants of their N-1 program, for example, are left in what amounts to a junkyard.

  15. not Weishaupt   22 years ago

    The Russian space program may be cash poor, but it is technologically sound. They do not believe in replacement of technology for it's own sake, but that can be an advantage. After all, NASA spent tens of thousands of dollars developing a pen, with a gel-type ink, that would function in a zero 'g' environment. The Russians just used pencils.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

The Fourth of July Is a Celebration of Freedom—From Government

John Stossel | 7.4.2025 12:01 AM

A Broad Ruling Against Trump's Immigration Policies Illustrates Alternatives to Universal Injunctions

Jacob Sullum | 7.3.2025 4:40 PM

Environmental Regulations Are Literally Baking Europeans to Death

Jack Nicastro | 7.3.2025 3:38 PM

Federal Prison Guards Allegedly Beat an Inmate to a Pulp. The Supreme Court Says He Can't Sue.

Billy Binion | 7.3.2025 2:48 PM

Jurassic World Rebirth Chases Summer Movie Nostalgia

Peter Suderman | 7.3.2025 1:40 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!