Sync Studies
The Cornell Daily Sun profiles Prof. Steven Strogatz, whose most recent book popularizes the science of spontaneous order.
[Via Ender's Review.]
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Reads more like philosophy than science. There might be something to it, but you couldn't tell from that article.
Yeah, that's a problem with college papers. If you Google him, you'll find some more substantive stuff -- but nothing as recent as the Cornell piece.
I taught a dynamical systems course several years ago, using the first (I think) textbook he wrote. It was one of the best-written textbooks I have ever used in 20 years of university teaching, and if this new book is half as engaging and lucid as that one was, it should easily be a best seller.
I have the feeling that, like quantum mechanics, this is a field that doesn't popularize well.
I remember reading Gleick's Chaos and coming away with all sorts of romantic notions that were dashed in about the first week of a non-linear dynamics class I took in college.
I don't really follow the connections between fractional dimensionality, complexity theory, self organization, and so on.
I remember understanding Gleick's "Chaos" better and understanding a more quantitative treatment of it as well after I got the Gleick's Chaos software.
"we are now living through the birth of a subject that is bigger than physics because it includes physics."
That does sound pretty intriguing but I still haven't figured out how correct Wolfram is.
If you want to check out Strogatz's writing in SYNC, you can read an excerpt of the first chapter -- it's on Popular Science's website
http://www.popsci.com/popsci/books/article/0,12543,430254-1-excerpt,00.html
and you can also read a review of the book there:
http://www.popsci.com/popsci/books/article/0,12543,430254-1,00.html