"Absorptive Capacity" Revisited
The head of the U.N. Environment Program hopes China can be stopped from becoming a first-world country.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
That's scary. Not that the Chinese will single-handedly run the world out of resourses, but that small minded hand wringers want to grab the "mother of invention" by the throat and choke off future innovation that will allow any third world country to prosper. Seems short sighted. I say let the "invisible hand" loose and watch it do its magic.
Too bad Julian Simon isn't still alive. He could place a bet and make some more money.
this idea makes a lot of sense, considering that the use of resources wouldn't at all be constrained by supply and demand
The cost of using resources is indeed responsive to supply and demand. Unfortunately, the cost of polluting is not. Until the environmental cost of economic activity is captured in the product/service price, there will be a tragedy of the commons.
^your right, but i would point out the established fact that first world countries don't pollute as much as thrid world ones, so by the very nature of chinas transformation to a first world country, this dilemma will become less problematic.
More alarmism from the head-in-the-sand crowd.
"It's not a question whether you are devoted to nature or whether this is an emotional topic. This is the rationality of economics,"...
Huh? Is he being serious? I want Julian back.
I am awed by the level of economic expertise at the UN.
This prediction sounds similar to the prediction made in 1860s Dubklin that if the rate of horse use continued that the entire city would be covered with six feet of manure by the 1950s
On Saturday 28 August 2004 02:25:45 Medical equipment http://medical-equipment.order.gb.com post was powered by Golf vacations http://golf-vacations.order.gb.com Saturday 28 August 2004 02:25:45 and Digital Cameras http://digital-cameras.order.gb.com and also DVD Player http://dvd-player.order.gb.com and of course beautiful Flowers http://flowers.order.gb.com and don't forget Mobile Phones http://mobile-phones.order.gb.com