The Switch is On
Sprint goes green with its packet-switched network for local phone traffic, the first carrier to try such a thing. Though the upgrade will take years, the move to more efficient, Net-like packet transmission is a step towards burying the cramped, messy circuit-switched network and its 19th century roots.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
For years I've been an investor in Voice-over IP, sending voice over internet packets, much as we send data. Since the speed of sound is so much slower that the speed of light, a fast enough electronic technology should allow the packets of speech to be broken up, sent at the speed of light, reassembled, and delivered at a speed that still exceeds the speed of sound. The listener should not notice.
What does this mean for telephony? I use Sprint for my DSL connection. I also use Sprint for my local phone service. This should lead to unlimited long distance being bundled with the DSL connection, and the ISP charging flat rate long distance. It doesn't look good for AT&T.
Doesn't this conversion seem too slow? Won't packet-based networks become dominant somewhat sooner?
What makes this "green"?
Traffic light -- as in "local phone TRAFFIC." Red light, green light. Get it? (Duh.)