War Advisors
Reports today's Washington Post (without naming names):
[T]here is a behind-the-scenes effort by former senior Republican government officials and party leaders to convince President Bush that the advice he has received from Vice President Cheney, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and Deputy Defense Secretary Paul D. Wolfowitz -- a powerful triumvirate frequently at odds with Secretary of State Colin L. Powell -- has been wrong and even dangerous to long-term U.S. national interests…
"The only one who can reach the president is his father," one former senior official said. "But it is not timely yet to talk to him."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Dubya's a wimp - after all, he didn't bother to show up for his whole Reserve obligation. (What a patriot). He is, undeniably a wimp.
But when it's other people's lives at stake, he's got all the balls in the world.
man this is increasingly becoming like a crappy star wars episode.
Hey - stop picking on star wars.
Anyone who takes his case to the WaPo is not exactly looking out for the President whatever the situation. Pretty standard method of Washington not-beanbag I'd say.
These are the same guys that brought us Gulf War I with disastrous results. Bush 1 was a wimp and his son is not. Enough said.
Trying not to be a wimp also has its potential negative consequences.
These comments suck. But I came here not to make that comment, but to say this about the quoted piece: Who are these unnamed sources? "One former senior official"? "Behind the scenes effort" "former Senior Republican government officials" unnamed "party leaders." Sounds like a bunch of horse shit to me. I think either these sources are made up by WaPo, or should be disregarded b/c they're too chickenshit to put their name to their quote.
This isn't a new story.
http://www.interglobal.org/weblog/archives/002313.html#002313
Thanks