Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Mysterious Blobs

Jacob Sullum | 3.21.2003 12:40 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Last night CNN featured lots of green infrared footage with darkish blobs that the correspondent identified as tanks or trucks or personnel carriers. You pretty much had to take his word for it, and I began to suspect that CNN was running the same loop over and over again. Is this the main benefit of embeddedness?

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Buckshot

Jacob Sullum is a senior editor at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (10)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. dude   22 years ago

    "Not Dead Yet!"

    Heh-heh. That's hilarious. And yet, I think that cadaver has had more wives than I've had dates.

  2. joe   22 years ago

    How can you be so disrespectful of the man who helped launch Perot '92?

  3. quaker120   22 years ago

    No matter--CNN is being booted out of Iraq today anyway. The Iraqis accuse them of being a "propganda machine."

    http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/03/21/sprj.irq.war.main/index.html

  4. david F   22 years ago

    hey Quaker120!

    yeah -- but for whom is cnn broadcasting propaganda? are there any baby food factories around, ha ha.

    happy friday and wishes for our troops to come home safe, quickly, and victorious!!! we're proud of and thankful for you!!!

    cheers,
    drf

  5. Warren   22 years ago

    In Gulf 1, the media was a lap dog to the military. Showing endless loops of video game style smart-bomb hits, and reporting every dubious claim at face value (Patriot missile anti-scud effectiveness e.g.)
    I was hoping for more objectivity and less Gee-Whizitry this time around, but I guess war is the ultimate reality show.

  6. Phil   22 years ago

    That "lapdog" claim is an interesting one, Warren, in light of what Peter Arnett had to say in his essay entitled "Why I Stayed Behind":

    "My means of communication was the INMARSAT [International Maritime Satellite] phone, a suitcase-sized link with the world. I'd drag it out each evening and aim at the heavens, while dialing into the International Desk at CNN Atlanta. At my end, we crouched in the chill of the evening, 'we' being I and at least one Iraqi censor, or 'minder' as these censors became called. I prepared a simple, two-minute script that the minder approved, and that I then read into the phone.

    From the first day, I established a procedure that I believe saved my credibility and made my presence in Baghdad a valuable one. That procedure was a question-and-answer routine between the CNN anchor of the hour and me that followed each prepared script. The Iraqis were uncomfortable with it from the beginning because they could neither censor the questions nor my answers.

    The only rule I followed in these Q&A sessions was that I would not discuss matters of military security. Thus I didn't talk about Scud missiles I'd seen barreling northwards on camouflaged trucks; I didn't mention the antiaircraft weapons on buildings around the Al Rashid Hotel, and I gave no details on military targets. Why did the Iraqis allow these Q&A sessions? I told them from the beginning that I was risking my life in Baghdad, but I was not prepared to risk my credibility. I accepted the limitations of military security, I said, but I needed the freedom to better explore the phenomenon of being in a capital at war."

    The man allowed his reportage to be approved and censored by Iraqi officials, and agreed with CNN not to report certain types of news that would have aided the American war effort. So who's lapdog was he?

  7. Warren   22 years ago

    Phil,
    Please note, I am not disparaging Mr. Arnett or any combat correspondent that puts herself in harms way and is able to report facts that would otherwise not have been. I am accusing the networks, and also the audience they cater to for that matter, of the sort of total, unquestioned loyalty characteristic of lapdogs. The Baghdad byline, headshot photo imposed over map with low quality sat-phone audio, was all CNN wanted. Whenever anything critical of the US operations (civilian casualties e.g.) surfaced from an 'inside Iraq' reporter, they would spend twice as much time poo hooing it afterwards in studio ("Remember he has Iraqi officials monitoring his every word", "we have no way to confirm any of this" etc.). More to the point, every spoon-fed word uttered at the daily briefings was immediately regurgitated on air.
    My point is that there was no critical reporting of that war, and it doesn't look like there'll be much on this one either.

  8. Karen Capra   22 years ago

    CNN is obviously f*cked. David Neumann has destroyed any real news capability the place ever had. They had Connie Chung and Larry "Not Dead Yet!" King on last night!

  9. heather   22 years ago

    what does all the have 2 do w/blobs

  10. Rothschild David   21 years ago

    EMAIL: pamela_woodlake@yahoo.com
    IP: 62.213.67.122
    URL: http://online-sports-gambling.best-gambling.biz
    DATE: 01/20/2004 12:15:38
    'May you live all the days of your life.' - Swift

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

The Everglades Jetport Was Supposed To Be a World Wonder. Now It's 'Alligator Alcatraz.'

Matthew Petti | 7.3.2025 10:03 AM

Add It to the Tab

Liz Wolfe | 7.3.2025 9:30 AM

What Frederick Douglass Can Still Teach Us About the Fourth of July

Damon Root | 7.3.2025 7:00 AM

Cincinnati's Beer-Loving Germans Endured Anti-Immigrant and Anti-Alcohol Resistance

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | From the August/September 2025 issue

Brickbat: Second Opinion

Charles Oliver | 7.3.2025 4:00 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!