The Food and Drug Administration seems to be taking the position that cloning a person, if done in the United States, would amount to unauthorized experimentation on humans. I'm not sure who the experimental subject is in this case–the donor (who, if the Raelian claim turns out to be true, has given consent) or the baby. But if the FDA is right, why does Congress want to ban something that's already illegal?
The Washington Post Tried To Memory-Hole Kamala Harris' Bad Joke About Inmates Begging for Food and Water
At a time when legacy publications are increasingly seen as playing for one political "team" or the other, this type of editorial decision will not do anything to fix that perception.
The new president availed himself of Seila Law v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
Partisans who abandon constitutional principles because they prove inconvenient are in for a rude surprise when the other team wins.
"She was charged with violating the Reopening Ontario Act."